Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  65 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 65 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 1, January/February 2017

AFRICA

63

Univariate associations between echo parameters and outcomes

are presented for the whole analysis population as well as by

key diagnosis groups. Diagnoses were grouped as hypertension,

cardiomyopathy, valvular and other. Valvular was defined as

having rheumatic heart disease or at least one of the following

classified as severe: aortic stenosis or regurgitation, mitral stenosis

or regurgitation. To assess whether an association between an

echo parameter and outcomes differed by diagnosis group, we

tested for the significance of the diagnosis-by-echo parameter

interaction term in the Cox regression model for the outcome.

The number of events in the analysis population limited

development of multivariate models for 180- and 60-day

mortality or re-admission. Because of this, we chose a few echo

parameters in addition to predictors known to be associated with

each outcome in this study population.

Multiple imputations were used with a method that assumes

multivariate normality (SAS PROC MI) to handle missing

values. The imputation model included all covariates under

consideration for the multivariate models. The ranges of imputed

values were restricted to the ranges of the observed values.

Seven imputation datasets were used. Parameter estimates were

averaged across these datasets using Rubin’s algorithm (SAS

PROC MIANALYZE). Backwards selection was used in each

of the seven imputation datasets, with the criterion for staying at

p

<

0.10. Predictors that were significant in the majority of the

imputed datasets were kept in the final model. SAS release 9.2

(SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for analyses.

Results

There was a total of 1 006 patients in the THESUS-HF registry,

3

of whom 954 had an echocardiogram performed within four

weeks before to two weeks after enrollment. Among these 954

patients, the mean age

±

SD of the patients was 52.3

±

18.2 years,

469 (49.2%) were men, the predominant race was black African

(99.1%), 11.4% of patients had diabetes mellitus and 9.0% had

hyperlipidaemia. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction

(LVEF)

±

SD was 39.4

±

16.4%, the initial systolic blood pressure

was 130.7

±

33.5 mmHg, and heart rate was 104

±

21.4 beats per

min (Table 1).

Heart failure was most commonly due to hypertension (

n

=

380; 40.9%), followed by rheumatic valvular heart disease (

n

=

133; 14.3%), and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (

n

=

129;

13.9%). Ischaemic heart failure was present in only 71 (7.6%)

patients (Table 1).

The distribution and proportion of missing values for each

echocardiographic parameter are presented in Table 1. LVEF

was available for 897 patients and was missing for 6.0% of

patients. LVEF was

<

50% in 654 (73%) patients and ≥ 50%

in 243 (27%) patients. Patients’ characteristics according to

LVEF are presented in Table 1. Patients with HF with reduced

ejection fraction had higher proportions of males and peripheral

oedema, and lower systolic blood pressure, higher heart rate and

lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, on average.

Univariate associations between the echo predictors and the

outcomesbydiagnosis groups (hypertensiveheart disease, valvular

heart disease and other) suggest that none of the associations of

echo parameters with outcomes differed significantly among the

diagnostic groups (Tables 2, 3). Univariate associations of echo

predictors with 60-day death or re-admission and with 180-day

death are shown in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. Heart rate and

left atrial size were associated with death or re-admission within

60 days. Heart rate, left ventricular posterior wall thickness and

presence of aortic stenosis were associated with the risk of death

up to 180 days.

The multivariate models suggest left ventricular end-systolic

diameter, interventricular septal thickness in diastole, posterior

wall thickness in diastole, left atrial size and E/A wave ratio

did not add significantly to prediction of 60-day death or

re-admission, while left ventricular posterior wall thickness

added to clinical variables in the prediction of 180-day mortality

(Tables 2, 3).

Table 2. Univariate associations between echo predictors and 60-day death or re-admission by diagnosis groups

Echocardiographic parameter

Hypertensive CMP (

n

=

338)

Valvular (

n

=

217)

Other (

n

=

399)

Interaction

p

-value

Hazard ratio

(95% CI)

p

-value

Hazard ratio

(95% CI)

p

-value

Hazard ratio

(95% CI)

p

-value

LVEDD (mm)

0.98 (0.95–1.01)

0.15 1.02 (0.99–1.05)

0.29 1.01 (0.99–1.03)

0.49 0.17

LVESD (mm)

0.98 (0.96– 1.00)

0.087 1.01 (0.98–1.04)

0.47 1.00 (0.98–1.02)

0.92 0.20

IVSTd (mm)

0.98 (0.89–1.09)

0.76 0.98 (0.88– 1.10)

0.77 0.93 (0.85–1.02)

0.12 0.64

PWTd (mm)

1.03 (0.91–1.15)

0.68 0.97 (0.85– 1.10)

0.59 0.93 (0.84–1.04)

0.19 0.47

LV mass

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.44 1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.63 1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.59 0.62

LVEF (%), per 5% increment

1.07 (0.97–1.18)

0.16 0.99 (0.89– 1.11)

0.86 0.99 (0.91–1.08)

0.82 0.42

Left atrial size (A-P) (mm)

1.02 (0.97– 1.06)

0.46 1.01 (0.98– 1.05)

0.57 1.00 (0.97– 1.03)

0.97 0.83

Left atrial size (planimetry) mm

2

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.083 1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.49 1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.055 0.73

E/A ratio per doubling

0.93 (0.65–1.31)

0.67 1.67 (0.75– 3.75)

0.21 1.15 (0.85–1.55)

0.37 0.35

E-wave deceleration time (ms)

1.00 (0.99–1.00)

0.65 1.00 (0.99–1.00)

0.24 1.00 (0.99–1.01)

0.73 0.77

MV A-wave duration

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

0.25 1.01 (1.00–1.01)

0.049 0.99 (0.99–1.00)

0.17 0.056

MV E/A ratio grades

Grade 1: impaired relaxation

(reference group)

0.32

(reference group)

(reference group)

0.63 0.18

Grade 2: pseudonormal

1.63 (0.66–3.98)

0.78 (0.29–2.09)

Grade 3: restrictive filling

0.93 (0.39–2.18)

1.13 (0.49–2.58)

LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; IVSTd, interventricular septal thickness in diastole;

PWTd, posterior wall thickness in diastole; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; A-P, antero-posterior; MV, mitral valve.

Heart rates are for an increment of one unit in the predictor unless otherwise noted. Valvular group defined as rheumatic heart disease or having

severe mitral stenosis/regurgitation, aortic stenosis/regurgitation.