Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  99 / 102 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 99 / 102 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 3, May/June 2016

AFRICA

e17

time, but iatrogenic aorto-oesophagial rupture occurs suddenly

and progresses quickly to haemorrhagic shock.

7,9

Therefore 80

to 90% of aortic injuries are fatal, and immediate aortic repair

is important for survival.

7

In our case, immediate aortic surgery

was carried out after controlling the bleeding with a polyethylene

balloon and CT detection of the injury.

Contrast CT scan is a suggested imaging technique

for detecting the site of aortic injury and its relationship

with surrounding structures.

3

However, angiography can be

undertaken for determining aortic pathology and treatment

of the injury with endovascular techniques.

3,8

Repair with an

endovascular graft is a safer option for acute aortic injury.

However, there is limited experience with this procedure in the

paediatric population and natural progression of the stent is

not fully known. Therefore, open surgical repair is the preferred

technique for paediatric patients with aortic injury.

8,10

In accordance with the therapeutic opportunities of the

surgical centre, an appropriate method should be chosen and an

immediate treatment protocol should be determined. In our case,

we decided on open repair with simultaneous intervention on the

aortic injury and oesophageal rupture.

Conclusion

Aortic wall injury may occur during oesophagoscopy. Balloon

dilatators may be helpful to control bleeding and secure time for

surgical repair. Open aortic repair may ensure patient survival

and it allows simultaneous oesophageal repair.

References

1.

Majeski J, Lynch W, Durst G. Esophageal perforation during esophago-

gastroduodenoscopy.

Am J Surg

2009;

198

(5): e56–57.

2.

Bhatia NL, Collins JM, Nguyen CC, Jaroszewski DE, Vikram HR, Charles

JC. Esophageal perforation as a complication of esophagogastroduodeno-

scopy.

J Hosp Med

2008;

3

(3): 256–262.

3.

Wei Y, Chen L, Wang Y, Yu D, Peng J, Xu J. Proposed management protocol

for ingested esophageal foreign body and aortoesophageal fistula: a single-

center experience.

Int J Clin Exp Med

2015;

8

(1): 607–615. eCollection 2015.

4.

Cheng W, Tam PK. Foreign-body ingestion in children: experience with

1,265 cases.

J Pediatr Surg

1999;

34

: 1472–1476.

5.

Wyllie R. Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract.

Curr Opin Pediatr

2006;

18

: 563–564.

6.

Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, Aydin Y, Yekeler E, Karaoglanoglu N. Current

management of esophageal perforation: 20 years’ experience.

Dis Esophagus

2009;

22

: 374–380.

7.

He S, Chen X, Zhou X, Hu Q, Ananda S, Zhu S. Sudden death due to

traumatic ascending aortic pseudoaneurysms ruptured into the esophagus:

2 case reports.

Medicine

(Baltimore). 2015;

94

(15): e716.

8.

Minor ME, Morrissey NJ, Peress R, Carroccio A, Ellozy S, Agarwal G,

et al

. Endovascular treatment of an iatrogenic thoracic aortic injury after

spinal instrumentation: case report.

J Vasc Surg

2004;

39

(4): 893–896.

9.

Aronberg RM, Punekar SR, Adam SI, Judson BL, Mehra S, Yarbrough

WG. Esophageal perforation caused by edible foreign bodies: a systematic

review of the literature.

Laryngoscope

2015;

125

(2): 371–378.

10. Gunabushanam V, Mishra N, Calderin J, Glick R, Rosca M, Krishnasastry

K. Endovascular stenting of blunt thoracic aortic injury in an 11-year-old.

J Pediatr Surg

2010;

45

(3): E15–18.