Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 3, May/June 2019

148

AFRICA

Supporting previous literature,

28

this study indicates that blood

pressure may not be a determinant of childhood underweight.

The study furthermore shows that hypertension prevalence

was higher among underweight children than in those not

underweight and it confirms a previous study.

29

Factors predicting childhood underweight

Nutritional status: our study detected that nutrition was the first

predictor in the decision tree, indicating that it was the most

important risk factor for childhood underweight. Of the total

sample, moderate and severe undernutrition appeared to be the

most important, followed by mild undernutrition (92%) and

normal nutrition (54.8%). The high prevalence of undernutrition

among childhood underweight found by Black

et al

. corresponds

with the findings of our study.

30

Age: consistent with previous studies,

14,31

our analysis has

shown that age group was another important risk factor

for childhood underweight. The study detected that mild

undernutrition in children aged between five and 10 years was a

predictor of childhood underweight, which is in agreement with

a previous study conducted in a rural South African population.

31

The reason for this being a predictor may be that the abdominal

muscles weaken as an individual gets older, decreasing BMI.

Gender and educational level: replicating consistent research

results from rural black South African populations,

9,10,32

this study

Node 0

Category %

n

No

19.5 354

Yes

80.5 1457

Total

100.0 1811

Node 11

Category %

n

No

12.3 18

Yes

87.7 128

Total

8.1 146

Node 12

Category %

n

No

35.2 43

Yes

64.8 79

Total

6.7 122

Node 8

Category %

n

No

1.5

1

Yes

98.5 64

Total

3.6 65

Node 7

Category %

n

No

71.3 241

Yes

28.7 97

Total

18.7 338

Node 4

Category %

n

No

0.0

0

Yes

100.0 265

Total

14.6 265

Node 2

Category %

n

No

0.0

0

Yes

100.0 265

Total

14.6 265

Underweight

Node 6

Category %

n

No

22.8 61

Yes

77.2 207

Total

14.8 268

Node 3

Category %

n

No

45.2 303

Yes

54.8 368

Total

37.1 671

Node 1

Category %

n

No

7.9 50

Yes

92.

581

Total

34.8 631

Node 5

Category %

n

No

13.7 50

Yes

86.3 316

Total

20.2 366

No

Yes

Gender

Adj.

p

-value = 0.000;

Chi-square = 21.451; df = 1

Age group

Adj.

p

-value = 0.000;

Chi-square = 39.318; df = 1

Age group

Adj.

p

-value = 0.000;

Chi-square = 197.505; df = 2

School level

Adj.

p

-value = 0.000;

Chi-square = 19.855; df = 1

Node 9

Category %

n

No

23.8 35

Yes

76.2 112

Total

8.1 147

Node 10

Category %

n

No

6.8 15

Yes

93.2 204

Total

12.1 219

Male

Female

Primary

Preschool

11–13 years; 14–16 years

8–10 years; 5–7 years

11–13 years; 14–16 years

5–7 years

8–10 years

Severe undernutrition;

moderate undernutrition

Normal

Mild undernutrition

Nutrition

Adj.

p

-value = 0.000;

Chi-square = 455.231; df = 2

Fig. 1.

The CHAID decision tree analysis to identify the factors of childhood underweight in Ellisras.