Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  25 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 30, No 3, May/June 2019

AFRICA

153

Prior to PDA closure, the PAP was significantly higher in

group B than in group A (

p

<

0.05). The mean PAP in group B

was 47.6

±

8.1, and in group A it was 40.3

±

6.2 (Table 2). It was

higher in both groups than in the control group (23.2

±

5.1) (

p

<

0.05) (Tables 3, 4).

After PDA assessment, the PAP was enhanced significantly

in both groups (

p

<

0.05) and approached non-significance

compared with the control group at the six-month follow-up

assessment. The mean PAP in group A after the intervention was

23.9

±

4.9, and in group B it was 21.9

±

4.7 (Tables 3, 4).

The ASI was positively correlated with the left ventricular

end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (

r

=

0.58,

p

<

0.05) (Fig. 1),

BNP level (

r

=

0.303,

p

<

0.05) (Fig. 2) and PAP (

r

=

0.68,

p

<

0.05). It was negatively correlated with LVEF (

r

=

0.66,

p

<

0.05)

(Fig. 3).

Discussion

PDA causes volume overload of the left side of the heart, which

can lead to pulmonary hypertension. The planning of treatment

for congenital heart deformities depends on the haemodynamic

and anatomical circumstances when considering myocardial cell

adjustment and chamber remodelling.

1

It is critical to have various techniques for observing patients

with PDA.

1

In our study we attempted to assess the impact

of postponement of PDA closure on aortic stiffness and its

connection with heart function prior to and after transcatheter

closure of PDA as a tool for observing patients with PDA.

Our study demonstrated that patients in group A had a

significantly higher ASI than those in the control group before

closure (

p

<

0.05). After closure, the ASI diminished significantly,

however it was significantly higher in group A than in the control

group at the six-month follow-up assessment (

p

<

0.05) (Table 3).

Patients with PDA in subgroup B had a significantly higher ASI

than the control group before closure (

p

<

0.05). After closure,

ASI

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

BNP

100

80

60

40

r

= 0.423

p

= 0.001**

Fig. 1.

A significant positive correlation is shown between the

ASI and BNP.

Table 3. Comparison between group A and the control group with regard

to ASI, BNP, PAP and cardiac function before and after PDA closure

Variables

Patients with PDA

(

n

=

30)

Control

group

(

n

=

30)

p

-value

p

-value

p

-value

Before

closure

After

closure

ASI, mean

±

SD

6.7

±

2.8

3.8

±

1.4 1.6

±

0.74

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

LVEF (%)

mean

±

SD

59.4

±

5.3

66

±

4.2 66.7

±

3.4

<

0.05

<

0.05 0.6

LVEDD (mm)

mean

±

SD

3.4

±

0.85 3

±

0.82 2.8

±

0.55

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

LVESD (mm)

mean

±

SD

2.2

±

0.37 2.0

±

0.32 1.9

±

0.54

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

E/Ea, mean

±

SD

11.2

±

1.9

6.9

±

0.88 6.5

±

1.06

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

BNP, mean

±

SD

59.6

±

16.1 19.9

±

5.5 19.8

±

5.1

<

0.05

<

0.05 0.9

PAP, mean

±

SD

43.5

±

7.3 23

±

4.7 23.2

±

5.1

<

0.05

<

0.05 0.8

p

: significance between patients before and after closure;

p

: significance between

patients before closure and controls;

p

: significance between patients after closure

and controls; ASI: arterial stiffness index; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction;

LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD: left ventricular end-

systolic diameter; E/Ea: ratio of early mitral flow velocity to early mitral annular

velocity; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; PAP: pulmonary artery pressure.

Table 4. Comparison between group B and the control group with regard

to ASI, BNP, PAP and cardiac function before and after PDA closure

Variables

Patients with PDA

(

n

=

30)

Control

group

(

n

=

30)

p

-value

p

-value

p

-value

Before

closure

After

closure

ASI, mean

±

SD

9.4

±

2.7 6.3

±

2.4 1.6

±

0.77

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

LVEF (%)

mean

±

SD

52.6

±

2.2 58

±

2.5 66.9

±

3.3

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

LVEDD (mm)

mean

±

SD

4.1

±

0.98 3.7

±

0.93 1.8

±

0.59

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

LVESD (mm)

mean

±

SD

3.4

±

0.85 3

±

0.82 2.8

±

0.55

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

E/Ea, mean

±

SD

10.9

±

1.5 7.0

±

0.85 6.2

±

1.1

<

0.05

<

0.05

<

0.05

BNP, mean

±

SD

70

±

14.7 20.2

±

6.3 19.4

±

4.0

<

0.05

<

0.05 0.5

PAP, mean

±

SD

47.6

±

8.1 21.9

±

4.7 23.4

±

5.0

<

0.05

<

0.05 0.2

p

: significance between patients before and after closure;

p

: significance between

patients before closure and controls;

p

: significance between patients after closure

and controls; ASI: arterial stiffness index; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction;

LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD: left ventricular end-

systolic diameter; E/Ea: ratio of early mitral flow velocity to early mitral annular

velocity; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; PAP: pulmonary artery pressure.

ASI

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

PAP

70

60

50

40

30

r

= 0.764

p

= 0.001**

Fig. 2.

A significant positive correlation is shown between the

ASI and PAP.