Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  68 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 68 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 1, January/February 2017

66

AFRICA

with acute HF. Because the echocardiographic evaluations

performed in the current study were not done close to the time

of admission in many patients, the worst measures may have

been missed. It is also possible that some specific characteristics

of the patient population may have contributed to this lack of

association.

Increased resting heart rate is a known predictor

for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in a variety of

cardiovascular diseases, including HF.

26

In patients with reduced

LVEF, with or without signs or symptoms of HF, high heart rate

has predicted adverse outcomes, irrespective of other known

risk factors.

27

Several pathophysiological mechanisms, including

blunting of the force–frequency relationship, the induction of

myocardial ischaemia, precipitation of rhythm disturbances, and

acceleration of atherosclerosis have been proposed to explain

the association between higher heart rate and worse outcomes in

patients with HF.

26

Higher heart rate might also be a marker of greater

neurohormonal activation. The SHIFT study showed that heart

rate is important in the pathophysiology of HF with reduced

LVEF, and that heart rate reduction

per se

is a mechanism

responsible for improvement in clinical outcomes.

28

The CHARM investigators also found that the value of

resting heart rate in predicting worse outcomes was independent

of baseline left ventricular systolic function in heart failure.

29

A

higher heart rate was associated with a greater risk of hospital

stay for HF, both in patients with reduced and preserved LVEF

in a

post hoc

analysis of the DIG (Digitalis Investigation Group)

trial. In predicting mortality, however, higher heart rate was only

significant in patients with a reduced LVEF.

30

Similar to our findings, left atrial size or its surrogates have

been shown to predict hospitalisation for HF and death in other

studies.

31

Left atrial size predicts death among high-risk groups,

such as patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, LV dysfunction,

atrial arrhythmias, acute myocardial infarction, as well as in in

the general population.

32

Left atrial size, aortic stenosis, heart rate and measures

of hypertrophy had some value in predicting outcome in our

cohort. This may suggest that early diagnosis and treatment of

hypertension and valvular heart disease in sub-Saharan Africa

should be emphasised to improve outcome.

Limitations

Our data should be interpreted in the context of their limitations.

Unobserved variables may have confounded the results. Not

all echocardiographic parameters were available in all patients,

limiting the number of parameters for analysis. The variable

timing of the echocardiogram and inter-observer variability

may have affected the specific results obtained. Furthermore,

the number of events was small. Therefore both the variable

selection and the parameter estimates for the selected variables

are subject to instability.

We also looked at echo predictors of acute HF from various

causes. Even though there was no statistically significant

interaction between the echo variables, different conditions and

outcomes, there could still be a dilutional effect of grouping

heterogeneous conditions together.

Finally, our results are drawn from a population of young

acute HF patients predominantly with systolic dysfunction.

Consequently, these findings may not apply to older patients or

to those with preserved LVEF.

Conclusions

In accordance with previous studies, echocardiographic

variables, especially those of left ventricular size and function,

were found to have little or no additional predictive value in

patients admitted for acute HF. Left atrial size was associated

with death or re-admission within 60 days while left ventricular

posterior wall thickness and the presence of aortic stenosis were

associated with the risk of death within 180 days. There is a need

for further studies of echocardiographic evaluation, especially

when performed closer to the acute event, to further elucidate

the pathophysiology and risk stratification of patients with acute

HF.

The THESUS-HF study was funded by Momentum Research Inc, Durham,

North Carolina, United States of America

Reference

1.

Antony KK. Pattern of cardiac failure in northern savanna Nigeria.

Trop Geogr Med

1980;

32

: 118–125.

2.

Oyoo GO, Ogola EN. Clinical and socio demographic aspects of

congestive heart failure patients at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi.

East Afr Med J

1999;

76

: 23–27.

3.

Damasceno A, Mayosi BM, Sani M, Ogah OS, Mondo C, Ojji D,

et

al

. The causes, treatment, and outcome of acute heart failure in 1006

Africans from 9 countries: results of the sub-Saharan Africa Survey of

Heart Failure.

Arch Intern Med

2012;

172

: 1386–1394.

4.

Adams KF Jr, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo

MR, Abraham WT,

et al

. ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee

and Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized

for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary

observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated

Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE).

Am Heart J

2005;

149

:

209–216.

5.

O’Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Wojdyla D, Leifer E, Clare RM, Ellis SJ,

et al.

Factors related to morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic

heart failure with systolic dysfunction: the HF-ACTION Predictive Risk

Score Model.

Circ Heart Fail

2012;

5

: 63–71.

6.

Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM,

Francis GS,

et al.

ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and manage-

ment of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary: a report

of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association

Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995

Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure).

J Am

Coll Cardiol

2001;

38

: 2101–2113.

7.

McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Böhm M,

Dickstein K,

et al.

ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of

acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis

and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the

European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the

Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

Eur J Heart Fail

2012;

14

: 803–869.

8.

Carluccio E, Dini FL, Biagioli P, Lauciello R, Simioniuc A, Zuchi C,

et al

. The ‘Echo Heart Failure Score’: an echocardiographic risk predic-

tion score of mortality in systolic heart failure.

Eur J Heart Fail

2013;

15

: 868–876.