Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  65 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 65 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 4, July/August 2016

AFRICA

267

cardiovascular burden that black populations carry,

10,11

our

results suggest that treatment that effectively lowers central

pressure may also significantly lower the risk for stroke and other

cardiovascular events.

Our results were similar for treated and untreated

hypertensives; therefore treatment seems to be largely ineffective

in this population. Indeed, the treatment and control of

hypertension in low-income countries are largely inadequate

despite half of those sampled being aware of their condition.

14,30

South Africa has one of the highest hypertension rates (78%)

for people over 50 years of age, but only 38% are aware of

their hypertensive status and only 7.8% of those treated for

hypertension have controlled hypertension.

14

It therefore remains

to be seen whether effective anti-hypertensive treatment in black

Africans will result in improved carotid distensibility.

Surprisingly, the IMT was similar between the two groups

after adjustments, suggesting a lack of visible structural changes

in the hypertensive blacks. IMT is an important marker of the

atherosclerotic burden of the carotid artery,

31

but it may also

indicate non-atherosclerotic compensatory remodelling of the

arterial wall in response to hypertension.

32

However, neither of

these possibilities seems to be the case in this black population.

On the other hand, IMT was independently associated with

cSBP in the hypertensive group only, therefore suggesting that

the continued high pulsatile load of uncontrolled hypertension

may eventually mediate structural changes in the carotid artery.

This result shows a similar trend to the findings of Wang

et al.

,

33

confirming the relevance of central blood pressure to IMT.

We observed no differences in the inflammatory and

endothelial activation markers, lipid levels and glycaemic status

between the normotensives and hypertensives. Africans are

generally not prone to atherosclerosis and coronary heart

disease,

34

and exhibit a favourable lipid profile,

35,36

possibly

explaining the similar lipid levels between the two groups.

However, our results confirm the commonly found association

between IMT and LDL-C level,

37,38

and an association between

CD and HbA

1c

level in the hypertensive group only.

Although we did not observe structural differences after

adjustment for cSBP, these results suggest glucose metabolism

and lipid abnormalities may play a role in the arterial changes,

although these are not yet detectable with ultrasound.

Inflammation and endothelial activation (as indicated by the

adhesionmolecules) may not play amajor role in the mediation of

central arterial stiffness at this stage of disease progression. These

results are unexpected in the light of previous findings, which

indicate that acute and chronic inflammation are associated with

stiffness of the large arteries,

39

and that endothelial activation

may be an important mediator of hypertensive vascular injury.

40

The findings of this study should be interpreted in the context

of its limitations and strengths. Our study population consisted

of individuals from specific urban and rural areas in the North

West Province of South Africa, and may not be representative

of the whole population. We were not able to use echo-tracking

techniques to determine local arterial stiffness in our field

study; however, the procedures of ultrasound assessment are

standardised

41

and were performed by a single reader in a large

study population. Carotid distensibility was calculated with a

formula that includes cSBP, and we adjusted for cSBP. However,

neither direct measurements such as IMT nor indirect variables

such as carotid distensibility differed after adjustments for

cSBP. Due to the cross-sectional study design, causality cannot

be inferred. Although the results were consistent after several

adjustments, we cannot exclude residual confounding.

Conclusion

Although differences existed in terms of carotid structure and

function between the normotensive and hypertensive Africans, it

seemed to be partially accounted for by the increased distending

pressure of the hypertensive group. Despite their hypertensive

status, structural adaptations, such as IMT thickening, were

not detectable in this African population after adjustment for

potential confounders, and even before cSBP or MAP were

taken into account. The classic cardiometabolic risk factors,

markers of inflammation, endothelial activation and health

behaviour seemed to play only a minor role in the mediation of

carotid distensibility in this population at this stage of disease

Table 7. Forward stepwise multiple regression analyses

with CSWA and max LD as dependent variables

Normotensives

(

n

=

241)

β

(95% CI)

p

-value

Hypertensives

(

n

=

351)

β

(95% CI)

p

-value

CSWA (mm

2

)

Adjusted

R

2

0.23

0.32

Locality (urban)

–0.11 (–0.21– –0.01) 0.022

Gender (male)

0.29 (0.15–0.42)

<

0.001 0.26 (0.15–0.37)

<

0.001

Age, years

0.29 (0.17–0.42)

<

0.001 0.43 (0.30–0.57)

<

0.001

Waist circumfer-

ence, cm

0.18 (0.05–0.31)

0.008 0.02 (–0.12–0.17)

0.77

Central SBP, mm

Hg

0.18 (0.08–0.28)

<

0.001

LDL-C, mmol/l

0.12 (0.01–0.23)

0.026

HbA

1c

(%)

0.08 (–0.02–0.19)

0.13

Creatinine clear-

ance, ml/min

0.11 (–0.05–0.26)

0.18

C-reactive protein,

pg/ml

0.16 (0.02–0.29)

0.025 0.09 (–0.01–0.20)

0.090

γ

-glutamyl transfer-

ase, U/l

0.11 (–0.02–0.24)

0.10 –0.08 (–0.18–0.02)

0.11

Anti-hypertension

medication (yes)

–0.12 (–0.22– –0.02) 0.013

Max LD (mm)

Adjusted

R

2

0.27

0.10

Locality (urban)

–0.08 (–0.21–0.05)

0.21

Gender (male)

0.26 (0.10–0.42)

0.001 0.22 (0.08–0.36)

0.002

Age, years

0.13 (–0.03–0.29)

0.12

Waist circumfer-

ence, cm

0.14 (-0.005–0.28)

0.061

Central SBP,

mmHg

0.20 (0.05–0.35)

0.010 0.14 (0.007–0.27)

0.039

Heart rate, bpm –0.09 (–0.24–0.06)

0.22

LDL-C, mmol/l

–0.16 (–0.30– –0.02) 0.027 –0.14 (–0.2– –0.003) 0.045

Creatinine clear-

ance, ml/min

0.21 (0.05–0.37)

0.011

C-reactive protein,

pg/ml

0.09 (–0.05–0.23)

0.23

ICAM-1, pg/ml

0.16 (0.01–0.30)

0.037 0.08 (–0.05–0.21)

0.25

γ

-glutamyl transfer-

ase, U/l

0.17 (0.03–0.32)

0.023

Data expressed as beta-values and 95% confidence intervals,

p

-values obtained

with forward stepwise multiple regression analyses.

Included in each model: locality, age, gender, WC, HR, cSBP, LDL-C, HbA

1c

,

C-reactive protein, ICAM-1, creatinine clearance,

γ

-glutamyl transferase, tobacco

and anti-hypertensive medication use.

CSWA, cross-sectional wall area; Max LD, maximum lumen diameter; SBP, systol-

ic blood pressure; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA

1c

, glycated

haemoglobin; ICAM-1,intracellular adhesion molecule-1.