Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  36 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 1, January/February 2015

34

AFRICA

Comparison between superficial femoral artery stenting

and bypass surgery in severe lower-limb ischaemia:

a retrospective study

J Islam, JV Robbs

Abstract

Background:

Symptomatic femoro-popliteal disease is treated

by bypass surgery or angioplasty with or without stenting.

The aim of this study was to compare the results of stenting

and bypass surgery with regard to limb salvage in patients

with severe leg ischaemia.

Methods:

A total of 213 patients with femoro-popliteal

disease presenting with severe claudication or critical limb

ischaemia between January 2009 and December 2013 were

evaluated; 118 patients (139 limbs) had stents placed and 95

patients (104 limbs) had bypass surgery. Most (60%) present-

ed with critical limb ischaemia (rest pain 40%, tissue necrosis

20%), and the remainder with severe claudication. The treat-

ment groups had matching risk factors.

Results:

The average age was 66 years and 73% were male.

Tissue necrosis was found in 26% of the stent group and 12%

of the bypass group (

p

=

0.009). In the stent group 26% had

adjunctive procedures, compared to 16% in the bypass group

(

p

=

0.138). During the one-year follow up, there were 30 stent

occlusions (22%) and 18 graft occlusions (17%) (

p

=

0.42).

There were 14 major amputations (10%) in the stent group,

and 13 (13%) in the bypass group (

p

=

0.68). Limb salvage rate

was 90% in the stent group, and 88% in the bypass group (

p

=

0.68). There were no peri-operative deaths in the stent group,

but one in the bypass group (1%). One-year mortality rate was

equal (8%) in both groups (

p

=

1.00).

Conclusion:

One-year outcome was comparable in both

groups with regard to mortality, stent or graft patency and

limb salvage rates.

Keywords:

superficial femoral artery, stenting, bypass, severe leg

ischaemia

Submitted 8/9/14, accepted 27/11/14

Cardiovasc J Afr

2015;

26

: 34–37

www.cvja.co.za

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2014-074

Symptomatic superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease presenting

either with severe claudication or critical limb ischaemia is

treated with bypass surgery and traditionally has been the ‘gold-

standard’ procedure. Surgical bypass using autogenous vein

or prosthetic grafts as a conduit is well accepted and there are

comparable patencies and limb salvage rates with either conduit.

1

There have been considerable advances in the last two decades

in percutaneous endovascular technology for the treatment of

SFA disease. The techniques that have been developed include

percutaneous balloon angioplasty and stenting, with variable

results.

2,3

Despite having three different options, namely surgical

bypass, balloon angioplasty and stenting, none is superior to the

other.

Although the five-year primary patency rate of femoro-

popliteal above-the-knee bypass with autogenous saphenous vein

is 70%, this method of treatment is invasive with long incisions

in the lower extremities and a peri-operative complication rate

of 12%.

4

Vascular surgeons have become more experienced with

catheter-based technology and due to the minimal invasiveness

of the procedure, both patients and vascular surgeons are

increasingly attracted to endovascular procedures. Mwipatayi

et al

.

5

and Nguyen

et al

.

6

found stenting resulted in equivalent

outcomes when compared to balloon angioplasty alone, but

Laird

et al

.

7

found that self-expanding nitinol stents were

associated with better angiographic results and improved patency

compared with balloon angioplasty alone.

Randomised, controlled trials comparing bypass surgery and

balloon angioplasty alone generally showed similar outcomes in

terms of amputation-free survival but in the short term, surgery

was more expensive than angioplasty.

8

Another study comparing

surgical bypass with balloon angioplasty and stenting showed

better primary patency for the stent group (67%) than the bypass

group (49%) and there were higher re-intervention rates in the

bypass group.

9

Since there are conflicting data in the literature regarding

the success of different methods of treatment of SFA disease

and there is a lack of consensus guidelines on the optimum

management of SFA disease, the aim of this study was to

compare the results of stenting and surgical bypass in the local

environment with regard to limb salvage rates in patients with

severe leg ischaemia.

Methods

Patients with superficial femoral artery (femoro-popliteal)

disease presenting to a single practice, with severe claudication

(crippling), preventing themfromperforming their daily activities,

or critical limb ischaemia, admitted to Entabeni Hospital,

Durban, South Africa between January 2009 and December

2013 were culled from a prospectively maintained database. Two

Department of Vascular Surgery, Grey’s Hospital, Nelson R

Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal,

Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

J Islam, MB BS, DA (SA), FCS (SA), Cert Vasc Surg (SA),

MMedSci (UKZN),

islam@telkomsa.net

University of KwaZulu-Natal, and Entabeni Hospital,

Durban, South Africa

JV Robbs, MB ChB, ChM, FCS (SA), FRCSEd, FRCPS (Glas)