Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  32 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 5, September/October 2020

252

AFRICA

Effect of invasive strategy on long-term mortality in

elderly patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome

Samet Yilmaz, Mehmet Koray Adali, Oguz Kilic, Aysen Til, Yalin Tolga Yaylali

Abstract

Objective:

The elderly have the highest incidence of cardio-

vascular disease and frequently present with acute coronary

syndrome (ACS). In this study, our aim was to evaluate

the effect of an invasive strategy on long-term mortality in

patients of 80 years and older presenting with ACS.

Methods:

Patients who were admitted to hospital with ACS

were recruited using appropriate ICD codes in the comput-

erised hospital data system. After exclusion of patients below

80 years old, the remaining 156 patients were involved in the

final analyses. Ninety-four of 156 patients (60.3%) underwent

coronary angiography and they constituted the invasive-

strategy group, whereas the remaining 62 (39.7%) patients

were treated medically and they constituted the conservative-

strategy group.

Results:

Median follow-up duration of patients was 8.5 (0–61)

months. Total mortality at the end of the follow-up period

was 24 (25.5%) patients in the invasive-strategy group and

30 (48.4%) in the conservative-strategy group (

p

=

0.006).

According to Cox regression analysis, the invasive strategy

(OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12–0.56, p

=

0.001), presentation with

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR: 7.76, 95%

CI: 1.74–34.57, p

=

0.002), low ejection fraction below 40%

(OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.43–6.76,

p

=

0.004), heart rate (OR:

0.98, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99, p

=

0.013) and GRACE risk score

between 150 and 170 (OR: 7.76, 95% CI: 1.74–34.57,

p

=

0.002) were related to long-term mortality.

Conclusions:

Our results show the benefit of the invasive strat-

egy on mortality rate in elderly patients over 80 years old and

presenting with ACS.

Keywords:

elderly, acute coronary syndrome, mortality

SSubmitted 21/8/19, accepted 24/5/20

Published online 22/6/20

Cardiovasc J Afr

2020;

31

: 252–256

www.cvja.co.za

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-011

With the aging of societies, the elderly population is increasing.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not only the causative factor

for mortality in younger people but is also one of the major

causes of death in elderly people.

1

Coronary atherosclerosis is

a dynamic process and progresses over time, so aging is a well-

known risk factor for coronary artery disease.

Patients over 80 years account for more than one-third of

those presenting with ACS and for more than 50% of in-hospital

mortality due to ACS.

2

However, randomised, controlled trials

have given less importance to elderly patients. For example, in the

TRITON-TIMI 38 study, 13% of the patients and in the PLATO

study, 15% of the patients were over the age of 75 years.

3,4

Therefore

scientific evidence concerning elderly patients in ACS is scarce.

There are no specific guidelines concerning the treatment of

elderly patients, hence the treatment strategy is not clear in this

population.

5

Elderly patients diagnosed with ACS represent a

high-risk population and therefore they should be treated more

aggressively.

Over the last decade, an almost linear decrease in rates

of mortality after ACS has been reported in all age classes,

including the very elderly, in association with both the increased

use of early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and

recommended medications.

6

Registry data from Europe showed

that, over the last 15 years, the progressive switch from a

conservative treatment to a more invasive approach may have

contributed to reduction in mortality rates across the ACS

spectrum, irrespective of age and gender.

7,8

In this trial, our aim was to demonstrate the effect of the

invasive strategy on long-term mortality rates in patients 80 years

and older presenting with ACS.

Methods

Patients who were hospitalised due to a diagnosis of ACS

between August 2014 and October 2017 were retrospectively

screened for this trial. Patients who were admitted to hospital

with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI),

non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and

unstable angina pectoris (USAP) were selected using appropriate

ICD codes in the computerised hospital data system. After the

exclusion of patients below 80 years, the remaining 156 patients

were involved in the final analyses.

This study was in compliance with the principles outlined in

the Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by the local ethics

committee.

STEMI was defined by characteristic symptoms of myocardial

ischaemia in association with persistent electrocardiographic

ST elevation and the subsequent release of biomarkers of

myocardial necrosis. Diagnostic ST elevation in the absence of

left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy or left bundle branch block

is defined by the European Society of Cardiology/American

Heart Association/World Heart Federation Task Force as is the

Cardiology Department, Pamukkale University Hospitals,

Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey

Samet Yilmaz, MD,

sametyilmazmd@gmail.com

Mehmet Koray Adali, MD

Oguz Kilic, MD

Yalın Tolga Yaylali, MD

Public Health Department, Pamukkale University,

Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey

Aysen Til, MD