Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  60 / 82 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 82 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 1, January/February 2018

58

AFRICA

beta-blockade in MR, however, other studies do not support

this.

108,146,197,200,201

The reasons for the discrepancies in these findings

are unclear but some explanations can be proposed.

Firstly, the studies have been performed in different

experimental models and at different stages in the evolution

of MR-related left ventricular remodelling. Many of the

experiments performed thus far have been in animal models

with controlled formation of volume overload showing that early

introduction of beta-blocker therapy

89,90,118

may be beneficial, and

this is supported to some extent by the work of Ahmed

et al

.

199

in

humans. However, there appears to be a time-dependent pattern

during remodelling of the LV in chronic primary MR.

Early after the development of MR there is a marked

increase in inflammatory and neurohormonal response to the

acute volume overload.

26,113

A period of compensation and a

relatively normal inflammatory response appears to follow

until the late decompensated stage is reached, when adverse

pathway activation seems to increase.

26

Depending on when in

this evolution of left ventricular remodelling the studies to date

have been performed, there may be discrepancies in the findings

with regard to the impact of beta-blockade on left ventricular

remodelling. Beta-blockade may have more impressive effects

if used early in the evolution of volume overload-related left

ventricular remodelling but it may be less effective later on.

Secondly, various beta-adrenergic agents have been tested

under different circumstances. Compared to the impressive

beneficial results in heart failure patients with the mixed

adrenergic blocker, carvedilol,

158,202

Pu

et al

.

201

demonstrated

Table 1. Studies of beta-blocker therapy and left ventricular function in primary MR

Authors

Year Subject Cause of MR

Number treated

with BB Type of study Control

Type of BB

Duration

of BB Outcome measures

Favours BB

Tsutsui

et al

.

89

1994 Dog Experimental

chordal rupture

n

=

6

Case

controlled

n

=

6

Atenolol 50

mg daily

3 months Cardiocyte contrac-

tility, myofibrillar

density

+

Nemoto

et al

.

144

2002 Dog Experimental

chordal rupture

n

=

11

Longitudinal NA

Atenolol

100 mg

daily

3 months Haemodynamics, LV

function

+

Tallaj

et al

.

117

2003 Dog Experimental

chordal rupture

2 weeks

MR+BB:

n

=

6

4 weeks

MR+BB:

n

=

8

Case

controlled

Normal:

n

=

8

2 weeks

MR:

n

=

8

4 weeks

MR:

n

=

6

Metoprolol

succinate

100 mg

daily

4 weeks RAAS activation +

Hankes

et al

.

88

2006 Dog Experimental

chordal rupture

4 weeks of

MR+BB

=

8

Case

controlled

Normal

=

6

Untreated

MR

=

6

Metoprolol

succinate

100 mg

daily

4 weeks NE release into

cardiac interstitium

+

Oh

et al

.

145

2007 Human 71% degenera-

tive

n

=

134

Retrospective

cohort

NA

Not ascer-

tained

1–88

months

Echo LVEF

Pat

et al

.

199

2008 Dog Experimental

chordal rupture

n

=

11

Case

controlled

n

=

10

Metoprolol

succinate

100 mg

twice daily

4 months LV remodelling

by MRI and echo;

cardiomyocyte

function

Improved cardiomyocyte

function and BB recep-

tiveness but failure to

attenuate remodelling

Sabri

et al

.

107

2008 Dog Experimental

chordal rupture

n

=

6

Case

controlled

Normal

=

6

Untreated

MR

=

6

Metoprolol

succinate

100 mg

daily

4 weeks LV remodelling by

echo; interstitial

collagen quantifica-

tion; FAK signalling

(integrin signalling)

BB reduced FAK tyro-

sine phosphorylation but

no change in remodeling

parameters; BB reduced

epicardial collagen loss

but not endocardial

collagen loss

Varadara-

jan

et al

.

197

2008 Human LVEF

>

55% +

‘severe MR’

n

=

218

Retrospective

observational

cohort study

n

=

614

Not stated 8 years Mortality

+

Stewart

et al

.

195

2008 Human MVP

n

=

25

Double-blind

cross-over

study

NA

Metoprolol

to a maxi-

mum 190

mg daily

14 days MRI

EF

LVEDV

LVESV

LV ‘work’ (CO)

+

Ahmed

et al

.

198

2012 Human MVP

n

=

19

RCT

n

=

19

Toprol XL

25–100 mg

daily

MRI LVEF

MRI LVESV

LV longitudinal

strain rate

+

Pu

et al

.

200

2013 Rat

Experimental

leaflet disrup-

tion

n

=

43

‘Long-term’

BB in 19

RCT

n

=

44

Carvedilol

(1 200 ppm)

36 weeks Echo only

LV dimensions

LVESV and mass

index

FS and EF

Survival probability

Trappanese

et al

.

179

2015 Dog Experimental

chordal rupture

n

=

8

(MR + BB)

Case

controlled

Normal

=

10

Untreated

MR

=

8

Metoprolol

succinate

100 mg

daily

4 weeks Activation of

β

3AR/

NO-cGMP signalling

β

3

-AR expression

+

+

BB

=

beta-blocker; MVP

=

mitral valve prolapse; RCT

=

randomised controlled trial; MR

=

mitral regurgitation; NE

=

norepinephrine; + indicates that the study favoured

BB therapy in primary MR; – indicates that the study did not favour BB therapy in primary MR; LV

=

left ventricle; LVEF

=

left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDV

=

left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV

=

left ventricular end-systolic volume; CO

=

cardiac output; RAAS

=

renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system; echo

=

echocar-

diogram; MRI

=

magnetic resonance imaging; ppm = parts per million.