CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 26, No 6, November/December 2015
248
AFRICA
In this study, although Mg
2+
did not worsen the haemodynamic
parameters, it did not reverse the ISO-induced left ventricular
hypotension or the decrease in ventricular dP/dt min. The
physiological significance of the decrease in the systolic duration
in ISO and Mg
2+
co-treated rats is unclear, but given that the
heart rate was unchanged, it is unlikely to be of major impact. By
contrast, in an ISO-induced cardiac dysfunction model in dogs,
Mg
2+
preserved ventricular activity and the effect was proposed
to be due to Mg
2+
-mediated reduction in cardiac afterload.
19
In
human heart MI, unrelated to ISO, the preservation of ventricular
function by Mg
2+
has been attributed to the direct action of
increased extracellular Mg
2+
due to MI-induced efflux of Mg
2+
.
44
It has previously been reported that the action of ISO on
the myocardium involves the production of reactive oxygen
species,
27,28
and that Mg
2+
acts as an antioxidant and reduces the
infarct size by protecting against free radicals.
16
In our study,
neither ISO nor Mg
2+
administration resulted in any significant
changes in the concentration of oxidative stress markers (CD
and TBARS) in the circulation after 24 hours.
After ischaemic damage to myocardial tissue, the blood will
reflect the appearance of specific cardiac markers as well as relatively
non-specific markers such as those attributable to lipid peroxidation.
The latter products, for example CD, lipid hydroperoxides and
TBARS depend not only on oxidative stress, but also on the nature
of the lipid substrate. Lipid peroxidation products generally change
in concert, and therefore using two of the three commonly used
markers should reveal the trend. These changes have been reported
up to eight days in ISO-induced MI,
45
and therefore the 24-hour
interval in our study could be expected to be appropriate.
Although infarcts were clearly demonstrated in our study, they
did not affect the lipid peroxidation markers, suggesting that the
infarct size was either too small to produce detectable markers
in the plasma, or the lipid substrate was not very susceptible to
oxidative stress. By contrast, in coronary artery ligation-induced
infarction in dogs, the markers of lipid peroxidation reached
peak concentrations a few hours after the ligation.
46
In rats
injected with ISO at a higher dose (110 mg/kg ip, once daily for
two days), Anandan
et al
.
47
found significant increases in the
concentration of TBARS in homogenised heart tissue.
With ISO being a broad-acting catecholamine, it is not
unexpected for it to produce systemic effects such as the loss of
body weight seen in this study. The ISO-related weight loss was
previously attributed to the stress of myocardial necrosis or to
the catabolic state of altered protein metabolism.
48
The increase
in heart weight:body weight ratio with ISO may indicate the
onset of cardiac hypertrophy
49
or oedema. The increase in heart
weight was unlikely to be an artifact related to loss of body weight
because the relative weights of the other organs were unaltered by
ISO treatment alone. The physiological relevance of the decreased
kidney weight in ISO and Mg
2+
co-treated rats is unclear.
Conclusion
Our results suggest a lack of reduction in infarct size by single-dose
Mg
2+
, despite the presumed optimal pre-treatment. In future studies,
it would be important to evaluate serum, heart tissue or urine Mg
2+
levels to better understand the temporal effects, and to use repeated
doses of Mg
2+
for more sustained prophylaxis. Although Mg
2+
did
not have adverse cardiovascular effects, the role and indications for
Mg
2+
therapy in MI still require further clarification.
CG was supported by the Oppenheimer Memorial Trust grant and UCT
Masters Research Scholarship, RK-L by the UCT URC/Carnegie Research
Development grant, the South African Heart Association grant and the UCT
Health Sciences Faculty Research Committee, and AG by the UCT URC/
Carnegie Research Development grant, National Research Foundation (NRF
Grant No 91514) and ADInstruments (Australia) grant. We thank Prof
Edward Johns for providing the Mikrotip catheter, Dr Kishor Bugarith for
insightful discussions, and Mr Henri Carrara for statistical advice.
References
1.
James MFM
.
Magnesium: an emerging drug in anaesthesia.
Br J
Anaesth
2009;
103
: 465–467. PMID:19749114.
2.
Horner SM
.
Efficacy of intravenous magnesium in acute myocar-
dial infarction in reducing arrhythmias and mortality. Meta-analysis
of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation
1992;
86
:
774–779. PMID:1387591.
3.
Woods KL, Fletcher S, Roffe C, Haider Y
.
Intravenous magnesium
sulphate in suspected acute myocardial infarction: results of the second
Leicester Intravenous Magnesium Intervention Trial (LIMIT-2).
Lancet
1992;
339
: 1553–1558. PMID:1351547.
4.
Shechter M, Hod H, Chouraqui P, Kaplinsky E, Rabinowitz B
.
Magnesium therapy in acute myocardial infarction when patients
are not candidates for thrombolytic therapy.
Am J Cardiol
1995;
75
:
321–323. PMID:7856520.
5.
Collins R, Peto R, Flather M, Parish S, Sleight P, Conway M
, et al.
ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril,
oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050
patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth
International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative.
Lancet
1995;
345
:
669–685. PMID:7661937.
6.
MAGIC
.
Early administration of intravenous magnesium to high-
risk patients with acute myocardial infarction in the Magnesium in
Coronaries (MAGIC) Trial: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet
2002;
360
: 1189–1196. PMID:12401244.
7.
Barros LF, Chagas AC, da Luz PL, Pileggi F
.
Magnesium treatment of
acute myocardial infarction: effects on necrosis in an occlusion/reperfu-
sion dog model.
Int J Cardiol
1995;
48
: 3–9. PMID:7744535.
8.
Christensen CW, Rieder MA, Silverstein EL, Gencheff NE
.
Magnesium
sulfate reduces myocardial infarct size when administered before but
not after coronary reperfusion in a canine model.
Circulation
1995;
92
:
2617–2621. PMID:7586364.
9.
Herzog WR, Schlossberg ML, MacMurdy KS, Edenbaum LR, Gerber
MJ, Vogel RA
, et al.
Timing of magnesium therapy affects experimental
infarct size.
Circulation
1995;
92
: 2622–2626. PMID:7586365.
10. Leor J, Kloner RA
.
An experimental model examining the role of
magnesium in the therapy of acute myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol
1995;
75
: 1292–1293. PMID:7778564.
11. Matsusaka T, Hasebe N, Jin YT, Kawabe J, Kikuchi K
.
Magnesium
reduces myocardial infarct size via enhancement of adenosine mecha-
nism in rabbits.
Cardiovasc Res
2002;
54
: 568–575. PMID:12031702.
12. Du C-S
.
Magnesium lithospermate B protects cardiomyocytes from
ischemic injury via inhibition of TAB1-p38 apoptosis signaling.
Front
Pharmacol
2010;
1
: 111. PMID:21607062.
13. Kingma JG, Qiu Y, Hearse DJ
.
Influence of low-flow infusion
and magnesium on tissue necrosis during regional ischemia in the
canine myocardium.
Can J Physiol. Pharmacol
1992;
70
: 1004–1010.
PMID:1451022.
14. Schlack W, Bier F, Schäfer M, Uebing A, Schäfer S, Borchard U
, et al.
Intracoronary magnesium is not protective against acute reperfusion