Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  34 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 6, November/December 2017

372

AFRICA

Major abnormalities included:

arrhythmias (supraventricular as premature supraventricular

tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, multifocal atrial

tachycardia, paroxysmal atrial tachycardia or ventricular-like

premature ventricular complex, ventricular fibrillation, accel-

erated idioventricular rhythm, Torsades de pointes)

major T-wave abnormalities (T-wave inversion)

left ventricular hypertrophy defined by the Cornell voltage

criteria [(S in V3

+

R in aVL

>

24 mm (men) or

>

20 mm

(women)]

pathological Q waves

prolonged QTc (

>

470 ms as calculated by Bazett’s formula)

left bundle branch block or other conduction delay

p-pulmonale defined as a P wave in lead II

>

2 mm or

>

1.5 mm in lead V1/V2.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical

Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0, Chicago, Illinois.

Prevalence, sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and positive (PPV)

or negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated by the

following formulae:

16,17

Prevalence of an ECG abnormality

=

total with the

abnormality of interest/total number of patients in the group

of interest.

Considering echocardiography as our reference diagnostic

test in this study (PH present or not), we assessed the diagnostic

capability of ECG (ECG criteria positive or negative) in a 2

×

2

contingency table, and calculations were done using the above

equation, in which true (false) positive represented our patients

(PH group) with (without) ECG abnormalities, while true (false)

negative represented controls without (with) ECG abnormalities.

Se

=

[true positive/(true positive

+

false negative)]

×

100

Sp

=

[true negative/(true negative

+

false positive)]

×

100

PPV

=

[sensitivity

×

prevalence]

÷

[sensitivity

×

prevalence +

(1 – specificity)

×

(1 – prevalence)]

NPV

=

[specificity

×

(1 – prevalence)]

÷

[specificity

×

(1 –

prevalence) + (1 – sensitivity)

×

prevalence]

Prevalence, Se, Sp, PPV and NPV are presented as percentages,

while continuous variables are presented as means and standard

deviation (SD), or median (25th to 75th percentiles). We used

χ

²

to compare proportions of categorical variables and the Student’s

t

-test to compare mean differences for continuous variables. A

p

-value

<

0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Fig. 2 shows how we obtained our cohort of 65 adult patients

with ECGs indicating PH from the overall 254 PAPUCO patients.

The patients were young (mean age 47

±

14 years), 21 (32%) were

men, and all except four were of black African origin. These

four patients were coloured or of mixed race. In Fig. 3, showing

a sample ECG, chest X-ray and echocardiographic images of a

45 patients did not fulfill inclusion

criteria:

• Newly diagnosed PH –

based on clinical and

echocardiographic criteria

• Able or likely to return for a

6-month follow up

• At least 18 years old

• Consented in writing to

participate in the registry

144 patients excluded because of:

• Missing ECG (118)

• Poor-quality ECG (17)

• Missing echocardiographic

diagnosis (9)

Patients admitted with PH

n

=

254

Patients enrolled in the study

n

=

209

ECGs analysed

n

=

65

Fig. 2.

Flow chart of inclusion for the study.

Fig. 3.

ECG of a 38-year-old HIV-positive woman from the

PAPUCO cohort. The patient had been on high-

ly active antiretroviral therapy for three years and

presented with palpitations and WHO functional class

stage III shortness of breath. The chest X-ray (A)

shows mild right heart enlargement and borderline

raised cardiothoracic ratio. Doppler echocardiographic

images (B, C) confirm the diagnosis of severe PH with

both severely enlarged right atrium and ventricle with

estimated RVSP of 63 mmHg. The ECG (D) shows

a normal heart rate and sinus rhythm, right heart

enlargement indicated by right-axis deviation of the

QRS complex and by a R/S ratio in lead V1 of

>

1

with poor R-wave progression. Right ventricular func-

tion was altered with a tricuspid annular plane systolic

excursion (TAPSE) of 9 mm. Left ventricular ejection

fraction was preserved, there was no valvular heart

disease and the pericardium was normal.

A

D

B

C