Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 1, January/February 2017

AFRICA

5

VividiVingmed Ultrasound; Horten, Norway). Comprehensive

two-dimensional (2D) and Doppler echocardiographic

evaluation were performed with the patient in the left lateral

decubitus position before coronary angiography.

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within

the first 24 hours of initial diagnosis. While performing

transthoracic echocardiography all patients were monitored by

ECG, and echocardiographic parameters were measured with

synchronisation by ECG.

In the apical four-chamber view, mitral inflow velocities

were measured with the Doppler sample placed at the tip of the

valve leaflets, at the left ventricular outflow tract, and below the

aortic valve plane. All measurements were averaged over three

consecutive cardiac cycles.

Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) was measured from

closure of the aortic valve to opening of the mitral valve.

Isovolumic contraction time (IVCT) was measured from closure

of the mitral valve to opening of the aortic valve. Ejection time

(ET) was measured from the opening to the closure of the aortic

valve on the left ventricular outflow velocity profile. MPI was

calculated as the sum of the IVRT and IVCT divided by the ET.

Peak velocities of early (E) and late (A) filling were determined

according to the mitral inflow velocity curve.

Angiographic examination

All patients underwent selective coronary angiography via the

Judkins technique (IntegrisAllura 9; Philips Medical Systems,

Eindhoven, the Netherlands). All angiograms were evaluated

by two experienced interventional cardiologists blinded to

the clinical baseline characteristics of the patients. In cases of

discrepancy, the opinion of a third interventional cardiologist

was obtained, and the final decision was made by consensus.

The severity of coronary artery lesions was scored using a

modified Gensini scoring system.

1

In brief, coronary circulation

was divided into eight proximal segments; the percentage by

which each lesion in the proximal coronary circulation narrowed

the artery was assessed according to the maximal narrowing of

the diameter of the artery in all projections.

The extent and severity of proximal coronary disease was

assessed by assigning points to each lesion as follows: less

than 50% stenosis of the luminal diameter, one point; 50 to

74% stenosis, two points; 75 to 99% stenosis, three points; and

total obstruction, four points. The points for each lesion in the

proximal coronary circulation were added, and a score for the

severity of coronary atherosclerosis was obtained.

According to the modified Gensini scoring system, the degree

of coronary stenosis was classified as follows: mild lesions, one

to six points; moderate lesions, seven to 13 points; and severe

lesions,

>

13 points. Patients were divided into tertiles according

to the GS: low GS

<

19; mid GS

>

19 and

96; and high GS

>

96 points.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical

Package for Social Sciences) for Windows version 12 (Chicago,

Illinois). Continuous variables are expressed as mean

±

SD, and

categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages.

Continuous variables were compared between groups using

one-way analysis of variance for normally distributed data, and

the chi-squared test was used for nominal variables. Correlations

between variables were calculated using the Pearson correlation

coefficient. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to

identify the factors related to the GS. A

p

-value of

<

0.05 was

considered significant.

Results

Of the 90 patients included in this study, 24 were assigned to the

low-GS group (26.7%), 38 to the mid-GS group (42.2%) and 28

to the high-GS group (31.1%). The demographic and clinical

characteristics of the 90 patients with NSTEMI according to the

GS are presented in Table 1.

The mean patient age was significantly higher in the high-

GS group than in the low- and mid-GS groups (

p

=

0.035).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics and laboratory findings

Variables

Group 1

(

n

=

24)

Group 2

(

n

=

38)

Group 3

(

n

=

28)

p-

value

Age (years)

49.4

±

11.1 54.7

±

10.3 56.7

±

9.3 0.035

Male,

n

(%)

18 (75)

29 (76.3)

26 (92.9)

0.15

Diabetes

mellitus,

n

(%)

6 (25)

13 (34.2)

7 (25)

0.63

Hypertension,

n

(%)

12 (50)

16 (42.1)

8 (8.6)

0.27

Hyperlipidaemia,

n

(%) 4 (16.7)

9 (23.7)

2 (7.1)

0.20

Current smokers,

n

(%) 17 (70.8)

26 (68.4)

21 (75)

0.84

Glucose (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

128.6

±

66.2

(7.14

±

3.67)

136.0

±

59.7

(7.55

±

3.31)

132.0

±

54.0

(7.33

±

3.00)

0.91

LDL (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

111.1

±

35.4

(2.88

±

0.92)

131.4

±

38.8

(3.40

±

1.00)

132.5

±

35.9

(3.43

±

0.93)

0.07

HDL (mg/dl)

(mmol/l)

41.1

±

16.7

(1.06

±

0.43)

36.7

±

9.0

(0.95

±

0.23)

39.4

±

8.5

(1.02

±

0.22)

0.34

eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m

2

) 96.8

±

25.5 96.5

±

19.5 92.1

±

21.1 0.66

Haemoglobin (g/dl)

14.2

±

1.0 13.6

±

1.7 13.9

±

1.5 0.31

Leukocytes (× 10

3

/ml) 8513

±

2506 8826

±

3527 8813

±

2288 0.91

Platelet count (× 10

3

/

ml)

248

±

68

253

±

81

233

±

62 0.55

LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein

cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Table 2. Echocardiographic findings in the three groups

Variables

Group 1

(

n

=

24)

Group 2

(

n

=

38)

Group 3

(

n

=

28)

p-

value

IVRT (ms)

88.9

±

18.9 101.7

±

29.1 113.1

±

29.9 0.008

IVCT (ms)

67.3

±

25.1 61.4

±

31.6 74.0

±

20.4 0.18

ET (ms)

283.0

±

24.1 273.9

±

31.5 241.0

±

21.4

<

0.001

MPI

0.50

±

0.11 0.60

±

0.21 0.72

±

0.12

<

0.001

E/A

1.0

±

0.29 0.97

±

0.46 0.91

±

0.39 0.31

E/e

5.8

±

1.5 6.1

±

2.1 6.1

±

1.9

0.87

EF (%)

58.2

±

3.9 56.4

±

5.3 53.8

±

6.2 0.01

Left atrium (cm)

3.30

±

0.4 3.39

±

0.4 3.50

±

0.4 0.25

LVEDD (cm)

4.76

±

0.3 4.74

±

0.4 4.84

±

0.3 0.61

RV (cm)

2.11

±

0.1 2.21

±

0.2 2.2

±

0.1

0.24

IVRT, isovolumic relaxation time; IVCT, isovolumic contraction time;

ET, ejection time; MPI, myocardial performance index; E/A, ratio of

peak velocities of early (E) and late (A) transmitral filling; E/e

, ratio

between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic

velocity; EF, ejection fraction; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic

diameter; RV, right ventricle.