Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  34 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 4, July/August 2019

220

AFRICA

dependence, unlike traditional echocardiographic parameters, it

is able to detect subclinical longitudinal RV dysfunction.

The decreased RV free-wall PSS with preserved traditional

markers of RV systolic function in this study implies subclinical

RV dysfunction. The mechanism of reduced RV strain in this

study may be related to the elevated PASP, as the RV is known

to be extremely sensitive to afterload.

26,28

Even small increases

in pulmonary vascular resistance can markedly decrease

RV contractile function. Prior studies have noted a similar

relationship between RV systolic performance and pulmonary

hypertension in degenerative MR.

5,6

Le Torneau

et al

. have shown in their study that, even though

increased RV afterload secondary to PHT was an important

cause of RV dysfunction in MR, LV dysfunction also contributed

significantly to RV dysfunction, due to their interdependent

relationship.

5

In this study PASP was only modestly elevated

but the markers of LV remodelling and systolic function such

as LVGLS, LVEDD and S

velocity were markedly abnormal.

Therefore, in agreement with Le Torneau

et al

.,

5

LV remodelling

and LV dysfunction, in addition to the modest elevation in

PASP, may be important causes of RV functional impairment

in CRMR.

This is supported by the finding of reduced RV free-wall PSS

in patients with LVEF

<

60% and reduced LVGLS. Additionally,

most patients had abnormal RV free-wall PSS in the presence of

abnormal LVGLS, and those with normal RV free-wall PSS also

had normal LVGLS. However, conventional RV systolic function

parameters were still preserved even in the presence of LV

systolic dysfunction. Hence, once abnormalities in LV systolic

function are noted in MR, systematic RV function assessment

must be done with not only traditional parameters but also

STE, in order to detect subclinical RV dysfunction and reduce

mortality associated with biventricular functional impairment.

5

Severe MR was associated with worse RV function and was

found to be a determinant of RVPSS in a study by Le Torneau

et al

.

5

Volume overload as a result of chronic MR results in LV

remodelling, as noted in our study, and this in turn results in

abnormalities of RV and LV interaction. RV free-wall PSS was

lower in patients with severe MR compared to moderate MR. This

association can be explained by greater chronic volume overload

of the LV and left atrium, accompanied by increased PASP

secondary to backward transmission of increased LV pressure,

as well as remodelling of the pulmonary vasculature in severe

compared to moderate MR.

30

However, a lack of difference in

traditional RV systolic function parameters between the moderate

and severe MR groups was present, and therefore quantitative

RV function assessment in CRMR mandates evaluation by both

conventional indices and RV longitudinal strain.

TR was an independent predictor of RV free-wall PSS.

Significant TR is likely a reflection of deteriorating RV function

secondary to left-sided disease. The increase in RV preload

initially results in increased RV free-wall PSS due to increased

myocardial lengthening in diastole and shortening in systole.

Once RV myocardial contractile dysfunction ensues, however,

RV systolic strain declines, as RV reaches the descending limb of

the Frank–Starling curve.

Finally, the decline in RV free-wall PSS may be partially

attributed to primary RV dysfunction. The intrinsic myocardial

functional abnormalitymay be a result of longstanding activation

of neuro-hormonal pathways and increased afterload secondary

to chronic mitral regurgitation.

8,26

We further speculate that

there may be direct involvement of the RV myocardium by the

rheumatic process.

This study had two limitations: first, lack of reference

standard for RV functional assessment such as additional

imaging in the form of cardiac MRI and three-dimensional

echocardiography, and second, we did not routinely perform

right and left heart catheterisation to assess PASP, pulmonary

vascular resistance and coronary anatomy.

Conclusion

In CRMR patients, RV free-wall PSS was a more sensitive marker

for detecting earlier RV systolic dysfunction than traditional

RV functional parameters. LVGLS and TR were important

determinants of RV free-wall PSS in CRMR.

The first author was the recipient of the Carnegie PhD Fellowship award

(Carnegie Corporation grant no. b8749.r01).

References

1.

Lang RM, Plank C, Sadushi-Kolici R, Jakowitsch J, KlepetkoW, Maurer

G. Imaging in pulmonary hypertension.

J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc

Imaging

2010;

3

(12): 1287–1295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.09.013.

2.

Anavekar NS, Skali H, Bourgoun M, Ghali JK, Kober L, Maggioni AP,

et al

. Usefulness of right ventricular fractional area change to predict

death, heart failure, and stroke following myocardial infarction (from

the VALIANT ECHO Study).

Am J Cardiol

2008;

101

(5): 607–612.

DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.09.115.

3.

Damy T, Viallet C, Lairez O, Deswarte G, Paulino A, Maison P,

et al

.

Comparison of four right ventricular systolic echocardiographic param-

eters to predict adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure.

Eur J Heart

Fail

2009;

11

(9): 818–824. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp111.

4.

De Groote P, Fertin M, Goéminne C, Petyt G, Peyrot S, Foucher-

Hossein C,

et al.

Right ventricular systolic function for risk stratification

in patients with stable left ventricular systolic dysfunction: comparison

of radionuclide angiography to echo Doppler parameters.

Eur Heart J

2012;

33

(21): 2672–2679. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs080.

5.

Le Tourneau T, Deswarte G, Lamblin N, Foucher-Hossein C, Fayad

G, Richardson M,

et al

. Right ventricular systolic function in organic

mitral regurgitation: impact of biventricular impairment.

Circulation

2013;

127

: 1597–608. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000999.

6.

Hyllén S, Nozohoor S, Ingvarsson A, Meurling C, Wierup P, Sjögren J.

Right ventricular performance after valve repair for chronic degenera-

tive mitral regurgitation.

Ann Thorac Surg

2014;

98

(6): 2023–2030. DOI:

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.075.

7.

Maffessanti F, Gripari P, Tamborini G, Muratori M, Fusini L, Alamanni

F,

et al

. Evaluation of right ventricular systolic function after mitral

valve repair: a two-dimensional Doppler, speckle-tracking, and three-

dimensional echocardiographic study.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr

2012;

25

(7): 701–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.03.017.

8.

Polak JF, Holman BL, Wynne J, Colucci WS. Right ventricular ejection

fraction: an indicator of increased mortality in patients with congestive

heart failure associated with coronary artery disease.

J Am Coll Cardiol

1983;

2

(2): 217–224. PMID: 6306086.

9.

Grose R, Strain J, Yipintosoi T. Right ventricular function in valvular

heart disease: relation to pulmonary artery pressure.

J Am Coll Cardiol

1983;

2

(2): 225–232. PMID: 6408152.

10. Kumar V, Jose VJ, Pati PK, Jose J. Assessment of right ventricular strain