Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  35 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 6, November/December 2017

AFRICA

373

patient with PH, we describe the clinical context of presentation

and confirmation of PH. The control subjects were younger with

a mean age of 36

±

10 years and 48 (16%) were men.

Table 1 summarises the demographic, clinical and echo-

cardiographic profile comparing men and women in the patient

group. Significant gender differences were seen, with a higher

prevalence of male smokers (47.6 vs 6.8%;

p

<

0.001) and better

performance in the males during the six-minute walking test (352

±

97 vs 254

±

142 m,

p

=

0.017).

Based on the WHO classification of PH, group 2 (venous PH)

was the most prevalent (46%), followed by group 1 (PAH) (31%),

group 3 (hypoxic PH) (22%) and group 5 (miscellaneous PH)

(3%). In all, 55.4% of patients presented in the WHO functional

class III or IV and the mean Karnofsky performance score was

67

±

17%.

Compared to the control group, nearly all abnormalities were

much more frequent in our PH cohort. As shown in Fig. 4A,

the most prevalent (case vs control) major abnormalities were:

pathological Q wave (47.7 vs 6.7%), followed by left ventricular

hypertrophy (LVH) (38.5 vs 9.8%) and p-pulmonale (36.9 vs

20.7%). None of the patients had a completely normal ECG, as

opposed to 15% in the control group.

Of the minor ECG abnormalities (Fig. 4B), tachycardia (40

vs 12.6%) and QRS axis

100° (38.5 vs 5.3%) were the most

prevalent. In all, 58.5% of the PH group vs 76.5% of the controls

were in sinus rhythm. Bradycardia (1.5 vs 4.9%) and right bundle

branch block (RBBB) with QRS right-axis deviation (1.5 vs

1.1%) were the least prevalent. Overall, in the PH group, 32.3%

had at least three or four major abnormalities and 24.6% had

three or four minor abnormalities. The respective numbers in the

control group were 4.2 and 0%.

Table 1. Demographic, clinical and echocardiographic profile of

patients with PH in the PAPUCO registry

Profile

All

(

n

=

65)

mean

±

2SD,

n

(%)

Male

(

n

=

21)

mean

±

2SD,

n

(%)

Female

(

n

=

44)

mean

±

2SD,

n

(%)

p

-value

Sociodemographic profile

Mean age (years)

43

±

15

47

±

14

41

±

15

0.133

Smoking

<

0.001

Never smoked

44 (67.7)

9 (42.9)

35 (79.5)

Ex-smoker

8 (12.3)

8 (38.1)

0 (0)

Current smoker

5 (7.7)

2 (9.5)

3 (6.8)

Previous or current

pulmonary tuberculosis

21 (32.3)

7 (33.3)

13 (29.5)

0.536

Clinical presentation

Dizziness

22 (33.8)

4 (19)

18 (40.9)

0.120

Shortness of breath

56 (86.2)

19 (90.5)

37 (84.1)

0.473

Body mass index (kg/m

2

)

23.7

±

5.8 24.1

±

6.5 23.5

±

5.5 0.690

Heart rate (bpm)

93

±

19 91.6

±

10.2 94.7

±

5.8 0.195

Pulse oximetry at rest (%) 93.8

±

7.5 94.7

±

5.8 91.6

±

10.2 0.156

Abnormal respiration at

rest,

n

(%)

15 (23.1)

5 (23.8)

10 (22.7)

0.861

Systolic BP (mmHg)

117

±

22 123

±

27 114

±

14

0.186

Diastolic BP (mmHg)

78

±

16

82

±

19

77

±

14

0.238

WHO functional class

III or IV

36 (55.4)

13 (61.9)

23 (52.3)

0.323

Karnofsky performance

score (%)

67

±

17

69

±

15

67

±

18

0.717

Distance walked in 6-min

walking test (m)

280

±

138 352

±

97 254

±

142 0.017

Jugular venous distension

56 (86.2)

19 (90.5)

37 (84.1)

0.591

Peripheral oedema

40 (61.5)

13 (61.9)

27 (61.4)

0.594

Main echocardiography characteristics

Right ventricular systolic

pressure (mmHg)

61.4

±

19.8 60.5

±

24.6 61.8

±

17.2 0.797

Tricuspid annular plane

systolic excursion (mm)

14.9

±

5

14.7

±

5.8

15

±

4.5 0.844

Left ventricular ejection

fraction (%)

51.6

±

20

48

±

17.5 53.2

±

21

0.357

Mean left ventricular

end-diastolic diameter

(mm)

49.6

±

12.3 52.4

±

9.9 48.1

±

13.2 0.210

Right ventricular

enlargement

56 (86.2)

18 (85.7)

38 (86.4)

0.335

Right atrial enlargement

57 (87.7)

19 (90.5)

38 (86.7)

0.830

Data are % or mean

±

SD;

p

-values based on the

t

-test, chi-squared or Fisher’s

exact test as appropriate; statistical significance is based on

p

<

0.05. BP, blood

pressure; WHO, World Health Organisation.

Major

T-wave

abnormal-

ity

Arrhyth-

mia***

LVH*** Patho-

logical Q

wave***

Prolonged

QTc inter-

val***

LBBB

or other

conduction

delay***

p-pulmo-

nale**

Proportion of patients with major abnormalities (%)

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

PH group

control group

Tachycardia

***

Bradycardia QRS right-

axis devia-

tion***

RBBB and

QRS right-

axis deviation

Right ventric-

ular hyper-

trophy***

Proportion of patients with minor abnormalities (%)

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

PH group

control group

Fig. 4.

Prevalence of major (A) and minor (B) ECG abnor-

malities in 65 patients with pulmonary hypertension in

the PAPUCO registry compared to 285 controls with

normal Doppler echocardiography and right ventricu-

lar systolic pressure. RBBB; right bundle branch block,

QRS right-axis deviation

=

QRS axis

>

100°. *

p

<

0.05,

**

p

<

0.01, ***

p

<

0.001.

A

B