Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  48 / 66 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 32, No 3, May/June 2021

158

AFRICA

stroke (Table 2). All the estimates were self-reported conditions.

The total sample size of the studies that were included was

75 140 (41 168 for CHD and 33 972 for stroke).

Only a pooled estimate for prevalence was calculated, since

there were insufficient studies found that reported incidence

rates. The pooled overall prevalence for stroke was 1.29% (95%

CI = 0.83; 1.75,

I

2

= 97.2%,

p

-value = 0.000), and for CHD it was

4.29% (95% CI = 3.13; 5.45,

I

2

= 95.8%,

p

-value = 0.000). The

I

2

statistic showed high between-study heterogeneity, greater than

90% for both CHD and stroke (Figs 2, 3).

As a sensitivity analysis, outlying studies were excluded to

assess whether the effect estimate was greatly influenced (Table

3). For stroke, Phaswana-Mufaya

et al

.

26

and Shisana

et al

.

27

were individually removed, and then both were removed at the

same time. The overall effect estimate was reduced from 1.29

to 0.92 when Phaswana-Mufaya

et al

. was excluded, and went

down slightly to 1.20 when Shisana

et al

. was excluded. The

heterogeneity was smallest (

I

2

= 90.7%), although still quite large,

when both studies were removed and therefore had the most

profound influence on the overall prevalence effect estimate.

Identification

Screening

Eligibility

Included

Records identified

through database

searching

(

n

= 2 959)

Additional records

Identified through

other sources

(

n

= 20)

Records after duplicates removed

(

n

= 2 466)

Records screened

(

n

= 2 466)

Records excluded

(

n

= 2343)

Full-text articles

assessed for

eligibility

(

n

= 123)

Full-text articles

excluded, with

reasons (

n

= 111)

Studies did not

report incidence or

prevalence of stroke/

CHD

Full-text articles not

found

Studies included

only populations that

had stroke/CHD

Studies included

in quantitative

synthesis

(meta-analysis)

(

n

= 12)

Fig. 1.

Study-selection process using the PRISMA flow

diagram.

Table 2. Final CHD and stroke studies included in the meta-analysis

Author, year

Study period

Case definition

Coronary heart disease

South African Demographic

Health Survey, 1998

24

1998

Self-reported CHD

South African Demographic

Health Survey, 2003

25

2003

Self-reported CHD

Phaswana-Mafuya

et al

., 2013

26

2008

Self-reported angina

Shisana

et al

., 2014

27

2012 Self-reported heart disease (heart

attack, angina or chest pain)

Arokiasamy

et al

., 2016

28

2007–2010

Self-reported angina

Stroke

South African Demographic

Health Survey, 1998

24

1998

Self-reported stroke

Phaswana-Mafuya

et al

., 2013

26

2008

Self-reported stroke

Shisana

et al

., 2014

27

2012

Self-reported stroke

Wandai and Day, 2015

29

2008

Self-reported stroke

Wandai and Day, 2015

29

2010

Self-reported stroke

Wandai and Day, 2015

29

2012

Self-reported stroke

Wandai and Day, 2015

29

2013

Self-reported stroke

Table 3. Sensitivity analysis with outlying studies

and those with gender breakdowns excluded

Condition Meta-analysis

Number

of studies

Esti-

mate 95% CI

Higgins

I

2

(%)

Without outlying studies

CHD All studies

5

4.29 3.13 5.45 95.8

Excluding Shisana

et al

.

26

4

4.75 4.25 5.25 65.6

Stroke All studies

7

1.29 0.83 1.75 97.2

Excluding Phaswana-Mufa-

ya

et al

.

26

6

0.92 0.58 1.26 95.0

Excluding Shisana

et al

.

27

6

1.20 0.74 1.65 96.9

Excluding both

5

0.75 0.49 1.01 90.7

Without those with gender breakdowns

CHD All studies

5

4.29 3.13 5.45 95.8

Excluding Arokiasamy

et al

.;

29

SADHS;

24

Shisana

et al

.

27

2

4.63 3.61 5.66 82.1

Stroke All studies

7

1.29 0.83 1.75 97.2

Excluding SADHS;

24

Shisa-

na

et al

.

27

5

1.26 0.70 1.83 97.3

Study authors

SADHS, 1998

4.80 (4.45,5.17)

4.15 (3.70, 4.60)

5.20 (4.99,6.48)

2.20 (1.80,2.70)

5.30 (4.20, 6.50)

4.29 (3.13, 5,45)

5

0

Effect (95% Cl)

(%)

Weight

21.02

20.78

19.70

20.78

17.72

100.00

SADHS, 2003

Phaswana-Mafuya

et al

., 2013

Shisana

et al

., 2014

Arokiasamy

et al

., 2016

Overall (

I

2

= 95.8%)

Weights are from random-effects model.

SADHS, South Africa Demographic Health Survey.

Fig. 2.

Pooled prevalence rates of CHD.

Study authors

SADHS, 1998

0.98 (0.83, 1.16)

4.00 (3.05, 4.26)

1.80 (1.50, 2.10)

0.90 (0.60, 1.20)

0.80 (0.70, 1.10)

0.70 (0.50, 0.90)

0.40 (0.30, 0.50)

1.29 (0.83, 1.75)

0

Effect (95% Cl)

(%)

Weight

14.88

12.02

14.26

14.26

14.76

14.76

15.07

100.00

Phaswana-Mafuya

et al

.,2013

Shisana

et al

., 2014

Wandai and Day, 2015

Wandai and Day, 2015

Wandai and Day, 2015

Wandai and Day, 2015

Overall (

I

2

= 95.8%)

Weights are from random-effects model.

SADHS, South Africa Demographic Health Survey.

5

Fig. 3.

Pooled prevalence rates of stroke.