Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 3, May/June 2018

142

AFRICA

patients with valvular AF and 13 among those with non-valvular

AF.

A total of 70 patients, among them two with valvular AF and

10 with non-valvular AF, were lost to follow up within six months

but were included in estimated rates as censored observations.

Four patients with valvular AF and 11 with non-valvular AF

were rehospitalised within 60 days; 16 patients in each group

were either rehospitalised or had died by day 60. The unadjusted

risk of 180-day mortality rate in patients with valvular AF was

twice that in patients with non-valvular AF [hazard ratio (HR)

2.11, 95% CI: 1.05–4.24,

p

=

0.032], while the unadjusted risks

of 60-day rehospitalisation did not differ significantly. Without

adjustment for potential confounding factors, neither valvular

nor non-valvular AF was associated with 60-day readmission,

while valvular but not non-valvular AF was associated with

180-day all-cause mortality (Table 5).

Adjustment for clinical characteristics found to be prognostic

of the outcomes

13

and therefore possible confounders had little

effect on these estimated associations. Valvular AF was not a

significant predictor of all-cause death or readmission within

60 days (Fig. 1) (HR 1.39, 95% CI: 0.80–2.42,

p

=

0.24) but

was associated with all-cause death within 180 days (HR 1.61,

95% CI: 0.99–2.62,

p

=

0.056) (Fig. 2). On the other hand,

non-valvular AF was not a significant predictor of either

all-cause death or readmission within 60 days (HR 0.99, 95%

CI: 0.58–1.68,

p

=

0.96) (Fig. 1) or the outcome all-cause death

within 180 days (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.39–1.26,

p

=

0.23) (Fig. 2).

Discussion

We found AF to be present in 20.8% of AHF patients. Forty-

four per cent of the patients with AF had valvular heart disease.

Sixty-one per cent of the patients with non-valvular AF had

hypertension. The presence of AF was not associated with the

primary endpoints, but having valvular AF predicted death

within 180 days.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first sub-Saharan

African study to assess the prevalence and clinical characteristics

Table 2. Baseline patient clinical characteristics

versus valvular and non-valvular AF

Variables

Valvular AF

1

(

n

=

92)

Non-valvular AF

1

(

n

=

115)

p

-value

2

Age (years)

52.2 (18.98),

52.0 (38.5–65.5)

60.8 (15.74),

64.0 (53.0–72.0)

0.0005

Gender: female,

n

(%)

59 (64.1)

60 (52.2)

0.0838

Black African,

n

(%)

91 (98.9)

111 (97.4)

0.4245

BMI (kg/m

2

)

24.89 (6.482),

24.76 (20.91–27.91)

24.90 (5.005),

24.52 (21.23–28.11)

0.7187

SBP (mmHg)

119.9 (24.39),

112.0 (100.0–133.0)

127.9 (33.38),

124.5 (108.0–150.0)

0.0699

DBP (mmHg)

78.4 (17.01),

79.0 (65.0–90.0)

82.2 (21.29),

80.0 (68.0–94.0)

0.2521

Heart rate

111.7 (29.68),

109.0 (92.0–127.0)

107.4 (26.86),

107.0 (90.0–120.0)

0.4319

History of

hypertension,

n

(%)

38 (41.8)

70 (60.9)

0.0064

Hyperlipidaemia,

n

(%)

4 (4.6)

4 (3.6)

0.7244

Stroke,

n

(%)

3 (3.3)

3 (2.6)

0.7706

Ischaemic heart

disease,

n

(%)

4 (4.3)

6 (5.2)

0.7719

Valvular disease,

n

(%)

92 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

< 0.0001

Peripheral vascular

disease,

n

(%)

2 (2.2)

1 (0.9)

0.4235

Anaemia,

n

(%)

46 (51.7)

51 (45.9)

0.4196

Pericardial disease,

n

(%)

3 (3.3)

6 (5.2)

0.5030

Cardiomyopathy,

n

(%)

29 (32.2)

50 (43.5)

0.1003

LVEF (%)

47.21 (14.440),

46.00 (40.00–58.00)

38.20 (15.506),

36.50 (27.00–45.70) < 0.0001

LVEF < 40%,

n

(%)

22 (24.7)

59 (55.7)

< 0.0001

eGFR

(ml/min/1.73 m

2

)

78.731 (39.738),

74.123 (48.772–92.796)

77.676 (40.914),

69.039 (49.709–100.88)

0.7990

Renal dysfunction,

n

(%)

4 (4.3)

6 (5.6)

0.6961

1

Mean (SD), median (first quartile – third quartile) for a continuous variable and

frequency (per cent) for a categorical variable.

1

Chi-squared

test

for a

categorical variable, CMH

for an ordinal variable and

Wilcoxon

test

for a

continuous variable.

BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pres-

sure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtra-

tion rate.

Table 3. Anticoagulation and aspirin use versus time

Parameters

1 month prior

to admission Admission

Day 30

6 months

Atrial fibrillation (

n

=

209)

Anticoagula-

tion,

n

(%)

16/136 (11.8) 107/205 (52.2) 31/116 (26.7) 22/101 (21.8)

Aspirin,

n

(%) 39/135 (28.9) 68/203 (33.5) 67/115 (58.3) 60/102 (58.8)

No atrial fibrillation (

n

=

797)

Anticoagula-

tion,

n

(%)

19/444 ( 4.3) 234/786 (29.8) 66/499 (13.3) 22/326 ( 6.8)

Aspirin,

n

(%) 88/443 (19.9) 283/784 (36.1) 303/499 (60.7) 189/327 (57.8)

p

-value

1

0.0013

< 0.0001

0.0003

< 0.0001

p

-value

2

0.0266

0.4905

0.6269

0.8546

Atrial fibrillation

Valvular (

n

=

92)

Anticoagula-

tion,

n

(%)

12/63 (19.0) 48/91 (52.8)

20/34 (58.8) 15/45 (33.3)

Aspirin,

n

(%) 20/63 (31.8) 33/90 (36.7)

13/33 (39.4) 28/46 (60.9)

Non-valvular (

n

=

115)

Anticoagula-

tion,

n

(%)

4/71 ( 5.6)

58/112 (51.8) 10/81 (12.4)

7/56 (12.5)

Aspirin,

n

(%) 18/70 (25.7) 34/111 (30.6) 54/81 (66.7) 32/56 (57.1)

p

-value

1

0.0168

0.8915

< 0.0001

0.0117

p

-value

2

0.4420

0.3667

0.0073

0.7035

1

Chi-squared test for comparison of anticoagulation use.

2

Chi-squared test for comparison of aspirin use.

Table 4. Outcomes versus valvular disease status

in patients with atrial fibrillation

Variable

Valvular

atrial

fibrillation

(

n

=

92)

Non-valvular

atrial

fibrillation

(

n

=

115)

Effect

(95% CI

3

)

p

-value

Length of index

hospitalisation

1

11.2

9.6

1.63

(–0.56–3.83)

0.1438

Rehospitalisation

within 60 days

2

6.0

11.3

0.48

(0.15–1.52)

0.2046

Death within 180 days

2

24.8

13.2

2.11

(1.05–4.24)

0.0320

Death or rehospitalisa-

tion within 60 days

2

19.1

15.5

1.32

(0.66–2.65)

0.4268

1

LS means: difference presented for length of index hospitalisation.

2

Kaplan–Meier event rate.

3

Hazard

ratio

from Cox

regression model presented for rehospitalisation, death,

and death/rehospitalisation outcome.