Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  65 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 65 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 29, No 2, March/April 2018

AFRICA

127

be adjusted to reflect the position within the phylogeny, since

there are large differences in the average number of common

population variants between haplogroups. This approach can

also further be modified to, for example, exclude low-impact

variants, highlighting the role of likely deleterious functional

variants.

Determining the likely impact or pathogenicity of mtDNA

variants can be achieved by using several computational

pathogenicity-predicting methods.

128

An example of such a

method is the MutPred system, which assigns a MutPred score

to any protein-coding mtDNA variant, according to 14 gain/

loss properties of protein structure and function.

129

The use of

this system has been widely validated in the context of mtDNA

studies,

124

and performs better in an accuracy test when compared

with several other methods.

128

Therefore the question can be

asked whether individuals in the disease group are impacted on

by a combination of rare (mildly deleterious) variants or simply

whether such variants are more common in the disease cohort

than in the controls.

The mutational load approach moves away from the study

of haplogroups and looks at the collective effect of rare (or

recent) variants, which are more likely to be deleterious. It distils

the likely impact of a person’s mtDNA variation into a single

value on a continuous scale rather than a letter. Consequently it

will have more statistical power than conventional haplogroup-

association studies, as more powerful parametric statistics can

be applied and fewer comparisons are required.

130

It offers an

alternative method to explore the involvement of mtDNA

variants in disease phenotypes, including diseases thought to be

related to mitochondrial dysfunction, such as CVDs.

The unique challenges faced by studies in

African populations

While communicable diseases are still the leading causes of

mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), CVD particularly is a

growing concern here, since the prevalence has risen markedly

in recent times as more populations of developing countries

become urbanised and are exposed to a diet and lifestyle that

increase risk factors for CVD.

131

Taking into account the many

differences among ethnic groups in the onset and development

of CVD,

132,133

genomic investigations have also been used to

investigate these disparities.

131,134-136

However, the number of

well-powered genetic studies on CVDs in African populations

or people of African descent is much lower than in European

populations. As yet, no conclusive nDNA genetic factor/s has

been identified to help understand these disparities.

137

Current Eurocentric reference panels used in GWAS studies

to examine the involvement of population variants in disease

have been shown to be of limited use in even common SSA

population groups.

138

This is indicative of the lack of African

representation in our current databases. This lack extends to

mtDNA as well. Of the more than 30 000 mtDNA sequences

available on GenBank, only 13% of these are of African lineages

(L0–6). This bias in published data results in the resolution of the

phylogenetic tree being much higher in the European branches

(especially super-haplogroup N descendant) than in the African

roots,

139

despite greater diversity within the latter. Comparatively

few studies have been done where the involvement of mtDNA

variation in CVD has been considered.

135,136,140-142

Although of small size, one such study helps to highlight the

challenges posed by these gaps in our current data. Ameh

et

al

.

142

could not find the tRNA mutation m.3243A

>

G in Nigerian

type 2 diabetes patients, despite an association being previously

reported in other European and Asian populations. This and

other studies

143

illustrate the difficulty of extrapolating genetic

risk factors for disease from one population group to the next,

and the need for population-specific studies.

Conclusion

SSA is facing a growing burden of CVD, while the discrepancies

in onset and progression between different ethnicities are still

poorly understood. Additionally, there are large data gaps

when genetic studies on Africans are considered, especially for

complex disease phenotypes. The unique genetic backgrounds

of different populations also make it difficult to apply advances

made in well-studied populations to understudied populations.

While great efforts are being made to address these data gaps

by initiatives such as the Human Heredity and Health in Africa

(H3Africa) initiative,

131

the Southern African Human Genome

Programme, and the African Genome Variation Project,

138

there

is an urgent need for even more large-scale African-specific

investigations (which should also consider mtDNA variation)

to be undertaken if we are to provide the necessary care to all

vulnerable groups.

144

Realistically, for some time still, it is likely that studies

in African populations will be hampered by financial and

logistic/infrastructural difficulties,

144

limiting the sizes thereof.

Fortunately, these studies can benefit from retrospective lessons

we have learned thus far in other populations, highlighted in

the above discussions. New studies could particularly benefit

by asking better-formulated questions, and using alternative

approaches that aim to address the challenges associated with

many of the classic approaches used, when the role of mtDNA

in common disease is investigated.

References

1.

Mensah GA. Descriptive epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors

and diabetes in Africa.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis

2013;

56

: 240–250. http://

dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2013.10.014.

2.

McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, Stewart A, Roberts R, Cox

DR,

et al

. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coro-

nary heart disease.

Science

2007;

316

(5830): 1488–1491. doi:10.1126/

science.1142447.

3.

MatarínM, BrownW, Scholz S, Simón-Sánchez J, Fung H-C, Hernandez

D,

et al

. A genome-wide genotyping study in patients with ischaemic

stroke: initial analysis and data release.

Lancet Neurol

2007;

6

: 414–420.

doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70081-9.

4.

Den Hoed M, Strawbridge RJ, Almgren P, Gustafsson S, Axelsson T,

Engström G,

et al

. GWAS-identified loci for coronary heart disease

are associated with intima-media thickness and plaque presence at the

carotid artery bulb.

Atherosclerosis

2015;

239

: 304–310.

http://dx.doi.

org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.032.

5.

Chen X, Kuja-Halkola R, Rahman I, Arpegärd J, Viktorin A, Karlsson

R,

et al

. Dominant genetic variation and missing heritability for human

complex traits: insights from twin versus genome-wide common SNP

models.

Am J Hum Genet

2015;

97

: 708–714.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.

ajhg.2015.10.004.