Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  19 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 1, January/February 2017

AFRICA

17

Discussion

Arterial blood pressure has a daily circadian rhythm.

Physiologically, nocturnal blood pressure decreases by more

than 10% compared to day-time levels, and this is called dipper

hypertension. If the nocturnal blood pressure has a less than

10% fall from day-time blood pressure values, it is considered as

non-dipper hypertension.

10

The reason for such classification is

due to the differences in morbidity and mortality rates between

these groups. In patients who have non-dipper blood pressure,

end-organ damage (ventricular hypertrophy, microalbuminuria,

decreased arterial compliance) as well as cardiovascular

morbidity and mortality rates are higher.

11,12

In order to develop a standard index for coronary blood flow

measurement, Gibson

et al

. presented the TIMI frame count

as a simple, productive, objective and quantitative technique

by investigating the angiographic images of the TIMI-4 study.

8

After administration of an opaque material, the TIMI square

count is the sum of the ciné-angiographic squares seen between

the level of the stained coronary artery ostium and its distal part

on CAG. A high TIMI frame count is related to a slow flow rate

and endothelial dysfunction.

13

In our study, we compared the

TIMI frame count in dipper and non-dipper hypertensive patient

groups who had normal CAG.

According to a study by Yazici

et al

., the number of

non-dipper patients was significantly higher than dipper patients

in a patient group with slow coronary flow rates. In that study,

the non-dipper patients with slow coronary flow rates had a

higher percentage of unstable angina-like features, recurrent

chest pain, frequency of malignant ventricular arrhythmia and

sudden cardiac death rates than dipper patients.

14

Evola

et al

. compared the TIMI frame counts of 80

hypertensive patients with normal CAG with 15 normotensive

subjects, and found higher TIMI scores in the hypertensive

group. In the same study, when the hypertensive patients with

negative and positive myocardial perfusion scintigraphy were

compared, the TIMI frame counts were significantly higher

in patients with positive scintigraphy.

15

From these data, they

predicted that coronary artery flow and myocardial perfusion

disorders were more frequent in the group with high TIMI frame

counts. They concluded that myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

could be used as a non-invasive diagnostic test to determine early

changes in coronary microcirculation.

In our study, we found a higher TIMI frame count in all

three coronary arteries in the non-dipper hypertensive patient

group compared to the dipper group. In their study showing the

significance of small-vessel disorder, Pekdemir

et al

. investigated

the coronary anatomy using intravascular ultrasonography

(IVUS) and epicardial resistance with fractional flow reserve

(FFR).

16

They stated that in patients with slow coronary flow, the

increase in resistance in epicardial coronary arteries could play a

role in the development of early diffuse atherosclerosis.

In a patient group with slow coronary flow, Xia

et al

.

discovered higher serum uric acid, platelet count, high-sensitivity

C-reactive protein (CRP) and two-hour fasting glucose levels

compared to the control group.

17

In recent epidemiological and

experimental studies, a high uric acid level has been proven to be

a cardiovascular risk factor.

18,19

Using the TIMI frame count, Turhan

et al.

compared

coronary blood flow in 42 metabolic syndrome patients and a

control group of 42 subjects without the metabolic syndrome.

The TIMI frame count was statistically significantly higher in

patients with higher values of waist circumference, body mass

index and triglyceride levels.

20

In our study, the body mass index

was statistically significantly higher in the non-dipper group than

in the dipper group.

According to numerous robust evidence, deterioration of

endothelial-dependent vasodilatation as a result of a decrease

in nitric oxide release in brachial, coronary, renal and small

arteries is a risk factor in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular

patients.

21-26

Higashi

et al.

compared endothelial dysfunction in 20

non-dipper and 20 dipper hypertensive patients.

27

The endothelial

dysfunction predictors were decreased nitric oxide final products,

nitrite/nitrate and cyclic guanicine monophosphate in 24-hour

urine samples. In the non-dipper patient group, nitrite/nitrate

and cyclic guanicine monophosphate levels in 24-hour urine

samples were statistically significantly lower. If we consider the

TIMI frame count as a predictor of endothelial dysfunction,

finding a higher TIMI frame count in all three coronary arteries

confirms the study by Higashi

et al.

27

Table 3. Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure data

between the groups

Ambulatory blood pressure

Dipper

group

(

n

=

30)

Non-dipper

group

(

n

=

30)

p

-value*

Pulse (bpm

±

SD)

66.57

±

4.92 72.70

±

4.86

0.001

Over 24 hours

Mean systolic BP

(mmHg

±

SD)

118.93

±

14.8 124.37

±

19.23 0.226

Mean diastolic BP

(mmHg

±

SD)

68.76

±

10.55 69.53

±

8.64 0.749

Day-time

Mean systolic BP

(mmHg

±

SD)

123.47

±

16.67 124.63

±

19.08 0.802

Mean diastolic BP

(mmHg

±

SD)

71.87

±

11.49 69.67

±

9.21 0.417

Night-time

Mean systolic BP

(mmHg

±

SD)

108.10

±

13.61 123.50

±

20.49

0.001

Mean diastolic BP

(mmHg

±

SD)

60.60

±

8.94 69.13

±

8.3

<

0.001

Systolic BP variation

(%

±

SD)

13.33

±

4.47 1.32

±

5.49

<

0.001

Diastolic BP variation

(%

±

SD)

15.57

±

5.74 2.03

±

6.03

<

0.001

Continuous data are expressed as mean

±

SD.

*Independent samples

t

-test, statistical significance level is

p

<

0.05

(bold values)

BPM: beat per minute, SD: standard deviation, BP: blood pressure.

Table 4. Comparison of TIMI frame scores between the groups

TIMI fram scores

Dipper

group

(

n

=

30)

Non-dipper

group

(

n

=

30)

p

-value*

RCA TIMI frame score

16.83

±

3.70 21.63

±

3.44

<

0.001

Cx TIMI frame score

21.28

±

3.52 25.65

±

3.61

<

0.001

LAD TIMI frame score

34.20

±

2.80 37.05

±

3.30

0.001

LAD corrected TIMI frame score 20.05

±

1.63 21.74

±

1.95

0.001

The average TIMI frame score 19.31

±

2.31 22.94

±

2.61

<

0.001

Continuous data are expressed as mean

±

SD.

*Chi-squared test, statistical significance level is

p

<

0.05 (bold values).

RCA: right coronary artery, TIMI: thrombolysis in myocardial infarc-

tion, Cx: circumflex artery, LAD: left anterior descending artery.