Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  35 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 4, July/August 2018

AFRICA

233

Peak apical rotation was measured during the ejection systolic

phase. Basal rotation was measured at a time isochronous to peak

apical systolic rotation, in keeping with a standard protocol used

by our institution, which has previously been published.

22,24,25

Net

instantaneous twist was calculated as peak apical rotation minus

the isochronous basal rotation.

Measurements were independently made by two cardiologists

trained in STE. The combined mean inter-observer variability

for measurements of apical, basal and net twist of renal

patients pre-dialysis was 3.67% (range 2–37%) and post-dialysis

3.7% (range 2.5–31%). The mean intra-observer variability

pre-dialysis was 2.76% (range 2–10%) and post-dialysis 3.72%

(range 2.5–26%).

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using the Statistica version 11 (Statsoft;

Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA) program. Results are expressed as means

with standard deviations or medians for non-normal distribution

or frequencies, and percentages for categorical variables. To

assess differences between the control groups versus pre-dialysis

patients, and control versus post-dialysis patients, the Mann–

Whitney test for non-normally distributed variables was used.

Pre-dialysis and post-dialysis comparisons were performed with

the Wilcoxon matched paired test. Significance was assumed

at two-sided values of

p

< 0.05. Fisher’s exact test was used to

compare categorical data. The Schapiro–Wilk test was used to

assess normality. Univariate linear regression analysis was used

to identify independent factors associated with twist pre-dialysis

and post-dialysis, and change in twist.

Results

Clinical characteristics of control participants and CKD patients

are summarised in Table 1. The mean ages of control versus

CKD patients were 44.0

±

11.4 versus 43.4

±

12.2 years (

p

=

0.81), with a 46% male incidence in both groups. The most

common aetiology of the CKD patients was hypertension (81%).

Weight (mean 66.2

±

8.5 vs 65.2

±

12.9 kg;

p

=

0.44), body mass

index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA) were similar between

the groups (Table 1). By contrast, with the CKD patients, the

pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure,

mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure were significantly

higher compared to levels observed in the control group

(Table 1).

On echocardiography, patients on haemodialysis had

significantly higher pre-dialysis LV diastolic volumes, LV

end-systolic volumes, LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and

stroke volume compared to the controls, whereas there was no

difference in EF and PP/SV (Table 2). In addition, patients on

haemodialysis had significantly thicker LV walls and greater

LV mass compared to controls. LV hypertrophy (LVH) was

present in 88% of renal patients (23 of 26 patients). In those

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients and controls

Characteristics

Control

(

n

=

26)

Pre-dialysis

(

n

=

26)

Post-dialysis

(

n

=

26)

Mean age (years)

44.0

±

11.4 43.4

±

12.2

Male gender,

n

(%)

12 (46)

12 (46)

Height (cm)

163.6

±

8.9 164.0

±

9.6

Weight (kg)

66.2

±

8.5 65.2

±

12.9 63.0

±

12.6

Change in weight (kg)

2.2

±

1.0

Haemoglobin (g/dl)

9.9

±

2.3

-

Heart rate (beats/min)

70.3

±

11.9 81.8

±

11.9* 89.7

±

18.3

Body mass index (kg/m

2

)

24.7

±

2.5 24.2

±

4.0

Body surface area (m

2

)

1.7

±

0.1

1.7

±

0.2

Diabetes mellitus,

n

(%)

0

2 (8)*

Hypertension,

n

(%)

0

22 (81)*

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

122.7

±

5.1 151.8

±

17.6* 145.0

±

24.5

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

75.5

±

10.2 90.1

±

14.1* 88.4

±

16.5

Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)

91.2

±

7.4 110.6

±

13.7* 107.4

±

18.0

Pulse pressure (mmHg)

47.2

±

10.3 61.7

±

14.4* 56.6

±

16.3

Volume ultra-filtrated (l)

2.2

±

0.9

Years on dialysis

6.7

±

3.4

Corrected calcium (mmol/l)

2.3

±

0.3

Corrected calcium (g/dl)

9.2

±

1.3

Phosphate (mmol/l)

1.3

±

0.5

Phosphate (g/dl)

4.1

±

1.7

Calcium × phosphate product (g

2

/dl

2

)

37.6

±

15.5

Parathyroid hormone level (pg/ml)

66

±

68

*

p

-value < 0.05 vs control group,

p

-value < 0.05 vs pre-dialysis group.

Fig. 3.

Basal rotation in the short-axis view.

Fig. 2.

Short-axis view through the apex.