Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 5, September/October 2020

AFRICA

227

Cardiovascular Topics

A new inflammatory marker: elevated eosinophil-to-

lymphocyte ratio associated with presence and severity

of isolated coronary artery ectasia

Mücahid Yilmaz, Hidayet Kayançiçek, Hasan Korkmaz, Nevzat Gözel, Mehmet Nail Bilen, Özlem

Seçen, Pinar Öner, Ökke

ş

Uku, Suat Demirkiran, Yusuf Çekici, Orkun Ero

ğ

lu, Kurto

ğ

lu Ertu

ğ

rul

Abstract

Objectives:

The pathophysiology of isolated coronary artery

ectasia (CAE) involves atherosclerosis and inflammation.

Eosinophils and lymphocytes have been found to play a

significant role in inflammation, atherosclerosis and endothe-

lial dysfunction. Many studies have explored the relation-

ship between isolated CAE and systemic inflammation.

However, there are no data regarding the relationship between

eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (ELR) and isolated CAE.

Therefore, this study analysed the relationship between ELR

and isolated CAE.

Methods:

All patients who underwent coronary angiography

between January 2009 and June 2018 were investigated retro-

spectively. Of 16 240 patients, 232 patients with isolated CAE

(141 males) and 247 age- and gender-matched control subjects

(130 males) with normal coronary angiography (NCA) were

enrolled in this study. Baseline demographic and laboratory

data were obtained from the hospital database. The severity

of isolated CAE was determined according to the Markis

classification, vessel count and diffuseness of ectasia.

Results:

Patients with angiographic isolated CAE had signifi-

cantly elevated white blood cell (WBC) and eosinophil counts

and ELR values compared to patients with NCA [8.11

±

1.75 vs 7.49

±

1.80

×

10

9

cells/l,

p

<

0.0001; 0.22 (0.13–0.32)

vs 0.19 (0.12–0.28)

×

10

9

cells/l,

p

=

0.02; 0.11 (0.06–0.17) vs

0.08 (0.05–0.12),

p

<

0.0001. The ELR value for Markis I

was significantly higher than for Markis IV (

p

=

0.04), and

three-vessel isolated CAE was significantly higher than one-

vessel isolated CAE (

p

=

0.04). Additionally, the ELR value

for diffuse ectasia (Markis class I, II and III) was significantly

higher compared to focal (Markis class IV) ectasia (

p

=

0.02).

In receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses, it was

determined that an ELR value > 0.099, measured in isolated

CAE patients at application, had a predictive specificity of

60.3% and a sensitivity of 56.5% (area under the curve: 0.604,

95% confidence interval: 0.553–0.655,

p

<

0.0001).

Conclusion:

Patients with isolated CAE had higher blood

eosinophil counts and ELR. Furthermore, the ELR was

significantly correlated with severity of isolated CAE. These

findings demonstrate that ELR may have a significant role in

the aetiopathogenesis of isolated CAE.

Keywords:

eosinophil count, eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,

isolated coronary artery ectasia, inflammation

Submitted 17/4/19, accepted 21/8/19

Published online 2/10/20

Cardiovasc J Afr

2020;

31

: 227–235

www.cvja.co.za

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2019-049

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a congenital or acquired

coronary anomaly. CAE is described as the local or wide

extension of a partial or entire epicedial coronary artery

that is 1.5 times larger than the diameter of the adjacent

Department of Cardiology, Elazı

ğ

Medical Park Hospital

and Department of Cardiology, Istinye University, Elazı

ğ

,

Turkey

Hidayet Kayançiçek, MD

Suat Demirkıran, MD

Department of Cardiology, Fırat University School of

Medicine, Elazı

ğ

, Turkey

Hasan Korkmaz, MD

Department of Internal Medicine, Fırat University School of

Medicine, Elazı

ğ

, Turkey

Nevzat Gözel, MD

Department of Cardiology, Elazı

ğ

Education and Research

Hospital, Elazı

ğ

, Turkey

Mücahid Yilmaz, MD,

mucahid.yilmaz@hotmail.com

Mehmet Nail Bilen, MD

Özlem Seçen, MD

Ökke

ş

Uku, MD

Yusuf Çekici, MD

Department of Microbiology, Elazı

ğ

Education and

Research Hospital, Elazı

ğ

, Turkey

Pinar Öner, MD

Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Elazı

ğ

Education and

Research Hospital, Elazı

ğ

, Turkey

Orkun Ero

ğ

lu, MD

Department of Cardiology, Malatya Education and

Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey

Kurto

ğ

lu Ertu

ğ

rul, MD