Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  29 / 70 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 70 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 5, September/October 2019

AFRICA

271

Table 1 shows the gating characteristics of the two groups.

Compared with baseline, in the three minutes of simulated

ischaemia, the curves of activation and inactivation were shifted

negatively (Fig. 5A–D), and

K

a

and

τ

were decreased in both

groups (Table 1, Fig. 5A, B, E, F). At three minutes of simulated

ischaemia,

K

i

in the statin group was lower than in the control

group (

p

<

0.05), and

τ

in the statin group was higher than in the

control group (

p

<

0.05; Table 1, Fig. 5C–F).

Discussion

Sodium current plays an important role in ischaemic ventricular

arrhythmias, which may affect cardiac conductivity and

irritation.

3

Previous studies have shown that sodium current may

decrease in the ischaemic state,

5

but in our study, the current

transiently increased in the early stage of ischaemia. Ventricular

arrhythmias mainly appear in acute myocardial ischaemia in two

time periods after birth (0–0.5 and 1.5–9 hours).

12

In view of the relationship between ischaemic time and

the degree of injury, we hypothesised that the change of

I

Na

in

simulated ischaemia may be time-dependent. To observe the

instantaneous change in

I

Na

, the measurement time interval

was shortened to two minutes. The results showed that

I

Na

was

transiently increased and peaked at three minutes after simulated

ischaemia. At this time, the

V

1/2,a

and

V

1/2,i

were both decreased,

which represented the activation and inactivation thresholds,

respectively, and meant that both the activation and inactivation

processes would be much easier at the early stage of ischaemia.

In addition, decreased

K

a

and

τ

indicated that the processes of

channel activation and recovery had been changed much faster

(Fig. 5).

In summary, these changed gating characteristics indicated

that channel transition between open and closed states became

more frequent, and the open probability of sodium channels

per unit time had been increased. Since

I

m

=

i P

0

N

(where

I

m

is the whole-cell current,

i

is the single-channel current,

P

0

is

the open probability, and

N

is the number of channels),

13

the

whole-cell

I

Na

had been consequently increased at three minutes

of simulated ischaemia. However, this experiment also showed

Fig. 4.

Time trend of normalised

I

Na

at –40-mV test potential.

When entering the simulated ischaemic stage, the

normalised

I

Na

in the control group was transiently

increased during the first three to seven minutes, and

then attenuated rapidly, while in the statin group, the

normalised

I

Na

gradually decreased during the whole

of the simulated ischaemia.

Fig. 3.

Current–voltage (I–V) curves between baseline and ischaemia for three minutes. (A) I–V curve of control group, which was

down-shifted in the very early stage of ischaemia, and represented the increase of

I

Na

at the test potential from –55 to 50 mV.

(B) I–V curve of statin group, which was little changed in the early ischaemic condition, compared to the baseline.

A

B

Table 1. Gating characteristics at three minutes of simulated ischaemia (

x

±

s

)

Activation (

n

=

8)

Inactivation (

n

=

8)

Resurrection

(

n

=

9)

V

1/2,a

(mV)

K

a

(mV)

V

1/2,i

(mV)

K

i

(mV)

τ

(ms)

Control group

Baseline (A

1

) –54.91

±

4.22 1.45

±

0.48 –62.84

±

2.50 4.52

±

0.97 34.23

±

4.40

Ischaemia (B

1

) –58.82

±

3.65 0.90

±

0.31 –65.19

±

3.33 4.28

±

1.11 25.54

±

6.41

Value of B

1

–A

1

–3.90

±

2.16 –0.55

±

0.44 –2.35

±

1.71 –0.23

±

0.38 –8.69

±

4.75

p

(A

1

:B

1

)

0.0014

0.0090

0.0061

0.1238

0.0006

Statin group

Baseline (A

2

) –54.70

±

3.54* 1.41

±

0.65* –63.33

±

2.24* 4.92

±

0.55* 34.58

±

8.55*

Ischemia (B

2

) –59.16

±

3.53 1.03

±

0.58 –66.45

±

1.91 4.12

±

0.56 30.22

±

9.65

Value of B

2

–A

2

–4.47

±

1.97 –0.38

±

0.35 –3.12

±

1.00 –0.81

±

0.35

–4.36

±

4.82

p

(A

2

:B

2

)

0.0004

0.0169

0.0000

0.0004

0.0263

Compared with the baseline of the control group, *

p

>

0.2, and compared with the

value of B

1

–A

1

,

p

<

0.05.