Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 61 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 61 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 32, No 4, July/August 2021

AFRICA

179

of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association, and (3) those

accompanied by paroxysmal, persistent or permanent AF based

on the relevant standards in the

Guideline for the Management

of Atrial Fibrillation

(2014). All patients gave informed consent

to this study, and the study was approved by the hospital ethics

committee.

Exclusion criteria were: (1) patients with cardiac dysfunction

caused by congenital heart disease, pulmonary heart disease,

primary valvular heart disease, or acute myocardial infarction,

(2) those with malignant tumours, (3) those with severe hepatic

or renal dysfunction, (4) those who failed to complete the study

as required due to mental disorders, or (5) those whose condition

of disease became stable for less than one week after the acute

phase of CHF.

The basic clinical parameters such as gender, age, smoking

history, body mass index, blood pressure, diabetes history

and hypertension history were collected. In addition, 5 ml

of fasting venous blood was drawn from each patient in the

morning, the day after percutaneous coronary intervention. It

was anticoagulated with EDTA and centrifuged at 3 000 rpm

and 4°C for 15 minutes.

The serum was examined using a fully automatic biochemical

analyser (Hitachi Labospect 008) to determine creatinine (Cr),

total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-

C), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

(HDL-C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and blood urea

nitrogen (BUN) levels. Neutrophils and lymphocytes were

counted using a haematology analyser (Sysmex XE2100). Within

24 hours of admission, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)

was determined using a DW-F3 Doppler ultrasonic diagnostic

system (DAWEI).

All patients enrolled were followed up for five years through

the out-patient clinic, by re-examination, re-hospitalisation

and telephone. The occurrence of MACE was taken as the

end point of follow up. MACE include acute myocardial

infarction, congestive HF, ischaemic stroke, peripheral arterial

occlusion, recurrent angina, severe arrhythmia (persistent

ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, new-onset

haemodynamically unstable AF or atrial flutter, high-grade

atrioventricular block, excluding reperfusion arrhythmia during

PCI), and cardiac death.

6

Statistical analysis

SPSS20.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA, 2011) was

used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data in line with normal

distribution are expressed as means ± standard deviation, and

one-way analysis of variance was performed for comparison

between groups. Numerical data are expressed as percentages, and

the chi-squared test was performed for intergroup comparison.

Factors related to MACE were analysed through multivariate

logistic regression models.

The diagnostic value of NLR for MACE was analysed using

the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Survival

curves were plotted using GraphPad 5 software, survival

analysis was conducted using the Kaplan–Meier method, and

the difference in survival curves was detected using the log-rank

test. A

p

-value

< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The corrected test level

α

= 0.0206 was used in the pairwise

comparison among groups.

Results

All 248 patients were divided into MACE and non-MACE

groups according to whether MACE occurred during the follow-

up period. Compared with the non-MACE group, the MACE

group had a higher age, higher proportion of cases with a

history of smoking and diabetes, LDL-C and FPG level, NLR

and NYHA functional class (III + IV), and lower LVEF. The

differences were statistically significant (

p

< 0.05) (Table 1).

With the presence or absence of MACE during the follow-up

period as the dependent variable, and the statistically significant

factors in univariate analysis as the independent variables,

multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The

results showed that higher age, LDL-C level and NLR, and

lower LVEF and diabetes, and NYHA class III and IV were

independent predictive factors for MACE (

p

< 0.05) (Table 2).

Based on the quartile of NLR, the patients were divided into

group A (NLR < 1.98), group B (1.98 ≤ NLR < 2.85), group C

(2.85 ≤ NLR < 4.62) and group D (NLR ≥ 4.62). The incidence

of MACE during follow up in each group is shown in Table 3. It

was found that the incidence of MACE rose with increased NLR

and the differences were statistically significant between groups

(

p

< 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the

incidence of acute myocardial infarction, severe arrhythmia

and cardiac death among the four groups (

p

< 0.05), but the

incidence of other MACE showed no statistically significant

differences (

p

> 0.05).

According to the Kaplan–Meier curves of patients with CHF

and AF, the average duration of MACE was 49.31 months in

group A, 45.27 months in group B, 43.63 months in group C and

40.34 months in group D. It was confirmed using the log-rank

test that the survival curves of patients with MACE showed

statistically significant differences among the four groups (

p

<

0.05; group A vs group B;

p

= 0.006, group A vs group C;

p

=

Table 1. Baseline clinical data of MACE and non-MACE groups

[mean ± standard deviation/number (%)]

Index

Non-MACE

group (

n

= 152)

MACE

group (

n

= 96) t/

χ

2

p

-value

Age (year)

53.97 ± 10.19 67.24 ± 10.12 10.016 < 0.001

Male

92 (60.53)

64 (66.67)

0.951 0.33

BMI (kg/m

2

)

24.42 ± 2.11 24.67 ± 2.01 0.926 0.356

Smoking history

70 (46.05)

62 (64.58)

8.116 0.004

Systolic pressure (mmHg) 134.37 ± 12.89 135.18 ± 13.33 0.476 0.635

Diastolic pressure (mmHg) 84.25 ± 7.63 85.34 ± 8.17 1.066 0.287

Diabetes mellitus

60 (39.47)

55 (57.29)

7.512 0.006

Hypertension

87 (57.24)

58 (60.42)

0.245 0.621

LVEF (%)

58.07 ± 6.18 39.42 ± 3.98 26.312 < 0.001

Cr (μmol/l)

75.91 ± 22.54 74.45 ± 20.32 0.516 0.606

TC (mmol/l)

4.21 ± 0.51

4.22 ± 0.49 0.153 0.879

TG (mmol/l)

1.50 ± 0.06

1.51 ± 0.10 0.984 0.326

LDL-C (mmol/l)

2.84 ± 0.12

2.96 ± 0.15 6.953 < 0.001

HDL-C (mmol/l)

1.27 ± 0.19

1.26 ± 0.15 0.437 0.663

FPG (mmol/l)

6.93 ± 0.65

7.63 ± 0.96 6.846 < 0.001

BUN (mmol/l)

5.44 ± 1.39

5.46 ± 1.33 0.112 0.911

NLR

2.38 ± 0.21

4.32 ± 0.38 32.38 < 0.001

NYHA functional class

47.616 < 0.001

I + II

100 (65.79)

20 (20.83)

III + IV

52 (34.21)

76 (79.17)

BMI: body mass index; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; Cr: creatinine; FPG: fasting

plasma glucose; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-

density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MACE:

major adverse cardiovascular event; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio;

NYHA: New York Heart Association; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides.