Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  35 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 3, May/June 2015

AFRICA

133

prolonged cardiopulmonary bypasses were identified as factors

affecting mortality rates.

Complications with the IABP were described in previous

studies: limb ischaemia, thrombocytopenia, arterial rupture or

dissection, and sepsis and local infections.

4–6,10,18

Complication

rates have been reported from 26 to 50% in different studies.

The risk factors for IABP complications were stated as increased

age, female gender, duration of IABP treatment, presence of

diabetes mellitus, and having several risk factors (e.g. obesity,

smoking, hypertension, cardiogenic shock, inotropic support,

low cardiac output, increased systemic vascular resistance, and

ankle–brachial pressure index

<

0.8).

In our study, the IABP complication rate was higher in

older patients compared to younger ones (25 vs 12.2%). Mild

thrombocytopeniawas themost frequentlydetectedcomplication.

When thrombocytopenia is detected, IABP therapy is terminated

immediately so that fewer bleeding complications occur.

Limitations: our study was a single-institution, retrospective

study, which had a relatively small sample size. This research

may require repeating in multicentres with randomised trials.

Unaccounted for confounders may have been inherent in such a

retrospective analysis.

Conclusion

IABPs are important cardiac support instruments that are easily

implemented and have beneficial effects for resolving transient

ischaemic situations. Whether young or old, patients who require

IABP support have a high risk of mortality. Moreover, elderly

patients have increased incidences of co-morbid disease, which

makes them even more at risk of death. We suggest that IABP

might be used in the intra-operative period as a prophylactic

device in elderly patients with multiple risk factors.

References

1.

Leinbach RC, Buckley MJ, Austen WG,

et al

. Effects of intra-aortic

balloon pumping on coronary flow and metabolism in man.

Circulation

1971;

43–44

(Suppl. I): 1–77.

2.

Swank M, Singh HM, Flemma RJ,

et al.

Effect of intra-aortic balloon

pumping on nutrient coronary flow in normal and ischemic myocar-

dium.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

1978;

76

: 538.

3.

Berne RM, Levy MN.

Cardiovascular Physiology

, 6th edn. St Louis.

Mosby-Year Book, 1992, ch 8.

4.

Harvey JC, Goldstein Jt, McCabe,

et al

. Complications of percutaneous

intraaortic balloon pumping.

Circulation

1981;

64

(Suppl II): 11–114.

5.

Cristenson JT, Cohen M, Ferguson JJ 3rd, Freedman RJ, Miller MF,

Ohman EM,

et al.

Trends in intraaortic balloon counterpulsation

complications and outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Ann Thorac Surg

2002;

74

(4): 1086–1090.

6.

MacGee E, MacCarthy P, Moazami N. Temporary mechanical circula-

tory support.

Cardiac Surgery in the Adult.

New York: MacGraw Hill,

2008: 507–533.

7.

Pi K, Block P, Warner M,

et al

. Major determinants of survival and

nonsurvival of intra-aortic balloon pump.

Am Heart J

1995;

130

:

849–853.

8.

Dalrymple-Hay MJ, Alzetani A, Aboel-Nazar S,

et al.

Cardiac surgery

in the elderly.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

1999;

15

: 61–66.

9.

Hirose H, Amano A, Yoshida S, MD, Takahashi A, Nagano N,

Kohmoto T. Coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly.

Chest

2000;

117

(5): 1220–1221.

10. Parissis H, Soo A, Al-Alao B. Intra-aortic balloon pump (

ΙΑΒΡ

): from

the old trends and studies to the current ‘extended’ indications of its use.

J Cardiothorac Surg

2012;

11

(7): 128.

11. Ferguson JJ, Cohen M, Freedman RJ, Stone GW, Miller MF, Joseph

DL, Ohman EM. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counter-

pulsation: results from the Benchmark registry.

Am Coll Cardiol

2001;

38

(5): 1456–1462.

12. Theologou T, Bashir M, Rengarajan A, Khan O, Spyt T, Richens D,

Field M. Preoperative intra aortic balloon pumps in patients undergo-

ing coronary arteryn bypass grafting.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

2011;

19

(1): 4472.

13. Böning A, Buschbeck S, Roth P, Scheibelhut C, Bödeker R, Brück M,

Niemann B. IABP before cardiac surgery: clinical benefit compared to

intraoperative implantation.

Perfusion

2013;

28

(2): 103–108.

14. Dyub AM, Whitlock RP, Abouzahr LL, Cinà CS. Preoperative intra-

aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery:

a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Card Surg

2008;

23

(1): 79–86.

15. Holman WL, Li Q, Kiefe CI, McGiffin DC, Peterson ED, Allman

RM,

et al

. Prophylactic value of preincision intra-aortic balloon pump:

analysis of a statewide experience.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2000;

120

(6): 1112–1119.

16. Miceli A, Duggan SM, Capoun R, Romeo F, Caputo M, Angelini GD.

A clinical score to predict the need for intraaortic balloon pump in

patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Ann Thorac Surg

2010;

90

(2): 522–526.

17. Huang CH, Lai ST, Weng ZC. Risk factors for mortality in primary

isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

J Formos Med Assoc

2001;

100

(5): 299–303.

18. Chertow GM, Lazarus JM, Christiansen CL, Cook EF, Hammermeister

KE, Grover F,

et al.

Preoperative renal risk stratification.

Circulation

1997;

95

: 878–884.