Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 1, January/February 2015

AFRICA

43

age, gender, history of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes

mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery

disease, current smoking status and pre-operative vein diameters

between patients who were operated with and without the U-vein

compressor.

There were no significant differences in the pre-operative

diameters of the veins at the 0-, 4-, 8- and 12-cm points in the

groups. Postoperative vein diameters in the patients where U-vein

compressors were used were significantly greater at all points,

compared with patients where it was not used (

p

<

0.001). Also,

postoperative flow velocities were significantly higher in patients

where U-vein compressors were used (

p

<

0.001) (Table 2).

In patients where the U-vein compressor was used,

pre-operative mean transverse diameters (range 1.60–1.95 mm)

at the 0-, 4-, 8- and 12-cm points were increased at least 75%

postoperatively (range 2.80–3.90 mm). Flow measurements were

between 326 and 670 ml/min.

Discussion

Endogenous AVF, first described in 1966, remains the optimal

vascular access for chronic dialysis.

2

The RCAVF has remained

the access for maintenance haemodialysis because of its low

incidence of complications and high long-term patency rate.

An AVF within the anatomical snuffbox (triangular deepening

on the radial, dorsal aspect of the hand) has a high incidence

of early failure and requires a longer maturation time. The

proximal elbow fistula predisposes to ischaemic complications

and can lead to congestive heart failure as a result of increasing

flow through a chronic fistula that is made too large. The distal

radial–cephalic anastomosis just above the wrist is still the best

site for an internal AVF. This provides a relatively long, straight

cephalic vein for catheter insertion. It also leaves more proximal

sites for future use should the RCAVF fail.

The fistula is allowed to mature for six to eight weeks prior

to puncture. Occasionally longer periods of maturation are

required to allow sufficient arterialisation of the vein, but if

little venous distention is present at six weeks, either revision or

an alternate access site is usually required. Having the patient

perform repetative hand exercises such as squeezing a ball or a

similar-sized compressable object may facilitate development of

the outflow vein.

A failure-to-mature AVF is caused by intrinsically poor native

vessels or by post-surgical derangements. Poor native vessels

relate to the use of a suboptimal artery or vein to create the AVF.

It has been noted that arteries less than 1.5 to 2 mm and veins

less than 2 to 2.5 mm in diameter are associated with poor AVF

maturation.

3-6

Silva

et al

. used a minimum of 2.5-mm vein size as

predictable for fistula success.

1

In our technique, veins between

1.5 and 2 mm were associated with good AVF maturation by

intra-operative use of a U-vein compressor.

Larger veins mean larger flow. However, such a simplistic

view does not take into account arterial factors and normal

pulsatile blood flow. Furthermore, venous compliance after

fistula creation needs to be considered. In the study by Lauvao

et al

., eight patients with the smallest diameter between 1.5 and

2 mm on Doppler ultrasonograhy went on to develop mature

fistulae, and three did not.

7

Their experience shows that vein size

is the major predictor for a succesfull fistula.

In our study, pre-operative mean transverse diameters (range

1.60–1.95 mm) at the 0-, 4-, 8- and 12-cm points were increased

at least 75% postoperatively (range 2.80–3.90 mm) and flow

measurements were between 326 and 670 ml/min. The risk of

failure was zero in the group where U-vein compressors were

used, but the wrist radiocephalic arterio-venous fistula failed in

six in the other group.

A well-functioning vascular access for haemodialysis plays

a key role in the quality of life and clinical outcome of dialysis

patients. Johnson

et al

. reported that a high intra-operative flow

volume defined as 320 ml/min or greater was associated with a

lower number of surgical revisions and longer access survival

regardless of gender, race and the presence of diabetes.

8

The

same authors reported that an intra-operative flow rate of less

than 170 ml/min was correlated with a 56% risk for AVF failure

within 50 days of construction.

8

A recent study including a

cohort of 109 patients undergoing vascular access surgery for

first-time haemodialysis showed that an intra-operative flow rate

greater than 200 ml/min was associated with better mid-term

outcomes in terms of requirement for revision and early patency

rate.

9

Fistula maturation is defined by the determination of both

vascular surgeon and nephrologist that an access is patent

and ready for cannulation based on adequency of blood flow

through the fistula and adequency of vein dilatation in the 10-cm

Table 2. Comparison of pre- and postoperative diameters and

postoperative flow velocity between patients where the U-vein

compressor was not used and those where it was used

Patients

(U-vein

compressor

not used)

(

n

=

20)

Patients

(U-vein

compressor

used)

(

n

=

20)

p

-value

0 cm pre-operative

1.77

±

0.11 1.79

±

0.12 0.709

0 cm postoperative

2.45

±

0.25 3.27

±

0.42

<

0.001

4 cm pre-operative

1.78

±

0.11 1.79

±

0.11 0.832

4 cm postoperative

2.45

±

0.25 3.27

±

0.40

<

0.001

8 cm pre-operative

1.78

±

0.11 1.81

±

0.10 0.282

8 cm postoperative

2.47

±

0.26 3.33

±

0.38

<

0.001

12 cm pre-operative

1.79

±

0.11 1.83

±

0.10 0.307

12 cm postoperative

2.46

±

0.26 3.33

±

0.36

<

0.001

Flow velocity (postoperative) 197.15

±

53.52 371.75

±

93.98

<

0.001

Table 1. Comparison of patients where U-vein compressors

were not used and those where they were used

Variable

Patients

(U-vein

compressor

not used)

(

n

=

20)

Patients

(U-vein

compressor

used)

(

n

=

20)

p

-value*

Age (years)

55.8

±

7.52 57.9

±

8.12 0.41

Male,

n

(%)

12 (60)

10 (50)

0.53

Hypertension,

n

(%)

7 (35)

8 (40)

0.74

Hyperlipidaemia,

n

(%)

9 (45)

7 (35)

0.52

Chronic obstructive pulmonary

disease,

n

(%)

5 (25)

6 (30)

0.72

Coronary artery disease,

n

(%)

7 (35)

6 (30)

0.74

Diabetes mellitus,

n

(%)

5 (25)

6 (30)

0.72

Current smoker,

n

(%)

5 (25)

6 (30)

0.72

Pre-operative vein diameter

1.77

±

0.11 1.79

±

0.12 0.71