48 / 72
CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 2, March/April 2016
102
AFRICA
14. Williams PA, Fletcher S. Health effects of prenatal radiation exposure.
Am Fam Physician
2010;
82
(5): 488–493.
15. Blot WJ, Miller RW. Mental retardation following in utero exposure to
the atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Radiology
1973;
106
:
617–619.
16. Yamazaki JN, Schull WJ. Perinatal loss and neurological abnormalities
among children of the atomic bomb: Nagasaki and Hiroshima revisited,
1949 to 1989.
J Am Med Assoc
1990;
264
: 605–609.
17. Otake M, Schull WJ.
In utero
exposure to A-bomb radiation and mental
retardation: a reassessment.
Br J Radiol
1984;
57
: 409–414.
18. Miller RW. Epidemiological conclusions from radiation toxicity stud-
ies. In: Fry RJ, Grahn D, Griem ML, Rust JH, eds.
Late Effects of
Radiation
. London: Taylor & Francis, 1970.
19. Bithell JF, Stiller CA. A new calculation of the carcinogenic risk of
obstetric X-raying.
Stat Med
1988;
7
: 857–864.
20. Colletti PM, Lee KH, Elkayam U. Cardiovascular imaging of the preg-
nant patient.
Am J Roentgenol
2013;
200
: 515–521.
21. Schull WJ, Otake M. Cognitive function and prenatal exposure to ioniz-
ing radiation.
Teratology
1999;
59
: 222–226.
22. Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Board on
Radiation Effects Research, Commission on Life Sciences, National
Research Council. Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing
radiation. In: Beir V (ed). Washington, DC: National Academy Press,
1990.
23. Brent RL. The effects of embryonic and fetal exposure to ionizing radia-
tion: counseling the patient and worker about these risks. In: Mossman
KL, Mill WA (eds).
The Biological Basis of Radiation Protection
Practice
. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1992: 3.
24. Brady JV, Reiter RJ. Neurobehavioural effects. In:
Health Effects of
Low-Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields.
Prepared by an Oak
Ridge Associated Universities Panel for the Committee on Interagency
Radiation Research and Policy Coordination (ORAU 92/F8, Chapter
7), Oak Ridge, TN, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, p. vii-1-vii-56.
25. A report of the committee to review the use of ionizing radiation for
the treatment of benign diseases, Assembly of Life Sciences, National
Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. In: Hilberg AW, telles
NC, eds.
A Review of the Use of Ionizing Radiation for the Treatement of
Benign Diseases.
Rockville (MD): US Department of Health Education
and Welfare, 1977.
26. Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE. Principles of digital radiography
with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics.
Radiology
1999;
210
: 595–599.
27. Nikolaos K, Dimitrios M, Nikolaos T, Alexandros R. Exposure to
ionizing radiation and pregnancy.
Hellenic J Obstet Gynecol
2015;
14
(2):
49–56.
28. Russell JR, Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Watson EE. Radiation absorbed
dose to the embryo/fetus from radiopharmaceuticals.
Health Phys
1997;
73
: 756–769.
29. Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Perisinakis K,
et al.
Conceptus
radiation dose and risk from cardiac cathether ablation procedures.
Circulation
2001;
104
: 893–897.
30. Otto CM. Principles of echocardiographic image acquisition and
Doppler analysis. In: Otto CM.
Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography
(5th edn). Philadelphia, USA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2013, ch 1.
31. Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, Beller GA, Bierman FZ,
Davis JL. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical appli-
cation of echocardiography: summary article. A report of the American
College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997
Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography).
J Am Soc
Echocardiogr
2003;
16
(10): 1091–1110.
32. Hung J, Lang R, Flachskampf F, Shernn SK, McCulloch ML, Adams
DB,
et al
. 3D echocardiography: A review of current status and future
directions. ASE Position Paper.
J Am Soc Echocariogr
2007;
20
:
213–233.
33. Ho CY, Solomon SD. A clinician’s guide to tissue Doppler imaging.
Circulation
2006;
113
: e396–e398.
34. Gorcsan J, Tanaka H. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial
strain.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2011;
58
: 1401–1413.
35. Copel JA, Pilu G, Green J, Hobbins JC, Kleinman CS. Fetal echocar-
diographic screening for congenital heart disease: the importance of the
four-chamber view.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1987;
157
: 648–655
36. US Department of Health and Human Services/Food and Drug
Administration/Centre for Devices and Radiological Health/
Radiological Devices Branch/Division of Reproductive, Abdominal
and Radiological Devices/Office of Device Evaluation/Division of Solid
and Fluid Mechanics/Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories.
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff – Information for Manufacturers
Seeking Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and
Transducers. US Food and Drug Administration; September 9, 2008.
37. Abramowics JS, Barnett SB, Duck FA, Edmonds PD, Hynynen KH,
Ziskin MC. Fetal thermal effects of diagnostic ultrasound.
J Ultrasound
Med
2008;
27
: 541–559.
38. Dorbala S, Brozena S, Zeb S, Galatro K, Homel P, Ren JF,
et al
. Risk
stratification of women with peripartum cardiomyopathy at initial
presentation: a dobutamine stress echocardiographic study.
J Am Soc
Echocardiogr
2005;
18
: 45–48.
39. Goldman LW. Principles of CT and CT Technology.
J Nucl Med Technol
2007;
35
(3): 115–128.
40. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – An increasing source of
radiation exposure.
N Eng J Med
2007;
357
: 2277–2284.
41. Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ, Ye SJ, Park CM, Chun EJ,
et al
. Radiation
dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to
practice.
Radiographics
2008;
28
(5): 1451–1459.
42. Hunsaker AR, Lu MT, Goldhaber SZ, Rybicki FJ. Advances in cardio-
vascular imaging: Imaging in acute pulmonary embolism with special
clinical scenarios.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
2010;
3
: 491–500.
43. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, Greenspan RH, Hales CA,
Saltzman HA,
et al
. Complications and validity of pulmonary angi-
ography in acute pulmonary embolism
. Circulation
1992;
85
: 462–468.
44. MacKenzie JD, Nazario-Larrieu J, Cai T, Ledbetter MS, Duran-
Mendicutti MA, Judy PF,
et al
. Reduced-dose CT: effect on reader
evaluation in detection of pulmonary embolism.
Am J Roentgenol
2007;
189
: 1371–1379.
45. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, Kipfmueller F, Costello P, Goldhaber
SZ,
et al
. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in
patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.
J Am
Med Assoc
2005;
293
: 2012–2017.
46. Chan WS, Ray JG, Murray S, Coady GE, Coates, G, Ginsberg, JS.
Suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: Clinical presentation,
results of lung scanning, and subsequent maternal and pediatric
outcomes.
Arch Intern Med
2002;
162
: 1170–1175.
47. Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC,
Lombardo GT. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radia-
tion dose with helical CT.
Radiology
2002;
224
: 487–492.
48. Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Vrahoriti H, Kontakis G, Varveris H,
Gourtsoyiannis N. Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual
X-ray absorptiometry examinations.
Osteopros Int
2002;
13:
716–722.
49. Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Circulation
2010;
121
:
692–705.