Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  62 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 62 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 2, March/April 2018

124

AFRICA

mtDNA damage has also been shown to promote

atherosclerosis directly, in the absence of oxidative stress. In a

study by Yu

et al

.,

36

VSMCs showed increased apoptosis and

decreased proliferation in a proof-reading deficient PolG

-/-

/

ApoE

-/-

mouse model. Increased secretion of pro-inflammatory

factors, tumour necrosis factor-

α

and interleukin-1

β

were also

reported and implicated in mtDNA release into the cytosol and

subsequent activation of the inflammasome.

The authors went on to test the applicability of their findings

in humans and concluded that an alternative mechanism

for mtDNA defects mediate atherosclerosis development,

independent of ROS; mtDNA defects lead to aberrant ECT

function and consequently reduce ATP content in VSMCs,

which then promote apoptosis and inhibit cell proliferation,

leading to increased atherosclerosis and risk of plaque rupture.

36,37

Plaque vulnerability is further promoted by mtDNA defects

via monocyte cell death and the resultant increased release of

inflammatory cytokine.

38

From these studies, it can be seen

that mitochondrial dysfunction, possibly as a result of mtDNA

variants or damage, can directly be implicated in mechanisms

that encumber vascular health.

mtDNA point mutations and cardiac involvement

Clinically proven mtDNA mutations are also an important cause

of inherited disease.

39

To date, more than 250 deleterious point

mutations and deletions of the mitochondrial genome have been

clinically proven to be associated with certain disease phenotypes

(www.mitomap.org)

. In several of these diseases, cardiovascular

symptoms are an important part of the aetiology.

Due to the very high levels of mtDNA population

variation seen, both within and between human populations,

the identification of mutations causing clinically manifesting

disease proves to be a challenge, despite the small size of the

mitochondrial chromosome. Initially, DiMauro and Schon had

set specific criteria for defining the pathogenicity of mtDNA

mutations.

40

The list has subsequently been updated to include

important methods such as functional testing and single-

fibre analysis, which can more specifically link genotype to

phenotype.

41,42

Notably, a pathogenicity scoring system for mitochondrial

tRNAs was devised by McFarland

et al

.

41

and further refined

by Yarham

et al

.

43

Mitchell

et al

.

44

also devised a pathogenicity

scoring system using variants in complex I mtDNA genes, but

this can be applied to any structural mtDNA mutation. A list of

these criteria is given in Table 1.

It should be noted that there are mtDNA mutations that are

exceptions to all the ‘rules’ in Table 1, and this was a critical

motivation for algorithms or clinical scoring systems to help

weigh the evidence that is presented for each mutation.

43,44

For a

clinically proven mutation to manifest as a diseased phenotype,

as in the case of primary mitochondrial disorders, the allele

frequency (heteroplasmy) needs to exceed a certain threshold,

usually above 60%, referred to as the phenotypical threshold

effect.

45

The biochemical threshold effect then refers to the ability of

the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system to resist the

metabolic expression of deficiencies therein.

45,46

These deficiencies

may be caused by various factors involved in the expression and

regulation of the OXHPOS complexes.

There are many complexities to the expression of mtDNA

mutations; a classic example is the mitochondrial tRNAmutation

m.3243A

>

G, the most common of the mtDNA mutations

causing mitochondrial disease. The m.3243A

>

G mutation can

result in a vast array of clinical phenotypes affecting multiple

systems within the body, causing two distinct clinical syndromes:

maternally inherited diabetes and deafness (MIDD), and

mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-

like episode (MELAS) syndrome in severe cases. Furthermore,

the age of onset of m.3243A

>

G-associated phenotypes spans

more than 50 years. The impact of several confounding factors,

including heteroplasmy levels, remains unclear.

47

Another group of well-studied mutations are those that

cause the disease Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON).

In contrast to the m.3243A

>

G mutation, LHON has a tissue-

specific phenotype manifesting as bi-lateral blindness. Several

mtDNA mutations have been implicated in LHON, while

three of these mutations, namely m.3460G

>

A, m.11778G

>

A

and m.14484T

>

C located in subunits ND1, ND4 and ND6

of complex I, respectively, account for 90 to 95% of cases.

48

Unusually, these mutations can be detected as homoplasmic

variants without exerting a phenotype. Rather, disease penetrance

is significantly influenced by confounding factors such as

gender and environment (clinical penetrance is increased to

93% in smoking men),

49

and mtDNA haplogroup background

(haplogroup J, K and M7 increase risk of clinical penetrance).

50,51

The heart has especially high energy needs and relies heavily

on OXPHOS-derived ATP, such that one-third of cardiomyocyte

volume consists of mitochondria.

52

Not surprisingly then, the

myocardium is frequently affected in primary mitochondrial

disorders.

53

In a retrospective review study by Yaplito-Lee

et al

.,

54

33% of paediatric patients with definitive OXPHOS

disorders had cardiac manifestations. Several mtDNA mutations

(Fig. 3, Table 2 [online]) have also been shown to exhibit cardiac

involvement, either as part of a multi-system syndrome (most

frequently seen in MELAS), or as isolated occurrences, such as

in the absence of associated CVDs or risk factors thereof.

53,55,56

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (hCM) and pulmonary artery

hypertension (PAH) are the two phenotypes most commonly

seen as isolated cardiac manifestations of primary mitochondrial

Table 1. Criteria for defining the pathogenicity of mtDNA mutations

Criteria for pathogenicity of mtDNA mutations include

• The mutation must be present only in patients and not in controls

• The mutation must be present in varied mitochondrial genetic backgrounds

• The mutation must be the best mtDNA candidate variant to be pathogenic

• The mutation must affect functionally important domains

• Transfer of the mutated mtDNA to another cell line must be accompanied

by transfer of the cellular or molecular defect

• The mutation must not be a recognised, non-pathogenic, single-nucleotide

polymorphism

• The mutation must alter an area that is known to be highly conserved

throughout evolution

• The mutation must occur at varying levels within the cells (i.e. must be

heteroplasmic)

• A larger proportion of mutant mtDNA must correspond to a more severe

phenotype

• Single-fibre polymerase chain reaction must be performed by comparing

normal and abnormal fibres from muscle

• The secondary structure of the tRNA molecule must also be taken into

account when determining mt-tRNA mutation pathogenicity

These criteria need to be met in order for a mtDNA mutation to be classified as

‘disease causing’ for either structural or mt-tRNA mutations.

40-43