CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 4, July/August 2016
AFRICA
261
atrioventricular conduction in patients with atrial septal defect – ostium
secundum type.
Cardiol Young
2013;
23
: 132–137.
4.
Pac FA, Balli S, Topaloglu S, Ece I, Oflaz MB. Analysis of maximum
P-wave duration and dispersion after percutaneous closure of atrial
septal defects: comparison of two septal occluders.
Anadolu Kardiyol
Derg
2012;
12
: 249–254.
5.
Ozyilmaz I, Ozyilmaz S, Tola HT, Saygi M, Kiplapinar N, Tanıdır C,
et al
. Holter electrocardiography findings and P-wave dispersion in
pediatric patients with transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects.
Ann
Noninvasive Electrocardiol
2014;
19
: 174–181.
6.
Johnson JN, Marquardt ML, Ackerman MJ, Asirvatham SJ, Reeder
GS, Cabalka AK,
et al.
Electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias
following percutaneous atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale
device closure.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
2011;
78
: 254–261.
7.
Baspinar O, Sucu M, Koruk S, Kervancioglu M, Ustunsoy H, Deniz H,
et al
. P-wave dispersion between transcatheter and surgical closure of
secundum-type atrial septal defect in childhood.
Cardiol Young
2011;
21
: 15–18.
8.
Berger F, Vogel M, Kramer A, Alexi-Meskishvili V, Weng Y, Lange PE,
et al.
Incidence of atrial flutter/fibrillation in adults with atrial septal
defect before and after surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg
1999;
68
: 75–78.
9.
Gatzoulis MA, Freeman MA, Siu SC, Webb GD, Harris L. Atrial
arrhythmia after surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults.
N Engl
J Med
1999;
340
: 839–846.
10. Fang F, Luo XX, Lin QS, Kwong JS, Zhang YC, Jiang X,
et al
.
Characterization of mid-term atrial geometrical and electrical remod-
eling following device closure of atrial septal defects in adults.
Int J
Cardiol
2013;
168
: 467–471.
11. Thilen U, Carlson J, Platonov PG, Olsson SB. Atrial myocardial
pathoelectrophysiology in adults with a secundum atrial septal defect is
unaffected by closure of the defect. A study using high resolution signal-
averaged orthogonal P-wave technique.
Int J Cardiol
2009;
132
: 364–368.
12. Morton JB, Sanders P, Vohra JK, Sparks PB, Morgan JG, Spence SJ,
et
al
. Effect of chronic right atrial stretch on atrial electrical remodeling in
patients with an atrial septal defect.
Circulation
2003;
107
: 1775–1782.
13. Thilen U, Carlson J, Platonov PG, Havmöller R, Olsson SB. Prolonged
P wave duration in adults with secundum atrial septal defect: a marker
of delayed conduction rather than increased atrial size?
Europace
2007;
9
(Suppl 6): 105–108.
14. Murphy JG, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, Mair DD, Porter CJ, Ilstrup DM,
et al
. Long-term outcome after surgical repair of isolated atrial septal
defect. Follow-up at 27 to 32 years.
N Engl J Med
1990;
323
: 1645–1650.
15. Yavuz T, Nisli K, Oner N, Dindar A, Aydogan U, Omeroglu RE,
et
al.
The effects of surgical repair on P-wave dispersion in children with
secundum atrial septal defect.
Adv Ther
2008;
25
: 795–800.
16. Oliver JM, Gallego P, González A, Benito F, Mesa JM, Sobrino JA.
Predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation in atrial septal defect with
and without operative closure.
Am J Cardiol
2002;
89
: 39–43.
Diabetes is often overlooked after a myocardial infarction
At least 10% of people who have a myocardial infarction (MI)
may also have undiagnosed diabetes. Yet many doctors fail to
look for diabetes in these patients, a recent study has found.
Dr Suzanne Arnold, assistant professor at Saint Luke’s
Mid-America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri
in Kansas City, and her team studied data from 2 854 patients
who experienced an MI and had never been diagnosed with
type 2 diabetes. The study tested the patients’ HbA
1c
levels.
It revealed that doctors often failed to recognise and begin
treating diabetes in patients who have experienced MIs with
no prior history of diabetes, even when the patient tested
positive for diabetes. The researchers found that 287 or
10.1% of the patients who experienced MIs tested positive
for diabetes. Out of the 287 patients who tested positive for
diabetes, less than one-third received education or medication
when discharged from hospital.
According to the results, doctors failed to recognise
diabetes in 198 or 69% of the previously undiagnosed
patients. The researchers noted that when a patient’s HbA
1c
test results were checked while they were being treated for
their MI, there was a 17-fold greater chance that the diabetes
would be diagnosed.
In a press release, Dr Arnold stated, ‘Diagnosing diabetes
in patients who have had a heart attack is important because
of the role diabetes plays in heart disease. By recognising and
treating diabetes early, we may be able to prevent additional
cardiovascular complications through diet, weight loss and
lifestyle changes, in addition to taking medications. Another
important reason to diagnose diabetes at the time of heart
attack is that it can guide the treatments for the patient’s
coronary artery disease.’
According to Dr Arnold and her team, two in three
patients with diabetes die from heart-related conditions.
Patients with diabetes experience a significantly higher risk
for MI. The authors concluded that people who have an MI
should ask for a diabetes test if they present with other risk
factors such as being overweight, having high blood pressure
or a family history of diabetes.
This study was presented on 3 June at the American
Heart Association’s Quality of Care and Outcomes Research
Scientific Sessions 2014.
Reference
1.
http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/articles/diabetes-news/16453-diabetes-often-times-overlooked-after-heart-attack.