Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  56 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 28, No 2, March/April 2017

122

AFRICA

In this study, we tried to determine whether proximal

anastomosis performed on the ascending aorta in patients who

had undergone CPB and isolated CABG surgery had any effect

on the mean increase in aortic diameter during the early and

mid-term postoperative period. Arteriotomy on dilated aortae

for proximal anastomosis of saphenous vein grafts to the aorta

leads to disruption of the elastic structure and connective tissue

integrity of the aorta. How this affects the dilatation of the aorta

is unknown. This study aimed at answering that question.

In our study, we found that annual increases in all segments

of the aorta were statistically significantly different in both

groups. In patients who had undergone proximal anastomosis

of the ascending aorta, increases in the diameter of the

sinotubular junction and ascending aorta at one and three years

postoperatively were significantly greater than in patients who

had not undergone a proximal anastomosis. We believe that

this strengthens our hypothesis, which asserted that surgical

manipulation on a dilated ascending aorta increases the speed

of aortic expansion.

An aortic diameter exceeding normal limits, based on the

patient’s age and body surface area, is termed aortic dilatation,

and if it increases more than 50% of normal, it is termed aortic

aneurysm.

4

Aneurysm of the ascending aorta is a frequently

seen clinical condition. Haemodynamic force, degradation of

the configured extracellular matrix, familial predisposition and

transmural inflammation have been demonstrated as aetiological

factors for this disease.

5

Aortic wall strain acts in direct proportion with aortic

diameter and pressure, while it is in inverse proportion with aortic

wall thickness, in compliance with Laplace’s law [wall strain

=

pressure

×

radius (r)/2

×

wall thickness (h)].

6

The wall of the

enlarged aorta has a risk of rupture. Recent studies have reported

that aneurysms with a diameter less than 50 mm have a 2%

annual risk of rupture.

6

However, as reported in various studies,

for aneurysms with a diameter of 60 mm, annual risk of rupture

and mortality increases up to 11.8 and 6.9%, respectively. The

probability of their combined risk has been reported at 14.1%.

7

In patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta who

will undergo valvular surgery, dilatations of less than 50 cm,

unexplained dilatations of

55 mm, patients with Marfan

syndrome and bicuspid aortic dilatations of

50 mm, and for

smaller dilatations with an annual growth rate of 10 mm, surgery

is recommended.

8

In our patients, the aortic diameter was 40–45

mm (mean 41.5

±

1.4 mm) without any connective tissue disease

as aetiological factor, so we did not consider any indication for

surgery in our patients.

Postoperative dilatation rate is important because of the

risks of dilatation and rupture. Expansion rate of the ascending

aorta with a diameter of 40 mm following aortic valve surgery

has been reported as 0.5–2.4 mm/year (mean 0.45 mm/year).

9,10

However Andrus

et al

. found an expansion rate after aortic valve

replacement (AVR) of –0.1 mm/year. This suggests that AVR

changes the natural course of aortic dilatation.

11

Keane

et al

. reported that ascending aortae of patients with

bicuspid valves are more frequently prone to dilatation.

9

In their

series of 14 cases, Yasuda

et al

. followed their patients for 10 years

and reported an annual aortic expansion rate of 0.08 mm/year.

In their studies using CT angiography and echocardiography for

evaluation, they indicated that an increase in the aortic diameter

of 0.2–0.3 mm within 10 years was not statistically significant.

In our study, postoperative (group 2) dilatation in cases with

tricuspid aortic valves had an annual dilatation rate of 1 mm/

year (Table 2). We believe that this dilatation rate was related to

risk factors independent of surgery and valvular pathology.

Natsuaki

et al

. reported that patients who underwent

mechanical valve implantation carried a higher risk of aortic

dissection and rupture when compared with those who

had received biological valves.

12

This contradicts the belief

that biological valves leave behind greater residual gradient

and undergo faster degeneration in sepsis and infection as

endocarditis. In our patients during the three years of follow up,

we did not observe aortic dissection and rapid development of

aneurysmatic dilatation (Fig. 1). However, cases with post-CABG

dissection have occasionally been reported in the literature.

13

Mortality rates in cases of surgery of the ascending aorta have

been reported to range between 1.7 and 17.1% and in re-operated

cases, between 6 and 32%.

14,15

The surgical procedures used and

aetiological factors are known determinants of mortality.

13

In their series, Atik

et al

. detected aortic dilatations in three

(17%) patients following coronary artery surgery.

14

Songur

et

al

. reported aortic dilatation in 50 cases within nine years of

cardiac surgery; eleven (22%) of these cases with aortic dilatation

developed after CABG. In these cases, average diameter of

the ascending aorta after the first and second operation was

indicated as 4.1 and 5.5 cm, respectively.

16

Aortic manipulation

(proximal anastomosis line, cannulation, suture lines, cross-

clamping injury) and aortic valve pathologies have been held

responsible for the development of these dilatations. No case–

control studies where aortic valves were evaluated following

proximal anastomosis have been performed.

In our cases, we detected a dilatation rate of 3.04mmover three

years (7.1%) at the level of the tubular segment of the ascending

aorta. In the patients who underwent proximal anastomosis,

aortic dilatation was more severe (median 3.7 mm per three

years; 8.7%) but the intergroup difference was not statistically

significantly different (

p

=

0.059). In the first postoperative year,

the intergroup difference was significantly different at the level

of the tubular aorta (

p

=

0.02). Dilatation of all segments of the

ascending aorta over time was statistically significantly different

in both groups (

p

=

0.001; Table 2). Intergroup difference in the

tubular ascending aorta in the first year could have been related

to the proximal anastomosis. However when the magnitude of

standard deviation and width of confidence intervals are taken

into consideration, a confounding effect of aetiological factors

(connective tissue disease) should not be overlooked (Fig. 1).

The causative effects of risk factors such as diabetes mellitus,

hypercholesterolaemia, age, hypertension, smoking and alcohol

abuse on atherosclerosis are well recognised.

17

Narrowings or

occlusions occur in the vasa vasorum of the atherosclerotic

aorta, which result in an increase in the levels of elastase enzyme,

a decrease in the levels of anti-protease enzyme and degradation

of the elastin. Consequently, aneurysmatic dilatations develop

on the weakened vascular wall.

18,19

Matsuyama

et al

. detected

a higher number of patients with PAD, TIA, stroke, current

and past smoking history and COPD among those who had

developed aortic dilatation following AVR.

20

However, they

reported a lower incidence of aortic dilatation in patients who

used beta-blockers and those with calcified aortae.

21

In our patients, the presence of COPD, smoking, stroke and

beta-blocker use did not differ between the groups (

p

>

0.05)