Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 66 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 32, No 3, May/June 2021

126

AFRICA

The mean concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

(hs-CRP) at baseline was significantly higher in the ACS group

than in the stable-angina group (1.21 ± 3.73 vs 0.49 ± 1.46 mg/dl,

respectively,

p

= 0.023). However, six months after the initiation

of the CR programme, the mean hs-CRP concentration was

significantly decreased in both groups and was not significantly

different between groups (0.21 ± 0.39 vs 0.24 ± 0.49 mg/dl,

respectively,

p

= 0.989). The target goal for the mean low-density

lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration (88.0 ± 28.5 mg/dl;

2.28 ± 0.74 mmol/l) for the ACS group was not reached despite

efforts, such as high-intensity statin therapy, used to control it.

Discussion

In this study we showed that endothelial function, measured by

FMD, was improved in patients with coronary artery disease

who underwent PCI, regardless of ACS or stable angina after

a six-month CR programme. However, there was no significant

difference in the improvement of the FMD values between the

two groups. The ACS patients tended to have lower FMD values

before CR, compared to the patients with stable angina.

Endothelial function is an ‘excellent barometer’ of vascular

health and can be used to gauge cardiovascular risk.

9

A

pathogenic link between coronary endothelial dysfunction and

cardiovascular events was found almost simultaneously by

Suwaidi

et al

.

11

and Schächinger

et al

.

8

The FMD result reflects

the relaxation of a conduit artery when it is exposed to increased

flow and increased shear stress.

14

Numerous studies have documented the various effects

of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular disease. In 2004,

Hambrecht

et al

. reported that when patients with stable coronary

artery disease participated in a 12-month programme of regular

physical exercise, they had superior event-free survival and

exercise capacity, and at lower cost, compared to patients treated

with PCI.

15

Many investigators have used FMD to evaluate the

post-CR improvement in endothelial function in patients with

coronary heart disease. Morikawa

et al

. suggested that exercise

training improves endothelial dysfunction in patients with

coronary spastic angina, and they found a significant correlation

between the reduction in attack frequency and the improvement

in FMD.

4

Recently, Ades

et al

. found that there was a dose–response

relationship between weight loss and endothelial-dependent

FMD in patients with serious coronary heart disease who

participated in a CR programme.

1

Weight loss and exercise

in overweight patients resulted in a significant improvement

in FMD. Their results suggested that the best predictor of

the improvement in FMD is weight loss per se, rather than

related measures, such as changes in fat mass, visceral fat, waist

circumference or insulin sensitivity.

1

The initial mean body mass

index (BMI) of their study population was 32.3 ± 4.1 kg/m

2

,

which was larger than that of our study population (24.9 ± 2.6

kg/m

2

). However, we found that there was an improvement in

FMD values after exercise training, even though most of the

Baseline

After 6 months

VO

2max

(ml/kg/min)

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

p

< 0.001

94

Stable angina

Acute coronary syndrome

VO

2max

(ml/kg/min)

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

p

= 0.003

p

= 0.001

Baseline

After 6 months

p

= 0.422

p

= 0.385

Fig. 2.

Changes of VO

2max

before and after a six-month CR programme. A. All patients. B. Patients with stable angina versus ACS.

Table 3. Changes in biochemical parameters after a CR programme

Parameters

Total

Stable angina

ACS

Baseline

6 months

Baseline

6 months

Baseline

6 months

hs-CRP

0.87 ± 2.90

0.23 ± 0.44

*

0.49 ± 1.46

0.21 ± 0.39

*

1.21 ± 3.73

0.24 ± 0.49

*

HDL-C

42.4 ± 8.9

40.4 ± 8.0

*

44.7 ± 8.9

41.8 ± 8.3

*

40.7 ± 8.6

39.4 ± 7.8

*

LDL-C

116.9 ± 30.7

82.7 ± 24.7

**

115.3 ± 31.2

74.3 ± 13.8

**

118.2 ± 30.5

88.0 ± 28.5

**‡

HbA

1c

(%)

6.5 ± 1.5

6.5 ± 1.4

6.2 ± 1.1

5.7 ± 0.4

6.6 ± 1.7

6.8 ± 1.6

Data are expressed as numbers (%) and means ± SD. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein

cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Baseline versus six months; *

p

< 0.05, **

p

< 0.01, stable angina versus ACS;

p

< 0.05,

p

< 0.01.