Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  18 / 62 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 62 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 1, January/February 2020

16

AFRICA

OPCAB surgery with an alternative retraction method:

a single-centre experience

Erdem Cetin, Tolga Can, Celal Selcuk Unal, Aydin Keskin, Emre Kubat

Abstract

Background:

The off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)

technique, which is used in order to avoid the side effects of

cardiopulmonary bypass, is often questioned in terms of its

efficacy and safety. Also, in this technique, surgeon experi-

ence plays a very important role. In this study, we share the

results of our 606 OPCAB cases with an alternative retraction

technique.

Methods:

This study was a retrospective analysis of OPCAB

operations performed between January 2014 and December

2018. Patients were evaluated and operated on by a surgical

team led by an experienced OPCAB surgeon with over 200

prior OPCAB surgeries.

Results:

The study included 606 OPCAB cases, and 21.8%

(132) were female and 78.2% (474) were male. Our mortality

rate was 1.7% (

n

= 10) and only two patients suffered a cere-

brovascular incident. A statistically significant difference was

found between pre-operative and six-month postoperative left

ventricular ejection fraction values (

p

<

0.01).

Conclusion:

The OPCAB technique can be performed with

similar results to on-pump surgery when conducted by an

experienced surgeon, as in our study.

Keywords:

on-pump coronary artery bypass, alternative method

Submitted 1/3/19, accepted 21/6/19

Published online 15/7/19

Cardiovasc J Afr

2020;

31

: 16–20

www.cvja.co.za

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2019-038

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is a treatment

that improves survival in advanced coronary artery disease. The

off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) technique, which

is used in order to avoid the side effects of cardiopulmonary

bypass (CPB), is often questioned in terms of its efficacy and

safety. Although there are over 100 randomised controlled trials

and 60 meta-analyses, the superiority of one technique over the

other has not been clearly demonstrated.

1

While some studies

did not show any difference between the two techniques,

2,3

one

study showed that OPCAB resulted in decreased mortality and

morbidity rates and hospitalisation time.

4

In these studies, another important criterion in determining

the effectiveness of OPCAB was the case volume of the

institution and the surgeon. In a study by Benedetto

et al

.,

5

five-year follow-up results of 1 260 OPCAB and 1 700 on-pump

coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) operations were published.

The experience of the surgeons who performed the cases was

also evaluated. Surgeons performing sporadic (one to five

cases) OPCAB operations had a high conversion rate, low graft

count and high mortality rate. OPCAB results of high-volume

surgeons were found to be similar to ONCAB surgery.

In our centre, CABG operations are routinely performed by

a single team using the off-pump technique. In this study, we

share the results of our 606 OPCAB cases and the alternative

technique we used for retraction and positioning of the heart.

Methods

This descriptive study is a retrospective analysis of OPCAB

operations performed between January 2014 and December 2018.

For all patients the OPCAB technique was routinely chosen, and

there were no exclusion criteria. Patients were evaluated and

operated on by a surgical team led by an experienced OPCAB

surgeon (over 200 prior OPCAB surgeries).

All patients were sedated with 2 mg IV midazolam and

anaesthesia induction was done with fentanyl 10 µg/kg,

midazolam 0.1 mg/kg and rocuronium 1 mg/kg. In order to

prevent possible cardiac oedema during the positioning of the

heart, 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone was routinely given to all

of our patients as well as pheniramine IV in order to prevent

possible reactions during protamine administration. Following

100–200 IU/kg heparinisation, the activated clotting time (ACT)

was kept between 200 and 400 seconds. In order to benefit from

its anti-arrhythmic effects, 1 mg/kg lidocaine 2.5% IV and 10

ml 15% magnesium sulfate were administered during internal

thoracic artery harvest. Potassium levels were closely monitored

and kept above 4.0 mEq/ml.

After left internal mammary artery (LIMA) harvesting,

the pericardium was opened and a deep pericardial suture was

placed to elevate the heart. The right pleura was opened in all

patients if the circumflex (Cx) coronary artery and its branches

were targeted for bypass, thereby preventing haemodynamic

deterioration during retraction of the heart. In addition,

moistened gauzes were placed through transfer and oblique

sinuses. With the placement of these gauzes, the heart could be

retracted more efficiently. The retraction gauzes were used to

hold the heart until the anastomosis area was determined, as

if the operation was done with CPB, and thereafter, the tissue

stabilisation system (Octopus

®

Evolution, Medtronic) was used.

During anastomosis of the left anterior descending (LAD)

artery to the LIMA, the gauzes were loosened in order to avoid

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Karabuk University

Training and Research Hospital, Karabuk, Turkey

Erdem Cetin, MD,

Tolga Can, MD

Celal Selcuk Unal, MD

Aydin Keskin, MD

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gülhane Training

and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Emre Kubat, MD