Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 2, March/April 2018

AFRICA

85

with DM2 who was diagnosed in the preceding six months, and

this finding was mainly due to BMI and age.

Recent studies have shown that LA enlargement, obtained

from 2D echocardiography, is a good predictor of cardiovascular

outcomes.

7

However, there are several limitations to estimating

LA size because of the irregular geometry of the left atrium.

Additionally, the left atrium often enlarges asymmetrically,

which causes underestimation of its size. Therefore, it has been

suggested that LA volume may be a superior measure of LA

size.

7

Moreover, changes in LA volume are increasingly becoming

a parameter of interest as a marker of overall cardiac function.

Several studies have shown that changes in LA size and

mechanical function may be associated with adverse clinical

events such as atrial fibrillation, stroke, diastolic dysfunction and

LV failure, both in the general and the diabetic population.

6,8,10-14,19,20

Moreover, it has been reported that indexed V

max

32 ml/m

2

predicts cardiovascular mortality and morbidity independently

of myocardial perfusion sintigraphy-detected myocardial

ischaemia with a six-year follow-up period.

21

Cardiovascular imaging modalities for the determination of

LA function, such as computed tomography (CT), CMRI, 2D and

3D echocardiography, are evolving. Although the main advantage

of CMRI and CT over echocardiography is the determination of

all parts of the left atrium, including the LA appendage, the use

of iodine and radiation during CT and the usefulness of CMRI

in patients with pacemakers limit their usage.

7

Therefore, we

preferred to use 2D echocardiography, which is a non-invasive,

easy-to-use and accessible method to evaluate LA volume and

function. Moreover, similar to our findings, the mean indexed V

max

value was 23.6

±

5.8 ml/m

2

in a newly diagnosed diabetes group in

the study population of Zoppini.

14

The incidence of diastolic dysfunction in patients with DM2

is reported to be 43 to 75%.

4

Recent evidence suggests that

LA dilatation and dysfunction may be a co-existing marker of

diastolic dysfunction in patients with DM2.

4

However, Kadappu

et al.

demonstrated LA dilatation may be present in patients

with DM2 independent of diastolic dysfunction and associated

hypertension.

4

Recently, another study by Zoppini

et al

. reported

that diabetes itself might cause LA enlargement.

14

These findings

suggest that co-existing diabetic atrial cardiomyopathy may

independently alter the LA size and function.

4,14

In our study, 51.8% of the diabetic patients had some degree

of diastolic dysfunction with no difference regarding LA volume

and function, compared with the diabetic patients without

diastolic dysfunction. This finding and a weak correlation

between 2D echocardiographic diastolic parameters and LA

volume in our study may have been due to the duration of

DM2, normal LV filling pressures determined by E/E

ratio, and

normal LV mass.

We demonstrated that increasing age and BMI had a

significant effect on LA volume. The main difference of our

study from previous ones was the duration of DM2, which was

strongy and positively associated with larger LA diameter and

impaired LA function. CARDIA investigators showed a 20-year

follow-up period of diabetes was associated with indexed LA

Table 5. Correlation analysis of LA volume and function with

2D echocardiographic parameters and laboratory findings

Indexed

V

max

(ml/m²)

Indexed

V

olp

(ml/m²)

Indexed

V

min

(ml/m²)

Indexed

PEV

(ml/m²)

Indexed

AEV

(ml/m²)

Indexed

TEV

(ml/m²)

Glucose (mg/dl)

r

0.153 0.252 0.182 –0.034 0.204 0.075

P

0.108 0.007 0.055 0.725 0.031 0.429

HbA

1c

(%)

r

0.288 0.367 0.294 0.006 0.301 0.192

P

0.002

<

0.001 0.002 0.954 0.001 0.043

BMI (kg/m

2

)

r

0.430 0.441 0.368 0.135 0.340 0.325

P

<

0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.154

<

0.001

<

0.001

TG (mg/dl)

r

0.152 0.248 0.136 –0.047 0.239 0.089

p

0.110 0.008 0.153 0.625 0.011 0.350

hsCRP (mg/l)

r

0.412 0.420 0.320 0.103 0.371 0.308

p

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.001 0.281

<

0.001 0.001

Uric acid

r

0.362 0.378 0.297 0.125 0.283 0.253

(mg/dl)

p

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.001 0.190 0.002 0.007

Mitral A (cm/s)

r

0.328 0.380 0.292 –0.002 0.321 0.232

p

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.002 0.981 0.001 0.014

Mitral E

(cm/s)

r

–0.274 –0.258 –0.211 –0.094 –0.202 –0.226

p

0.003 0.006 0.026 0.323 0.033 0.017

Mitral A

(cm/s)

r

0.278 0.281 0.310 0.064 0.117 0.138

p

0.003 0.003 0.001 0.504 0.220 0.147

E/E

ratio (cm/s)

r

0.279 0.286 0.255 0.059 0.197 0.192

p

0.003 0.002 0.007 0.539 0.037 0.028

E/A ratio (cm/s)

r

0.085 0.129 0.288 –0.050 –0.135 –0.140

p

0.374 0.177 0.002 0.604 0.154 0.142

LA: left atrium, BMI: body mass index, TG: triglycerides, hsCRP: high-sensi-

tivity C-reactive protein, PEV: passive emptying volume, AEV: active emptying

volume, TEV: total emptying volume.

Table 6. Univariate and multivariate analysis for predictors of LA volume and function of the study population

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Parameters

DM2 HT HL Age

BMI hsCRP Uric acid DM HT HL Age

BMI hsCRP Uric acid

LA diameter (mm)

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.028

1

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.003 0.001

0.227 0.001 0.005 0.002

<

0.001 0.879 0.194

Indexed V

max

(ml/m²)

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.003

<

0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001

0.438 0.056 0.100 0.001 0.004 0.191 0.064

Indexed V

olp

(ml/m²)

<

0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001

0.991 0.181 0.244 0.003 0.016 0.226 0.042

Indexed V

min

(ml/m²)

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.007

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.001 0.001

0.869 0.171 0.334 0.069 0.099 0.371 0.034

Indexed PEV (ml/m²)

0.66 0.268 0.971 0.171 0.164 0.281 0.190

Indexed AEV (ml/m²)

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.001 0.001

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.002

0.822 0.623 0.476 0.010 0.064 0.383 0.486

Indexed TEV (ml/m²)

0.004 0.001 0.051

<

0.001

<

0.001 0.001 0.007

0.189 0.259 –

0.003 0.020 0.443 0.418

LA passive emptying

fraction (%)

0.003 0.052 0.011 0.169 0.044 0.065 0.338

0.150 –

0.438 –

0.897 –

LA active emptying

fraction (%)

0.386 0.769 0.499 0.393 0.718 0.430 0.968

LA total emptying

fraction (%)

0.05 0.117 0.162 0.293 0.148 0.395 0.363

DM: diabetes mellitus, HT: hypertension, HL: hyperlipidaemia, BMI: body mass index, hsCRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, LA: left atrium, PEV: passive

emptying volume, AEV: active emptying volume, TEV: total emptying volume.