CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 2, March/April 2016
100
AFRICA
from MR in pregnancy, the current guidelines of the FDA
require labelling of MR devices to indicate that the safety of
MRI with regard to the foetus ‘has not been established’.
Nuclear cardiovascular imaging
Diagnostic nuclear medicine investigations also involve ionising
radiation. Unlike X-rays, nuclear techniques involve the
inhalation, ingestion or injection of a small quantity of a
radioactive isotope bound in a substance that targets a particular
organ, for example the heart. The gamma radiation emitted
by the radioactive isotope is detected outside the body by
electronic receptors of a gamma camera, which displays images
or functional data about the heart.
59
The most commonly used radioisotope, technetium-99m
(
99m
Tc), is a metastable daughter product following negative
beta decay of molybdenum-99.
99m
Tc decays to
99
Tc with a half-
life of six hours, releasing a mono-energetic gamma photon of
140 keV.
60
Nuclear studies that may be performed during pregnancy
include ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy for diagnosis of
pulmonary embolism, myocardial perfusion imaging where
99m
Tc
may be combined with several compounds that localise to active
myocardial cells, allowing ischaemic areas of the heart to be
determined, and, less commonly, cardiac ventriculography where
99m
Tc can be used to evaluate cardiac function (ejection fraction)
by imaging the ventricles. The dose of radiation passed on to the
foetus during a ventilation-perfusion scan is about 0.05 rad.
61
Along with conventional gamma scintigraphic imaging, the
two major nuclear imaging techniques are positron-emission
tomography (PET) and single photon-emission computed
tomography (SPECT). Both imaging modalities are now
standard in the major nuclear medicine services.
PET is based on the principle of positron annihilation by
using radionuclides that decay through positive beta decay.
62
Positrons generated by the decay combine with an electron and
annihilate, releasing two photons, with energies of 0.51 MeV, in
the process. The photons are released in opposite directions.
The most commonly used compound for PET imaging is
fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (
18
FDG), which is initially metabolised
within the cell, is unable to progress to the citric acid cycle, and
is not easily excreted by the cell.
62
Hence, cells that have a high
glucose metabolism concentrate,
18
FDG, can then be imaged.
The sections are reconstructed by algorithms, similar to but more
complex than those used for conventional CT, to accommodate
the 3D acquisition geometries.
63
Correction by considering the
physical phenomena provides an image representative of the
distribution of the tracer within the heart. In PET scanning, an
effective dose of the order of 8 mSv is delivered to the patient.
64
SPECT imaging is based on detectors that rotate around the
patient to obtain a digital representation of a 3D radioactive
distribution of the chest. The injected radioactive tracers emit
during their disintegration, gamma photons, which are detected
by an external detector after passing through the surrounding
tissue.
65
In SPECT, the main radioactive isotopes are
99m
Tc,
iodine and thallium-201 (which is used primarily for studies on
the heart). To increase the sensitivity and resolution of SPECT
systems, converging channel collimators were developed.
66
Both PET and SPECT benefit from electrocardiographic
gating used to enhance tomographic myocardial scintigraphy.
Therefore, the radioactivity from the myocardium and the
electrical activity of the heart are coupled. Depending on the
procedure, the mother and baby will generally receive a small
radiation dose with SPECT. It is unlikely that any diagnostic
nuclear medicine investigation would result in the radiation dose
of the foetus approaching 20 mGy. It is ideal that radioactive
isotopes are avoided during pregnancy. However, if there is a real
clinical need for such imaging to be performed, the risk to the
mother and foetus is minimal.
20
Contrast agents
A variety of oral and intravascular contrast agents are used with
X-ray and MR procedures. Radiopaque agents used with CT
and conventional radiography contain derivatives of iodine and
have not been studied comprehensively in human pregnancy.
However, iohexol, iopamidol, iothalamate, ioversol, ioxaglate
and metrizamide have been studied in animals and do not appear
to be teratogenic.
67
Neonatal hypothyroidism has been associated with some
iodinated agents taken during pregnancy.
68
Therefore iodine-
based contrast agents are relatively contra-indicated in
pregnancy, unless absolutely essential for a correct diagnosis.
Studies requiring views before and after the administration of
contrast agents will necessarily have greater radiation exposure.
While most contrast agents pass into the breast milk, they have
not been associated with problems in nursing babies.
67
Despite
in vitro
concerns, iodinated contrast agents seem safe to use in
pregnancy.
69
Radioactive isotopes of iodine are mutagenic and
are absolutely contra-indicated during the pregnancy.
70
Paramagnetic contrast agents used during CMR have not
been studied systematically in pregnant women. Animal studies
have demonstrated increased rates of spontaneous abortion,
skeletal abnormalities, and visceral abnormalities when given
at two to seven times the recommended human dose.
71
It is not
clear whether gadolinium-based contrast agents are excreted
into human breast milk. It is important to emphasise that
gadolinium-based contrast agents have not been associated with
any harm in human pregnancy.
72,73
The 2007 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidance for
safe MR practices (expanded and updated in 2013) recommends
that intravenous gadolinium should be avoided in pregnancy and
should only be used if absolutely essential, until there is further
information about these agents.
74,75
Consequently, the FDA has
classified gadolinium as a category C drug, meaning it can be
considered in pregnancy ‘if the potential benefits justify the
potential risks to the fetus’.
Safety counselling
When a pregnant mother considers any radiation exposure,
the most prominent question in her mind is likely to be, ‘Is this
safe for my baby?’ To answer this question, the physician must
carefully choose words that will help a patient understand the real,
although very small, risks of exposure. The general population’s
total risk of spontaneous abortion, major malformations, mental
retardation and childhood malignancy is approximately 286 per
1 000 deliveries. Exposing a foetus to 0.50 rad adds only about
0.17 cases per 1 000 deliveries to this baseline rate, or about one
additional case in 6 000.
6
Such numbers often do not make much