Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  28 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 2, March/April 2017

94

AFRICA

brand of mercury sphygmomanometer. Systolic (SBP) and

diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were the first and the fifth

koroktoff sounds, respectively. Three consecutive measurements

were made at an interval of five minutes after a 10-minute rest.

The mean SBP and DBP determined from the second and third

measurements were used for data analysis.

Anthropometric indices were calculated as follows:

BMI

=

weight (kg)/height

2

(m); WHR

=

WC (cm)/HC (cm);

WHtR

=

WC (cm)/height (cm); PI

=

weight (kg)/height

3

(cm);

BAI

=

HC (cm)/height

1.5

(m) – 18; CI

=

​ 

WC (m)

__________ 

0.109

×

​ 

weight (kg)

_______ 

height (cm)

Hypertension was defined using the WHO/ISH criteria of

SBP

140 mmHg and/or DBP

90 mmHg, or clinical diagnosis

of hypertension, or prescription of any hypertensive drug.

Prehypertension was defined as SBP

120 mmHg and/or DBP

80 mmHg.

This study was conducted with adherence to ethical standards.

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of

Nnamadi Azikiwe Uiversity, Awka, Nigeria. The objectives and

nature of the study were duly explained to the participants prior

to the day of the test and interview. Informed consent in written

form or by thumb print was obtained from all participants or

parents. Strict confidentiality was maintained in accordance with

standard medical practices.

Statistical analysis

Comparison of means between the two groups was done using

the independent

t

-test. Poisson regression models were used to

examine the association between anthropometric indices and

hypertension/prehypertension prevalence. The receiver operating

characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the

performance of the anthropometric indices as potential predictors

of the disease. The ROC curve is an analytical approach to

define the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity of a

screening test. The approach has been widely used to determine

a cut-off point for decision making (e.g. having a disease or not)

in both public health and clinical settings.

Area under the curve (AUC) was used as a measure of

predictive power. It is the most common measurement to

quantify the performance of a screening test, and shows the

ability of a test to correctly classify those with and without the

disease. For example, an AUC of 0.75 indicates that 75% of the

time, a randomly selected individual from the diseased group has

a test value larger than that for a randomly selected individual

from the non-diseased group. AUC values range from 0.5 (no

prediction) to 1.0 (perfect prediction). AUC values are usually

used as criteria to compare overall performance of different

screening tests. In this study, AUCs for models were estimated

using logistic regression models.

To determine if the inclusion of WC, WHtR or PI improved

the prediction of hypertension using BMI, we estimated the

change in gender-specific prevalence ratio (from Poisson

Table 1. General characteristics of the study population

Variables

No hypertension,

n

(%)

Hypertension,

n

(%)

Age (years)

≤ 20

92 (10.09)

7 (0.77)

21–25

279 (30.59)

29 (3.18)

26–40

245 (26.86)

90 (9.87)

41

88 (9.65)

82 (8.99)

City

Awka

241 (26.43)

59 (6.47)

Onitsha

203 (22.26)

98 (10.75)

Nnewi

260 (28.51)

51 (5.59)

Gender

Male

340 (37.28)

96 (10.53)

Female

364 (39.91)

112 (12.28)

Body mass index

Underweight

13 (1.43)

3 (0.33)

Normal weight

394 (43.20)

64 (7.02)

Overweight

219 (24.01)

92 (10.09)

Obese

78 (8.55)

49 (5.37)

Smoking

No

683 (75.64)

192 (21.26)

Yes

15 (1.66)

13 (1.44)

Physical activity

Not active

25 (2.75)

31 (3.41)

Moderately active

385 (42.35)

136 (14.96)

Active

292 (32.12)

40 (4.40)

Alcohol consumption

Not at all

314 (35.01)

89 (9.92)

≤ 1 per month

265 (29.54)

51 (5.69)

1–3 times per week

83 (9.25)

36 (4.01)

Every day

31 (3.46)

28 (3.12)

Table 2. Mean (SEM) values of the anthropometric indices categorised by gender and hypertension status

Male

Female

p-value

Normal

(

n

=

142)

Prehypertensive

(

n

=

198)

Hypertensive

(

n

=

96)

Normal

(

n

=

174)

Prehypertensive

(

n

=

192)

Hypertensive

(

n

=

112)

SBP,

n

(%)

104.44 ( 6.51)

121.29 (7.94)

145.13 (16.36)

104.44 (6.51)

121.54 (7.48)

145.68 (15.95)

0.749

DBP,

n

(%)

68.41 (6.02)

77.79 (5.39)

96.05 (8.98)

68.41 (6.02)

78.37 (5.94)

93.42 (11.32)

0.8795

Weight,

n

(%)

66.30 (9.10)

72.28 (11.13)

77.97 (14.09)

64.72 (11.11)

69.45 (11.86)

72.98 (15.55)

0.0000

Height,

n

(%)

169.11 (7.69)

169.74 (7.25)

170.58 (7.48)

162.20 (7.34)

162.50 (7.07)

162.65 (7.14)

0.0000

WC,

n

(%)

83.48 (8.03)

87.99 (8.16)

93.64 (11.86)

86.32 (10.66)

90.39 (12.71)

93.40 (11.86)

0.0117

HC,

n

(%)

93.56 (9.12)

97.58 (8.70)

101.73 (12.73)

98.08 (12.76)

101.09 (12.89)

103.58 (13.23)

0.0000

WHR,

n

(%)

0.89 (0.067)

0.90 (0.04)

0.92 (0.04)

0.88 (0.07)

0.90 (0.06)

0.90 (0.05)

0.0028

WHtR,

n

(%)

0.49 (0.044)

0.55 (0.067)

0.22 (0.03)

0.21 (0.03)

0.22 (0 .03)

0.23 (0.03)

0.0000

PI,

n

(%)

13.75 (1.96)

14.85 (2.49)

15.69 (2.37)

15.17 (2.33)

16.28 (3.07)

16.94 (3.28)

0.0000

BAI,

n

(%)

24.57 (3.91)

26.24 (4.56)

27.68 (5.33)

29.54 (5.96)

30.96 (6.97)

31.99 (6.19)

0.0000

BMI,

n

(%)

23.18 ( 2.90)

25.12 (3.78)

26.72 (3.95)

24.55 (3.57)

26.34 (4.43)

27.51 (5.22)

0.0001

CI,

n

(%)

1.23 (0.11)

1.24 (0.09)

1.28 (0.13)

1.25 (0.10)

1.27 (0.13)

1.29 (0.10)

0.0007

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; WC, waist circumference; HC, hip circumference; WHR, waist–hip ratio; WHtR, waist–height ratio; PI,

ponderal index; BAI, body adiposity index; BMI, body mass index; CI, conicity index.