Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  26 / 102 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 102 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 3, May/June 2016

148

AFRICA

A reasonable alternative approach is choosing balloon size

according to the maximal inter-commissural distance of the

mitral valve as provided by echocardiography. This is a more

direct and conservative method of balloon sizing to avoid

possible mistakes when determining the size of the balloon, and

to prevent possible complications in the procedure.

The aim of this study was to assess the early haemodynamic

and echocardiograhic results of BMV according to these two

different types of Inoue balloon selection strategy.

Methods

Between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2011, 128 consecutive

symptomatic patients were seen with moderate to severe

mitral stenosis (MVA

<

1.5 cm

2

), whose valve morphology was

suitable for BMV and who had no contraindications for BMV.

Symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were included who had

a pulmonary artery systolic pressure of

>

50 mmHg at rest or 60

mmHg with exercise in the presence of favourable morphological

criteria of the mitral valve, derived from the echocardiographic

Wilkins scoring system.

11

Patients were considered eligible if they

were aged 18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria were mild mitral stenosis, a Wilkins score

of

>

10, moderate or severe mitral regurgitation, any moderate or

severe valvular heart disease other than mitral stenosis, a history

of coronary artery disease, heart failure, pulmonary embolism,

congenital heart disease, chronic kidney disease and current

pregnancy.

Patients were randomised into two groups. One group was

allocated to conventional height-based balloon reference sizing

(the HBRS group) and the other was allocated to balloons sized

by the echocardiographic measurement of the diastolic inter-

commissural diameter (the EBRS group). BMV was performed

in all patients.

All patients were informed about the study, and written

consent was obtained. The study was approved by the institution’s

ethics committee and performed in accordance with the Helsinki

Declaration.

Echocardiography

In accordance with the recommendations of the American

Society of Echocardiography, all transthoracic echocardiographic

(TTE) examinations were performed with the patient lying

in the left lateral decubitus position, and two-dimensional

images were recorded and measured in the apical four-chamber,

two-chamber, and parasternal long- and short-axis views.

15

Echocardiographic examinations were performed by two

independent cardiology specialists, blinded to the outcome of

BMV, in the echocardiography laboratory before and one month

after BMV.

B-mode, two-dimensional Doppler and colour-flow Doppler

echocardiographic evaluations were performed using a Siemens

Acuson CV70 system (Siemens AGMedical Solutions, Erlangen,

Germany) with a 2.5–4.0-MHz transducer with second harmonic

capabilities. Transoesophageal echocardiographic (TEE)

examinations were performed on all patients with a 5-MHz

multiplane endoscopic probe.

MVAs were calculated using the direct planimetry and

pressure half-time method. Diastolic trans-mitral gradients

were measured by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography.

Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was measured with

continuous-wave Doppler. Tricuspid regurgitation velocity (V)

was recorded from any view and used to determine sPAP (sPAP

=

4V

2

+

right atrial pressure). V is the maximum velocity of the

tricuspid valve regurgitant jet, measured by continuous-wave

Doppler, added to the estimated right atrial pressure. Right

atrial pressure was calculated using the caval respiratory index,

as described by Kircher

et al.

16

Finally, themaximal inter-commissural distance was measured

on the parasternal short-axis view from the anterolateral to

posteromedial commissures in mid-diastole. The degree of mitral

regurgitation and the presence of concomitant valvular heart

disease and left atrial clot were also determined.

Catheterisation and valvuloplasty

Cardiac catheterisation was performed using Siemens AXIOM

Artis dFC equipment (Siemens AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen

Germany). The right and left heart haemodynamic study was

performed to evaluate sPAP and mitral valve pressure gradients.

In the HBRS group, balloons were selected using the height-

based reference size by calculating according to the standard

height-based formula [0.1

×

height (cm)

+

10]. In the EBRS

group, balloons were selected according to the echocardiographic

inter-commissural distance measurement in mid-diastole.

The classic antegrade Inoue balloon technique was used for

BMV by two experienced cardiologists in a standard and similar

fashion. Procedures were performed with TEE guidance. After

the atrial septostomy and appropriate septal dilation, 100 IU/kg

of heparin was administered to achieve an activating clotting time

of

>

250 seconds. Left ventriculography was performed before

and after BMV to evaluate mitral regurgitation. A successful

BMV was defined as an uncomplicated procedure yielding a

final mitral valve area of

>

1.5 cm

2

and post-valvuloplasty mitral

regurgitation of

<

3

+

.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are given as mean

±

SD. Categorical

variables were defined as percentages and compared with the

chi-square test to compare the measurements before and after

BMV, and a Student’s paired

t‑

test was used. A probability value

of

p

<

0.05 was considered significant, and two-tailed

p

-values

were used for all statistics.

Results

In this study, 128 patients participated. In 65 patients, Inoue

balloon sizes were calculated according to HBRS, while in the

remaining 63 patients, sizes were provided by EBRS. The study

patients’ baseline clinical, echocardiographic and catheterisation

characteristics are shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3.

The mean age of the patients was 32 years in the HBRS

group and 31 in the EBRS group, and there was no statistically

significant difference (

p

=

0.16) between the groups; 72.7% of

the patients were female. There was no difference between the

groups in terms of weight and height (

p

=

0.64 and

p

=

0.62,

respectively). Therefore it can be considered that both groups

were similar in terms of body mass index.