Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 3, May/June 2020

124

AFRICA

events.

12,13

Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare

changes in aortic elastic parameters, using tissue Doppler and

conventional echocardiographic measurements for both right

and left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after LPC and

IVA therapy in infants with ROP.

Methods

This single-centre, retrospective study was performed by

evaluating the medical records of infants who were treated for

ROP in a tertiary centre for screening and treatment of ROP. The

study was carried out between October 2016 and February 2017.

The institutional reviewboard at AdanaNumune Training and

Research Hospital approved the study. Informed written consent

was obtained from all parents or guardians. All procedures

performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the

institutional and/or national research committee and with the

1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

During this period, premature infants who completed the

corrected age of one year were evaluated using echocardiography

for routine cardiac control. Decision about the treatment option

for ROP was made as reported by the indications in the Early

Treatment for ROP (ETROP) study.

3

According to the study,

infants with type 1 pre-threshold ROP, threshold ROP or

aggressive posterior ROP were selected. If infants had treatment-

requiring ROP in the posterior zone (zone I and/or zone II),

anti-VEGF treatment was recommended for them because

laser treatment has low efficacy in posterior disease, along with

decreased visual field and high refractive outcomes.

All parents were informed about the treatment effects and

systemic concerns of the IVA. They were also informed about

LPC treatment regarding its lower efficacy in posterior ROP,

and possible side effects such as preventing peripheral retinal

vascularisation. The parents were then left with the decision of

whether to treat with LPC or IVA. Patients who received laser

or aflibercept treatment as monotherapy and primary treatment

were included in the study.

Patients who were treated at a different centre, who were

administered another treatment option (cryotherapy, surgery

and other anti-VEGF agents) or combined therapy (infants who

received additional treatment after primary treatment) for ROP

and who could not be followed regularly were excluded from the

study. Infants with stage 4 and 5 ROP or infants who underwent

vitreoretinal surgery were also excluded, as were those who had

systemic or ocular disease such as congenital cataract, glaucoma

or other ocular anomalies. Further exclusions were infants with

congenital heart, lung or other systemic disease and dysrhythmia.

Twenty age- and gender-matched patients were selected from

among the patients who were referred for evaluation of an ROP

screening and who did not receive any treatment. They were

found to have normal intra-cardiac structural anatomy and

function.

In this period, 67 medical records were reviewed. Among

them, four patients were treated with combined therapy, six

received other anti-VEGF agents, two were treated at a different

centre, three had ocular or systemic anomaly, and one patient

had stage 4 ROP. These 16 patients were excluded from the study

(Fig. 1).

Thirty-one infants with a history of prematurity who

underwent treatment for ROP were selected for the patient

groups, and 20 infants diagnosed with ROP but who did not need

any treatment were selected as the control group. Infants with

similar demographic features (age, gender, gestational age, birth

weight) were involved in this study.

A total of 31 premature infants with ROP and 20 premature

infantswithoutROPwere included in this study. Theyweredivided

into three groups: the LPC group included 15 infants (mean age:

17 ± 4.4 months) who received diode laser photocoagulation;

and the IVA group included 16 infants (mean age: 14.4 ± 4.9

months) who received only a single dose of intravitreal injection

of aflibercept (1 mg/0.025 ml) as the primary treatment for ROP;

and 20 infants constituted the control group (mean age: 14.5 ±

2.8 months).

Height, weight, birth weight, gestational age and heart rate

of the infants were recorded in both patient groups. Ten minutes

after calming down in the room and while the infants were held in

their parents’ laps, a validated oscillometric device (Omron HEM

907; Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan) was used to measure

systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the right arm with an

appropriate cuff size covering two-thirds of the upper arm.

Laser ablations were performed with an 810-nm diode laser

(IRIDEX; Oculight SL, Mountain View, CA, USA) using a

28-day condensing lens. The laser settings were arranged to a

power ranging between 150 and 250 mW with a duration of

200 m/s and an interval of 200 s, so that a moderately white

laser burn could be achieved. All patients received intravitreal

aflibercept (Eylea

®

, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown,

New York, USA) 1 mg/0.025 ml in the operating room

under sterile conditions with topical anaesthesia, using 0.5%

proparacaine hydrochloride (Alcaine; SA Alcon-Couvreur NV,

Puurs, Belgium) and ketamine sedation. All the treatments were

performed by the same specialist (EAS).

47 infants

4 combined therapy

2 other centres

6 other anti-VEGF

agents

31 evaluated and

screened

3 ocular and systemic

anomaly

1 stage 4 ROP

Fig. 1.

Flow chart of the study population.