Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 2, March/April 2020

72

AFRICA

aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase

>

150 IU/l), renal

failure (creatinine

>

200

µ

mol/l), or history of seizure, and stroke.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups using sealed,

opaque assignment envelopes as follows: the sevoflurane group,

a sevoflurane-based anaesthetic regimen, and the propofol

group, a propofol-based anaesthetic regimen. In both groups,

anaesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and

sufentanil (1

µ

g/kg). Anaesthesia was maintained with sufentanil

(1

µ

g/kg/h) combined with a continuous intravenous infusion of

propofol (6–10 mg/kg/h) in the propofol group, or with 1–3%

sevoflurane in the sevoflurane group, based on bispectral index

monitoring (maintained at 40–60).

Tracheal intubation was facilitated by administration of

0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium besylate. After endotracheal

intubation, patients were mechanically ventilated on a volume-

controlled mode with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO

2

) of

0.5, inspiratory:expiratory ratio (I:E) of 1:2, extrinsic positive

end-expiratory pressure (PEEP

e

) of 0 cm H

2

O, frequency of

10–12 breaths/min and tidal volume (TV) of 8 ml/kg. To

keep arterial blood gases within the physiological range, the

respiratory rate (RR) was adjusted with the guidance of end-tidal

CO

2

monitoring and intermittent arterial blood gas analyses.

Standard CPB was established with aortic and both vena

caval cannulations. The priming solution contained Ringer’s

lactate solution, 6% HAES–steril (130/0.4), sodium bicarbonate,

mannitol and heparin with a target of 24–25% haematocrit.

9

During CPB, systemic hypothermia of 28–30°C and a pump

flow of 2.4–2.5 l/min/m

2

were applied. Patients were transferred

to ICU after surgery.

Haemodynamics and respiratory mechanics were recorded

at baseline, before CPB, at 15 min after declamping, and at five,

30 and 60 min after cessation of CPB. The partial pressure of

oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO

2

/FiO

2

) was calculated

and recorded at baseline, 15 min after declamping, and at five,

30 and 60 min after cessation of CPB.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean

±

SD. Data of haemodynamics,

respiratory mechanics and PaO

2

/FiO

2

were analysed using

repeated-measures ANOVA. Differences in clinical characteristics

and parameters at each time point between the groups were

analysed by the independent samples

t

-test for continuous

variables or chi-squared test for categorical variables. Statistical

analysis was performed with the SPSS software package (version

18; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Significance was assumed at

p

<

0.05.

Results

Patient clinical and demographic characteristics, and pre- and

intra-operative features are listed in Table 1. Forty-two patients

were enrolled in the study, with 21 in each group. The sevoflurane

group included 15 males and six females weighing 54.5

±

1.4 kg,

with a mean age of 44.6

±

2.0 years, and the propofol group

comprised 14 males and seven females weighing 54.9

±

2.4 kg,

with a mean age of 45.0

±

2.7 years (

p

=

0.739, 0.859 and 0.909,

respectively, by chi-squared test and independent samples

t

-test).

With regard to NYHA classification, there were five class II

patients in the sevoflurane group and four in the propofol group,

and 16 class III patients in the sevoflurane group and 17 in

the propofol group (

p

=

0.707 by chi-squared test). The intra-

operative characteristics such as CPB time and time of cross-

clamping were not different between the two groups (

p

=

0.433

and 0.340, respectively, by independent samples

t

-test).

Changes in haemodynamic variables are shown in Table 2.

There were no differences in heart rate (73

±

24 vs 73

±

19 beats/

min,

p

=

0.962 by independent samples

t

-test), mean arterial

pressure (71

±

12 vs 75

±

9 mmHg,

p

=

0.258 by independent

samples

t

-test) and central venous pressure (CVP) (6.4

±

6.1

vs 5.0

±

3.9 mmHg,

p

=

0.485 by independent samples

t

-test)

between the sevoflurane and propofol groups at baseline. These

haemodynamic variables were similar in both groups before

CPB, at 15 min after declamping, and five, 30 and 60 min

post-CPB (

p

=

0.787, 0.179, and 0.720, respectively, by repeated-

measures ANOVA).

Changes in respiratory mechanics are shown in Table 3. At

Table 1. Demographic, pre- and intra-operative data of the patients

Variables

S group

(n

=

21

)

P group

(n

=

21

) p-

value

Age (years)

44.6

±

9.2

45.0

±

10.4

0.909

Gender (M/F)

15/6

14/7

0.739

Weight (kg)

54.5

±

6.4

54.9

±

9.1

0.859

NYHA classification (

n

)

Class II

5

4

0.707

Class III

16

17

CPB time (min)

106

±

28

97

±

33

0.433

Time of cross-clamping (min)

63

±

21

58

±

26

0.340

Data are presented as mean

±

standard deviation or number as appropriate.

S: sevoflurane; P: propfol; NYHA: New York Heart Association; CPB: cardio-

pulmonary bypass.

Table 3. Mechanical variables of the study groups

Variables

Baseline Pre-CPB

15 min

after

declamping

5 min

post-CPB

30 min

post-CPB

60 min

post-CPB

PIP, cm H

2

O

Sevoflurane

Propofol

16.6

±

3.3

16.3

±

2.7

16.9

±

3.0

16.6

±

2.1

18.9

±

4.2

16.8

±

2.2

17.0

±

3.8

16.0

±

2.6

16.0

±

2.9

15.5

±

2.1

17.0

±

2.7

16.5

±

1.9

mPaw, cm H

2

O

Sevoflurane

Propofol

6.2

±

1.3

5.8

±

0.7

6.2

±

1.0

5.8

±

0.5

6.5

±

0.8

6.3

±

0.7

6.4

±

1.2

5.9

±

0.8

5.7

±

1.7

5.6

±

0.5

6.4

±

1.6

5.8

±

0.7

iPEEP, cm H

2

O

Sevoflurane

Propofol

2.7

±

0.9

2.5

±

0.5

2.6

±

1.0

2.6

±

0.5

2.9

±

0.9

2.8

±

0.5

3.0

±

0.9

2.5

±

0.5

3.0

±

0.9

2.5

±

0.5

3.1

±

1.0

2.6

±

0.5

DLC, ml/cm H

2

O

Sevoflurane

Propofol

39.6

±

6.6

41.0

±

7.9

39.1

±

4.9

41.7

±

6.3

33.6

±

7.4

41.6

±

5.4

40.3

±

6.0

41.4

±

5.8

41.4

±

4.7

41.2

±

7.3

37.7

±

6.3

38.3

±

6.9

Data are presented as mean

±

standard deviation. TV: tidal volume; PIP: peak inspira-

tory pressure; mPaw: mean airway pressure; iPEEP: intrinsic positive end-expiratory

pressure; DLC: dynamic lung compliance.

Table 2. Haemodynamic variables of the study groups

Variables

Baseline Pre-CPB

15 min

after

declamp-

ing

5 min

post-CPB

30 min

post-CPB

60 min

post-CPB

HR, beats/min

Sevoflurane

Propofol

73

±

24

73

±

19

88

±

20

93

±

17

93

±

20

98

±

16

94

±

19

101

±

7

92

±

17

86

±

13

87

±

15

85

±

15

MAP, mmHg

Sevoflurane

Propofol

71

±

12

75

±

9

62

±

9

58

±

10

56

±

5

60

±

8

63

±

5

64

±

10

66

±

8

69

±

6

68

±

8

74

±

6

CVP, mmHg

Sevoflurane

Propofol

6.4

±

6.1

5.0

±

3.9

6.6

±

4.3

6.2

±

3.2

5.2

±

5.0

6.2

±

3.9

10.2

±

3.1

8.7

±

4.0

10.1

±

2.9

9.5

±

4.0

9.4

±

2.2

10.6

±

3.6

Data are presented as mean

±

standard deviation. HR: heart rate; MAP: mean

arterial pressure; CVP: central venous pressure; CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass.