Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  52 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 52 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 5, September/October 2017

326

AFRICA

Results

Among the 1 000 individuals included in the Dakar sample, 16

women were excluded because they reported pregnancy. Similarly,

four women of the Tessekere sample were also excluded for

pregnancy. Analyses were finally performed on a sample of

984 Dakarites and 496 Tessekere dwellers. The distributions of

height, weight, BMI, WC, WHR, general and central obesity,

sociodemographic variables, and comparisons between males and

females in both environments are summarised in Table 1. The

results show that men and women differed for all the factors studied

except for age in both environments, and for WHR in Dakar.

In Dakar, the prevalence of underweight, overweight and

general obesity in terms of BMI was 12.6% (95% CI: 10.5–14.7),

19.2% (95% CI: 16.7–21.7) and 9.7% (95% CI: 7.9–11.5),

respectively. The prevalence of central obesity was 26.0% (95%

CI: 23.3–28.7) using WC, and 39.9% (95% CI: 36.8–43.0) using

WHR (Table 2).

In Tessekere, the prevalence of underweight, overweight and

general obesity in terms of BMI was 29.6% (95% CI: 25.6–

33.6), 13.3% (95% CI: 10.3–16.3) and 2.8% (95% CI: 1.3–4.3),

respectively. The prevalence of central obesity was 11.9% (95%

CI: 9.1–14.7) using WC, and 23.6% (95% CI: 19.9–27.3) using

WHR (Table 2).

Dakar residents were more often overweight and obese and

less often thin than the Tessekere inhabitants [

χ

² (3 df)

=

80.9;

p

<

0.001]. Likewise, they showed higher central obesity rates than

the Tessekere inhabitants [WC:

χ

² (1 df)

=

39.3,

p

<

0.001; WHR:

χ

² (1 df)

=

39,

p

<

0.001].

In Dakar as in Tessekere, bivariate analyses showed that

all the sociodemographic factors studied were associated with

general and central obesity (Table 3). The prevalence of general

and central obesity rose gradually with age in both environments,

except for obesity based on WC in Tessekere, which reached its

highest rate among people between the ages of 40 and 49 years.

In the urban and rural areas studied, general obesity affected

women six times more often than men, and their WC exceeded

the threshold of obesity 11 times and 18 more often than men in

Dakar and Tessekere, respectively.

As shown in Fig. 1, the prevalence of overweight/obesity

(using BMI) rose with age among men and women in Dakar. The

same pattern was observed among men in Tessekere. However,

among rural women, the prevalence of overweight/obesity

reached its highest rate between the ages of 30 and 39 years.

Multivariate analyses showed that age and gender were

the primary risk factors for overweight/obesity in Dakar and

Tessekere (Table 4). Educational level also showed significant

associations with BMI

25 kg/m², but only in the urban area,

where people with between one and eight years of schooling

had greater chances of being overweight or obese than people

Table 1. Demographic and anthropomatic characteristics of the sample

Characteristics

Dakar

Tessekere

Total

(

n

=

984)

Male

(

n

=

494)

Female

(

n

=

490)

p

-value

Total

(

n

=

496)

Male

(

n

=

241)

Female

(

n

=

255)

p

-value

Age (years)

35.70 ± 13.16 35.89 ± 13.27 35.51 ± 13.07 0.652 37.33 ± 15.25 37.26 ± 15.45 37.40 ± 15.08 0.917

Height (cm)

172.56 ± 9.87 178.96 ± 8.07 166.11 ± 6.88

<

0.001 169.63 ± 10.38 175.85 ± 8.09 163.75 ± 8.77

<

0.001

Weight (kg)

69.28 ± 14.44 70.21 ± 16.67 68.34 ± 16.00 0.043 60.25 ± 12.32 62.38 ± 11.26 58.23 ± 12.96

<

0.001

BMI (kg/m²)

23.33 ± 4.89 21.91 ± 3.54 24.76 ± 5.59

<

0.001 20.97 ± 4.07 20.15 ± 3.24 21.74 ± 4.60

<

0.001

General obesity,

n

(%)

95 (9.7)

14 (2.8)

81 (16.5)

<

0.001

14 (2.8)

2 (0.8)

12 (4.7)

0.009

WC (cm)

84.31 ± 13.02 81.51 ± 10.65 87.14 ± 14.51

<

0.001 77.25 ± 10.59 76.13 ± 9.31 78.32 ± 11.59 0.021

Central obesity by WC,

n

(%)

256 (26)

21 (4.3)

235 (48)

<

0.001

59 (11.9)

3 (1.2)

56 (22.?)

<

0.001

WHR

0.836 ± 0.081 0.837 ± 0.069 0.834 ± 0.092 0.579 0.839 ± 0.079 0.847 ± 0.075 0.831 ± 0.082 0.019

Central obesity by WHR,

n

(%)

393 (39.9)

83 (16.8)

310 (63.3)

<

0.001

117 (23.6)

17 (7.1)

100 (39.2)

<

0.001

Educational level (Dakar/Tessekere),

n

(%)

<

0.001

0.006

None/none

208 (21.1)

84 (27)

124 (25.3)

373 (75.2)

168 (69.7)

205 (80.4)

Primary/1 year or +

348 (35.5)

163 (33)

185 (37.8)

123 (24.8)

73 (30.3)

50 (19.6)

Intermediate

197 (20)

109 (22.1)

88 (18)

Secondary

91 (9.2)

51 (10.3)

40 (8.2)

University

140 (14.2)

87 (17.6)

53 (10.8)

BMI: body mass index, WC: waist circumference, WHR: waist–hip ratio.

Table 2. Prevalence (%) of underweight, overweight, general obesity

and central obesity by place of residence

Criterion

Category

Dakar

Tessekere

BMI

Underweight

12.6 (10.5–14.7)

29.6 (25.6–33.6)

Overweight

19.2 (16.7–21.7)

13.3 (10.3–16.3)

General obesity

9.7 (7.9–11.5)

2.8 (1.3–4.3)

WC

Central obesity

26.0 (23.3–28.7)

11.9 (9.1–14.7)

WHR

Central obesity

39.9 (36.8–43.0)

23.6 (19.9–27.3)

BMI: body mass index, WC: waist circumference, WHR: waist-hip ratio.

In brackets: 95% confidence limits.

20–29

30–39

40–49

50 and over

% of overweight/obesity

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Women in Dakar

Men in Dakar

Women in Tessekere

Men in Tessekere

22.3

10.6

16.1

21.4

48.2

53.9

67.5

30.7

4.0

7.3

14.3

19.6

28.3

20.5

30.0

15.0

Fig. 1.

Age- and gender-specific prevalence (%) of over-

weight/obesity in Dakar and Tessekere.