CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 1, January/February 2017
AFRICA
15
Patients who were below 18 and above 80 years, with coronary
artery disease, haemodynamic changes, congenital heart disease,
left ventricular ejection fraction below 55%, and those who had
severe valve disease were excluded. The study was approved
by the Trakya University Ethics Board (08.02.2012, Decision
Nr.05/12, Protocol Nr. 201/39).
Age, gender, height, weight, hypertension and diabetes
mellitus status, smoking and alcohol consumption, medications,
electrocardiogram (ECG), lipid profile and creatinine levels were
obtained from the patient files. Body mass index (BMI) was
calculated by dividing the body weight (kg) by the square of
the height (m). Echocardiogram (echo) reports were obtained
from the echo laboratory, coronary artery images from the CAG
laboratory, and 24-hour blood pressure levels were obtained
from the effort-Holter laboratory.
The echo evaluations of the patients were performed using
the Vivid 7 Pro (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin). Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was calculated
with the M-mode imaging method.
Ambulatory blood pressure follow up was done with the
tension artery Holter device (DMS 300-3A Holter Recorder)
register system using the ambulatory blood pressure Spacelab
90207 device (Space Labs Inc, Richmond, Washington, USA).
ABPM was performed before hospitalisation, irrespective of the
type and duration of antihypertensive drug therapy. The patients
were recommended to maintain daily activities and to hold the
arms straight during measurement. Blood measurements were
made every 15 minutes between 07:00 and 23:00, and every 20
minutes between 23:00 and 07:00. Using short time intervals,
the 10:00–22:00 interval was accepted as the day-time, and the
24:00–06:00 interval as the night-time period. The recorded data
were evaluated at the end of 24 hours.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels and heart rate
measurements were evaluated for the day and night-time periods.
If the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels decreased
by less than 10% or did not fall, the patient was considered
a non-dipper, and if it decreased by more than 10%, it was
considered dipper hypertension.
9,10
All of the patients had undergone CAG due to a positive
myocardial perfusion ischaemia test. The coronary angiography
procedures had been performed up to one month after the
ABPM. Coronary artery evaluation of the patients was made
using the Philips Integris H 3000 (Eindhoven, The Netherlands)
angiogram device. The presence or absence of coronary artery
disorders was recorded. Patients who had any degree of coronary
artery stenosis or plaques and those who had haemodynamic
changes that may have affected the square counts during the
angiogram were excluded. The TIMI frame count of patients
whose coronary arteries were normal was separately calculated
for all three coronary arteries. Nitrate was not administered to
any patients during the CAG, as it could have affected the results
of the measurements.
Gibson
et al
. were the first to present the TIMI frame count,
or the TIMI square-count method as a simple, productive,
objective and quantitative technique to provide a standard index
for coronary blood flow measurement. They investigated the
angiographic images of the TIMI-4 study.
8
The TIMI frame count was calculated by an independent
operator (always the same operator), who did not know the
AMBP results. To determine the TIMI frame count following
administration of the opaque material, the ciné-angiographic
square counts seen between the level of the stained coronary
artery ostium and its distal part were added up. The first square
was taken at the moment when an opacification was seen filling
the whole of the coronary artery orifice and moving forward.
The last square was caught at the moment when the dye
reached the standard marker point determined separately for the
three arteries by Gibson
et al.
at the distal part of the vessel.
8
The prediction points were the distal bifurcation branching point
for the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (whale-tail sign
at bifurcation point), the branchlet separating from the distal
bifurcation at the furtherest point where the artery opacified
after the lesion for the circumflex artery (Cx), and the filling
moment of the posterolateral branchlet after the posterior
descending artery for the right coronary artery (RCA). The
best projection angle was the right anterior oblique or the left
anterior oblique-caudal angle for the LAD and Cx, and the left
anterior oblique-cranial angle for the RCA.
In Gibson and co-workers’ study, the TIMI frame count
for the RCA was 20.4
±
3.0, the square count for the Cx artery
was 22.2
±
4.1, and for the LAD, it was 36.2
±
2.6 (
p
<
0.001).
8
These values were standard measurements when the coronary
angiogram device could take 30 frames/s. If the coronary
angiogram worked at a rate of 12.5 frame/s, to adjust to standard
measurements, the value was multiplied by 2.4. If the coronary
angiogram worked at a rate of 25 frame/s, to adjust to standard
measurements, the value was multiplied by 1.2. If the coronary
angiogram worked at a rate of 15 frame/s, to adjust to standard
measurements, the value was multiplied by two.
For the LAD, the correction for this difference was made by
dividing the square count by 1.7. Therefore, the TIMI square
count corrected for the LAD (cLAD) was determined as 21.1
±
1.5 squares. The mean TIMI frame count was calculated by
adding three coronary artery TIMI frame counts and dividing
by three.
Statistical analysis
For the descriptive statistics of the data, the mean, standard
deviation and ratios were used. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test
was used for distribution of the data. Comparison of the means
between the two groups was done using the independent samples
t
-test. The Chi-squared test was used for analysis of the ratios.
The SPSS 20.0 program was used for the analysis. Statistical
significance was set at
p
<
0.05 for all analyses.
Results
Sixty patients (38% female), whose mean age was 52.85
±
10.42
years, were included in the study. The demographic and clinical data
of the patients are presented in Table 1. The patients were grouped
as dippers (
n
=
30) and non-dippers (
n
=
30). The demographic
and clinical data of the groups were compared. No significant
differences were found between gender, age, smoking and alcohol
consumption of the dipper and non-dipper patient groups.
The BMI in the non-dipper group (25.47
±
2.92 kg/m
2
) was
significantly higher than that of the dippers (23.79
±
2.81 kg/
m
2
) (
p
=
0.027). There was no significant difference between
symptoms, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus between the
dipper and non-dipper groups. Similarly, the use of angiotensin