Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  10 / 80 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 80 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 3, May/June 2017

144

AFRICA

Discussion

It has been demonstrated that vascular oxidative stress plays an

important role in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension,

21

and many experimental studies have been published using

anti-oxidants to prevent the development of hypertension or

to decrease blood pressure. Hu

et al

.

22

showed that apocynin

[a nicotinamide dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase

inhibitor] application prevented and reversed dexamethasone-

induced (via NADPH oxidase-mediated superoxide production)

hypertension in rats. Another study revealed that tempol [a

superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetic] application decreased

blood pressure and renal vascular resistance in spontaneously

hypertensive rats by eliminating unfavourable peroxynitrite

formation from the superoxide by competition with NO.

23

We aimed to investigate the effects of RSV in preventing

the development of hypertension, which was induced by NOS

inhibition. RSV application alone did not alter blood pressure

in the normotensive rats. Application of RSV plus L-NNA did

not reverse the blood pressure increase induced by L-NNA. This

may have been related to the dose of RSV or the length of the

application period. Various protocols have been used in other

studies.

Bhatt

et al

.

24

gave RSV dissolved in drinking water to

rats at a concentration of 50 mg/l for 10 weeks and revealed

that the development of hypertension was attenuated in the

spontaneously hypertensive rats. Gordish

et al.

25

administered

RSV at a dose of 5 mg/kg to rats via the femoral vein and proved

that the acute renal vasodilatory effect of RSV was mediated

by increased NO production/bioavailability and its superoxide-

scavenging effect. We did not measure oxidative stress markers

such as malondialdehyde (MDA), however we possibly achieved

sufficient antioxidant effect by the RSV aplications.

In addition, it was shown that abnormalities in vascular

NO production and transport resulted in hypertension due

to endothelial dysfunction. RSV increased NO synthesis and

functioned as a potent

in vivo

anti-oxidant.

26

Interestingly, in the RSV50 group, the water balance was

significantly higher compared to the control group despite no

significant changes in water intake and urine output. Application

of L-NNA plus RSV decreased the water balance compared to

the application of RSV only, however it was not significantly

different compared to the control group. Decreased urine volume

may have been related to diminished water intake, as found in

previous studies.

27-29

C

Na

and GFR values were lower in the RSV-E group and these

findings were attributed to the RSV eluent (20% ethanol), which

Table 6. Sodium clearance rate (C

Na

), glomerular filtration rate

(GFR) and fractional sodium excretion (%FE

Na

) values

Groups (

n

=

7)

C

Na

(ml/min) GFR (ml/min)

%FE

Na

Control

0.0047

±

0.0007

γ

1.25

±

0.19

γ

0.38

±

0.04

L-NNA

0.0049

±

0.0005

γ

1.30

±

0.16

γβ

0.42

±

0.07

RSV50

0.0042

±

0.0007

γ

0.87

±

0.08

γ

0.53

±

0.11

RSV-E

0.0015

±

0.0007 0.32

±

0.09*

β

0.41

±

0.09

L-NNA

+

RSV50 0.0055

±

0.001

γ

1.33

±

0.14

γβ

0.42

±

0.08

*Compared to the control group,

p

<

0.05;

α

compared to the L-NNA

group,

p

<

0.05;

β

compared to the RSV50 group,

p

<

0.05;

γ

compared

to the RSV-E group,

p

<

0.05.

Control

L-NNA RSV50 RSV-E L-NNA +

RSV50

0.0070

0.0060

0.0050

0.0040

0.0030

0.0020

0.0010

0.0000

Sodium clearnace rate (ml/min)

α

α

Compared to other groups,

p

<

0.05

Fig. 3.

Sodium clearance values of the study groups.

Control

L-NNA RSV50 RSV-E L-NNA +

RSV50

1.60

1.40

1.20

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00

Glomerular filtration rate (ml/min)

βγ

βγ

β

γ

γ

β

Compared to RSV50 group,

p

<

0.05

γ

Compared to RSV-E group,

p

<

0.05

Fig. 4.

Glomerular filtration rates of the study groups.

Control

L-NNA RSV50 RSV-E L-NNA +

RSV50

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

Fractional sodium excretion (%)

Fig. 5.

Fractional sodium excretion values of the study groups.