Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 102 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 102 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 3, May/June 2016

160

AFRICA

line of the pump (Fig. 1). Cyanoacrylate was sprayed on the

outer surface of one of the saphenous vein grafts and allowed

to dry for five minutes. The other saphenous vein graft was

not subjected to any process and both grafts were exposed to

pump flow at 120 mmHg for approximately 45 minutes. At the

end of the procedure, both saphenous veins were placed into

containers with 10% formaldehyde solution and dispatched to

the laboratory for histopathological examination.

Histopathological examination

The removed grafts were fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde

solution for 24hours.After routine tissue processing, 5-

µ

msections

were cut from the paraffin-embedded blocks. These sections were

stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), histochemically

with Masson’s Trichrom, and immunohistochemically with

CD34, which is an endothelial marker. All sections were coded

and the endothelium was examined under a light microscope by

a pathologist who was unaware of the treatment protocol applied

(Olympus CX 51, Tokyo, Japan).

The histomorphological classification of endothelial injury

was as follows:

No injury: endothelial cells are in contact with each other,

the cell has no change in contents or reduction in diameter.

Platelets and other blood cells may or may not have adhesions

to the endothelium (Fig. 2).

Type 1 injury: while the integrity of endothelial cells is main-

tained on the entire endothelial surface and endothelial cells

are in contact with each other, there is a change in contents

and reduction in diameter (flattening) of the cell. There is

adhesion of the platelets and other blood cells to the endothe-

lium (Fig 2).

Type 2 injury: there is detachment of the cells from the junc-

tions and lack of endothelial cells in places (Fig. 3).

Type 3 injury: there is endothelial cell peeling and the subse-

quent formation of sub-endothelial tissue (Fig. 4).

Statistical analysis

The variables obtained were classified into categories and

indicated as numbers and percentages. The chi-squared test

was used to evaluate the analysis of categorical data. SPSS 18

(SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) software was used for statistical

evaluations.

Results

Endothelial injury was determined from the diameter of the

saphenous vein, which remained unchanged in the group

supported with cyanoacrylate, whereas severe distention of the

saphenous vein occurred in the control group.

Endothelial injury was examined by H&E staining and

immunohistochemically with CD34 staining, which is an

endothelial marker. On first impression, no severe damage was

seen in the saphenous vein grafts from the cyanoacrylate group,

Fig. 1.

Perivascular cyanoacrylate applied to one of the saphe-

nous vein grafts, prepared from the same patient, for

the purpose of external support.

Fig. 2.

A shows mild endothelial cell loss (black arrows) with

no oedema and no minimal intimal separation (white

arrow). B shows CD34-labelled endothelial cell loss

(black arrows). C shows minimal separation of the

tunica media and intima but no loss of organelles.

A

B

C