Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  46 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 4, July/August 2016

248

AFRICA

and waist–hip ratio were considerably higher in the case groups

than the controls (

p

<

0.05) (Table 1). In subgroup analyses,

RDW was significantly increased in group I compared with

group II and the controls (

p

=

0.003 and

p

<

0.001, respectively),

although there was no statistically significant change between

group II and the controls (

p

>

0.05) (Table 2, Fig. 2).

Aortic PWV was significantly higher in group I than in group

II and the controls (

p

<

0.001 for both); however, it was similar

in group II and the controls (

p

>

0.05). Although age was similar

in group II and the controls (

p

>

0.05), it was considerably

higher in group I than in group II (

p

=

0.046). While BMI and

waist–hip ratio were significantly higher in groups I and II than

in the controls, as expected (

p

<

0.001), there was no statistically

significant difference between groups I and II (

p

>

0.05) (Table 2).

Bivariate correlation analyses showed positive correlations of

log-RDW, resting heart rate, age and BMI with aortic PWV (

p

<

0.001,

p

<

0.001,

p

=

0.022, and

p

=

0.007, respectively) (Table

3, Fig. 3A–C). Also, there was a positive correlation between

log-RDW and BMI (Fig. 3D). However, multiple regression

analyses (stepwise) using variables with significant correlation

revealed that log-RDW, resting heart rate and age independently

predicted aortic PWV. Of these, log-RDWwas a stronger predictor

than age and resting heart rate in the final model (Table 3).

Discussion

The main findings of this community-based, prospective study

were: (1) the subjects with high aortic PWV had advanced

age, increased RDW and increased resting heart rate; (2) these

parameters were positively correlated with aortic PWV; and

(3) log-RDW, resting heart rate and age were independent

predictors for increased aortic stiffness (aortic PWV

10 m/s),

Table 1. Comparison of case group with control group

Parameters

Case group

(

n

=

101)

Control group

(

n

=

48)

p-

value

Male,

n

(%)

72 (71)

32 (67)

0.566

Age, years

38

±

11

37

±

7

0.564

Body mass index, kg/m

2

28.8

±

3.3

22.4

±

1.6

<

0.001

Waist–hip ratio

0.91

±

0.10

0.82

±

0.07

<

0.001

Systolic blood pressure, mmHg

121

±

9

120

±

8

0.655

Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg

78

±

5

77

±

6

0.110

Resting heart rate, beats/min

77

±

11

76

±

12

0.719

Aortic pulse wave velocity, m/s

9.9

±

2.0

9.1

±

2.3

0.027

Aortic augmentation index 75, % 19

±

11

17

±

12

0.275

Fasting glucose, mg/dl

(mmol/l)

90

±

5

(5

±

0.28)

88

±

6

(4.88

±

0.33)

0.056

Urea, mg/dl

28

±

5

26

±

5

0.058

Creatinine, mg/dl

0.80

±

0.08

0.78

±

0.08 0.175

(mmol/l)

(70.72

±

7.07)

(68.95

±

7.07)

Alanine aminotransferase, U/l

26

±

5

24

±

4

0.059

Triglycerides, mg/dl

150

±

19

149

±

21

0.919

(mmol/l)

(1.70

±

0.21)

(1.68

±

0.24)

Total cholesterol, median (IQR),

mg/dl

177 (128–244)

176 (116–227)

0.201*

(mmol/l)

[4.58 (3.32–6.32)] [4.56 (3.0–5.88)]

LDL cholesterol, mg/dl

109

±

19

102

±

17

0.154

(mmol/l)

(2.82

±

0.49)

(2.64

±

0.44)

HDL cholesterol, median (IQR),

mg/dl

42 (33–52)

42 (38–53)

0.184*

(mmol/l)

[1.09 (0.85–1.35)] [1.09 (0.98–1.37)]

RDW, median (IQR), %

11.9 (10.2–17.5) 11.4 (9.6–15.5) 0.005*

White blood cell, 10

3

/µl

8.1

±

1.6

7.6

±

1.6

0.086

Haematocrit, %

44

±

5

43

±

5

0.219

IQR: interquartile range; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density

lipoprotein; RDW: red cell distribution width.

*

p

-value of Mann–Whitney

U

-test.

13.50

13.00

12.50

12.00

11.50

11.00

Group I

Group II

Control

Groups

95% CI, red cell distribution width, %

p

>

0.05

p

=

0.003

p

<

0.001

Fig. 2.

The error bar graph showing RDW difference between

the groups. RDW: red cell distribution width.

Table 2. Comparison of variables between the three groups

Parameters

Group I

(

n

=

47)

Group II

(

n

=

54)

Control

(

n

=

48)

Males,

n

(%)

34 (72)

34 (63)

32 (67)

Age, years

41

±

12

a

36

±

9

37

±

7

Body mass index, kg/m

2

29.1

±

3.4

b

28.3

±

2.9

c

22.4

±

1.6

Waist–hip ratio

0.94

±

0.10

b

0.90

±

0.09

c

0.82

±

0.07

Systolic blood pressure,

mmHg

122

±

8

120

±

10

120

±

8

Diastolic blood pressure,

mmHg

80

±

5

78

±

6

77

±

6

Resting heart rate, beats/min

81

±

11

74

±

12

a

76

±

12

Aortic pulse wave velocity, m/s 11.6

±

1.4

a,b

8.4

±

0.9

9.0

±

2.3

Aortic augmentation index

75, %

23

±

13

17

±

9

17

±

12

Fasting glucose, mg/dl

90

±

5

89

±

6

88

±

6

(mmol/l)

(5

±

0.28)

(4.94

±

0.33)

(4.88

±

0.33)

Urea, mg/dl

28

±

5

28

±

4

26

±

5

Creatinine, mg/dl

0.81

±

0.06

0.80

±

0.09

0.78

±

0.08

(mmol/l)

(71.60

±

5.30)

(70.72

±

7.96)

(68.95

±

7.07)

Alanine aminotransferase, U/l

25

±

5

27

±

4

24

±

4

Triglycerides, mg/dl

150

±

19

148

±

17

149

±

21

(mmol/l)

(1.70

±

0.21)

(1.67

±

0.19)

(1.68

±

0.24)

Total cholesterol, median

(IQR), mg/dl

177 (128–244)

178 (136–223)

176 (116–227)

(mmol/l)

[4.58 (3.32–6.32)] [4.61 (3.52–5.78)] [4.56 (3.0–5.88)]

LDL cholesterol, mg/dl

106

±

18

108

±

18

102

±

17

(mmol/l)

(2.75

±

0.47)

(2.80

±

0.47)

(2.64

±

0.44)

HDL cholesterol, median

(IQR), mg/dl

41 (34–52)

42 (33–48)

42 (38–53)

(mmol/l)

[1.06 (0.88–1.35)] [1.09 (0.85–1.24)] [1.09 (0.98–1.37)]

RDW, median (IQR), % 12.0 (10.5–17.5)

a,b

11.7 (10.2–14.2) 11.4 (9.6–15.5)

White blood cell, 10

3

/µl

8.3

±

1.7

7.9

±

1.6

7.6

±

1.6

Haematocrit, %

44

±

7

45

±

4

43

±

5

Group I: pulse-wave velocity

10 m/s; group II: pulse-wave velocity

<

10 m/s; IQR:

interquartile range; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein;

RDW: red cell distribution width.

a

p

<

0.05 between group I and II;

b

p

<

0.05 between group I and control;

c

p

<

0.05

between group II and control.