Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 66 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 32, No 3, May/June 2021

154

AFRICA

disability, often in advanced heart failure, which impacted on

postoperative outcomes and contributed to significant morbidity

and/or mortality. Wisenbaugh

et al

. have documented that

patients in developing countries may present for the first time

when EF is < 60% or ESD > 45 mm.

25

These patients tend to

suffer poorer outcomes following MVR and would likely benefit

from mitral valve repair, even though repair undertaken in RHD

is technically more difficult than with degenerative MR.

4

A more worrying explanation for delayed surgery is that

clinicians may not be applying established guidelines in referring

patients more timeously for surgery. Patients with moderate-

to-severe MR are assessed by more junior staff who may

not request an echocardiographic assessment because of the

demands of a busy clinic, and because such patients are

relatively asymptomatic, they may be given repeated follow-up

appointments in the assumption that all is well in stable patients.

Symptoms often occur late in the course of MR since the

compliance properties of the LA allow it to accommodate

large volumes of blood before a significant rise in pressure

is transferred to the pulmonary circulation. With increasing

severity of regurgitation, contractile dysfunction may supervene,

often preceding the onset of dyspnoeic symptoms.

An EF < 60% has been shown to be associated with poorer

survival rates after corrective surgery and is likely to indicate

underlying contractile dysfunction inMR patients.

3,8,26

The majority

of our patients had markedly enlarged LA sizes (

n

= 84, 66% with

LA

> 55 mm) and elevated PASP (

n

= 66, 50% with PASP > 60

mmHg), indicating that these subjects had severe chronic MR

of sufficiently long duration for such advanced changes to have

developed. Chronic MR therefore requires careful monitoring by

experienced clinicians and repeated echocardiographic assessments,

which would reveal the onset of ventricular decompensation and

the need for early surgery in such cases.

The timing of surgery in patients with severe MR is a critical

factor in the preservation of myocardial function.

27-29

Wisenbaugh

et al

. have shown that pre-operative ESD is the only independent

predictor of postoperative death.

25

Whereas a good outcome was

predicted at a pre-operative ESD of 40 mm, they showed that

the risk of severe heart failure and/or death sharply increased

when it reached 51 mm. Taking these observations into account,

the recommended optimal time for surgery can be derived at an

LVESD between 40 and 50 mm, MV repair being the preferred

surgical intervention when LVESD reaches 50 mm.

8,12,15

Pulmonary hypertension is another independent predictor

of postoperative mortality, with the risk of death or occurrence

of heart failure being twice as high as in patients without

pulmonary hypertension.

30,31,33

The presence of pulmonary

hypertension depends on the severity of MR, the functional class

of the patient and the presence of LV dysfunction.

32,33

Significant

pulmonary hypertension (PAS > 50 mmHg) has been reported in

20 to 30% of patients with severe MR

30

and 64% of patients who

are in NYHA functional class III–IV.

31

The pre-operative PASP

was elevated beyond 50 mmHg in all EF groups in our study.

The majority of our patients was symptomatic and was

receiving heart-failure treatment, including ACE inhibitors.

Controlling symptoms in these patients with medical therapy

in the belief that LV function and cavity size are stable in such

patients is a misinterpretation of the evidence-based guidelines

for intervention, which recommend surgery in symptomatic

severe MR regardless of chamber dimensions.

5,27

The current

paradigm for managing severe MR is to offer early surgery in

these patients because of the difficulty in diagnosing underlying

LV dysfunction and because the long-term outcome may be

poor, even in subjects with good LV function as assessed by EF.

It is well established that pre-operative EF does not predict

long-term outcome following MVR.

27,34

Furthermore, surgery

may now be accomplished with low morbidity rates since

surgical outcomes have improved considerably with better

cardioprotection, and also with using the technique of MV

repair in subjects with significantly impaired LV function.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, among them being the

retrospective design, which resulted in incomplete datasets for

analysis, and the use of raw echocardiographic data, which were

not indexed to body surface area. Routine HIV testing prior to

surgery was not a prerequisite to surgery in the early years when

many subjects were not tested. In our study, HIV infection did

not explain the impaired LV function in the group with EF

40–49%. Furthermore, the low cardiac-related mortality rate

in our study (4%) may not be a true reflection of mortality, as

nearly one-quarter of patients failed to return for follow up. The

poor follow up after the six-week visit also resulted in reduced

numbers of matched pairs for comparison, thereby reducing

the total number of patients whose data could be interrogated

for statistical purposes. Also, in our study we did not routinely

use quantitative measurements such as calculation of the

effective orifice area and regurgitant fraction, which are now

recommended in both sets of guidelines.

4,5

Lastly, our cohort

of MR did not include patients with pre-operative EF < 40%

submitted for MVR as per the policy of our surgical unit, and

we could not make firm inferences from this small sample with

significantly impaired LV function.

Conclusion

In this study, a significant number of subjects with severe MR

presented with advanced symptoms and/or decompensated

HF with echocardiographic parameters that were well beyond

the guidelines recommended for surgical intervention. While

it is reassuring that surgical intervention improved cardiac

dynamics and LV function in the ensuing three to six months in

subjects with mildly impaired LV function, a cohort of patients

remained with impaired LV function, in part due to delayed

surgery. Several factors accounted for surgery being performed

in the very late stages of the natural history of MR in our

patients, among them the primary reason being socio-economic

challenges associated with lack of access to healthcare as a

result of a failing public healthcare system. Pre-operative ESD

was the only predictor of postoperative LV dysfunction. Chronic

organic MR therefore requires careful clinical surveillance and

prompt referral for regular echocardiographic assessment to

enable early detection of LV dilatation and timeous surgery in

order to preserve ventricular function.

References

1.

Sliwa K, Carrington M, Mayosi BM, Zigiriadis E, Mvungi R, Stewart S.

Incidence and characteristics of newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease