Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  32 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 1, January/February 2015

30

AFRICA

this community noted that having social support was associated

with treatment compliance. In the present study, we proceeded

to explore the issue of social support further by (1) exploring the

relationship between social support and good compliance with

treatment for hypertension, and (2) identifying factors associated

with receiving social support from family and/or friends.

Methods

This descriptive study was conducted in Idikan community,

Ibadan, a city in the south-western part of Nigeria, as part of

a larger community-based study of the sociological aspects of

hypertension. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from

the joint University of Ibadan–University College Hospital

ethical committee.

Idikan is located in the indigenous part of the city of Ibadan

and has a population of 15 042.

14

The health facilities in the

community include an outreach clinic run by the Department

of Preventive Medicine and Primary Care of the University of

Ibadan, four private clinics and a small dental clinic run by the

Dental Centre of University College Hospital (UCH). There are

over 150 registered patent medicine stores in the area. There are

three traditional healing homes, and they are all accessible to

members of the community.

The study was a descriptive, community-based, quantitative

study of hypertensive subjects aged 25 years and above

who were residents of Idikan community. Previous studies

in the community

15,16

had conducted household screening for

hypertension, which facilitated the identification of hypertensive

subjects in the community. The subjects for this study were

selected from a list of known hypertensive subjects residing

in the community that was developed from one such previous

hypertension study and updated for the present study during

home visits.

Four hundred and forty hypertensive subjects were enrolled

using a consecutive sampling method. After obtaining

informed consent, subjects were administered a semi-structured

questionnaire that had items on several issues, including

healthcare seeking for hypertension, their beliefs about

hypertension, compliance with treatment, and availability of

social support (from family and friends).

Social support for compliance was assessed in the structured

questionnaire using the questions: (1) Do you normally seek

financial support from family members for your hypertension?

(2) How concerned are your family members about your

hypertension? (3) How interested are your friends in talking

with you about your hypertension? (4) How helpful are your

family in reminding you to take your hypertension medication?

(5) How helpful are your friends in reminding you to take your

hypertension medication? Social support from family members

or friends was defined as reporting support from family as

‘helpful’ or ‘very helpful’ in being concerned about respondents’

hypertension (non-directive support), and reminding of

medication (directive support).

As previously described

13

compliance was defined using

the question on how frequently people missed taking their

medication. The use of compliance as a variable was defined by

first scaling compliance as ‘good’ or ‘high compliance’ (where

the respondent ‘never misses’ or ‘rarely misses’ taking his/her

medication doses), ‘medium compliance’ (where the respondent

‘sometimes misses’ taking medication) and ‘poor’ or ‘low

compliance’ (where the respondent ‘regularly misses’ or ‘fairly

regularly misses’ taking the medication. Since the desired goal

of treatment for hypertension is that the patient complies with

taking medication in order to control the high blood pressure,

we focused on ‘good compliance’ (where the respondent ‘never

misses’ or ‘rarely misses’ taking his/her medication doses) as the

main outcome variable to evaluate compliance in this study.

Statistical analysis

Management and analysis of the survey questionnaire data

was done using SPSS version 11 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA).

Frequencies of the responses to the questions were computed

and presented as percentages. Association between categorical

variables was tested using the Chi-square test.

Results

The 440 respondents comprised 65.2% women and 34.8% men.

About half (51.1%) of the respondents had no formal education

and half were traders. The ages of respondents ranged from

25 to 90 years, with a mean age of 60 (SD 12) years. Most

(71%) of the respondents were married (Table 1). Most (70.0%)

of the respondents knew about their hypertensive condition

only when they were invited to participate in a research study,

during which their blood pressure was measured, while 23.0%

of the respondents found out that they were hypertensive when

they were ill with some other ailment and went to hospital for

treatment. The most common perceived causes of hypertension

were anxiety (35.7%) and stress (25.2%), followed by mental

illness (7.5%) and ‘unhappiness’ (5.5%).

The majority (77.5%) of the respondents claimed they

complied with keeping their follow-up clinic appointments

every time, and 46% said they were on medication at the time

of the study. Roughly one-half (50.7%) of respondents had

good compliance with treatment as they claimed to be taking

their medication regularly, whereas 41.5% had poor compliance

at different levels, ranging from regularly missing taking their

medication to rarely taking their medication.

Social support and treatment compliance

Having a family member with hypertension was significantly

associated (

p

=

0.038) with compliance in general with 49.3% of

those who said ‘yes’ versus 61.7% of those who answered ‘no’.

Overall, 85 (19.3%) of the respondents reported that family

members were very concerned about their hypertension while

329 (74.8%) said family members were extremely concerned

about their hypertension. Also, 89 (20.2%) and 322 (73.2%),

respectively, reported that family members were very helpful

or extremely helpful in reminding them about taking their

medication.

Regarding support from friends, 116 (26.4%) of respondents

reported that friends were very concerned about their

hypertension while 127 (28.9%) said family members were

extremely concerned about their hypertension. Ninety-one

(20.7%) and 150 (34.1%) respectively reported that family

members were very helpful or extremely helpful in reminding

them about taking their medication.

Both having a family member with hypertension and having