Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 31, No 2, March/April 2020

AFRICA

97

lipid abnormalities or the metabolic syndrome

per se

), neither

of which showed strong independent correlations with eGFR.

In addition, these effects were independent of BP. These data

therefore support a view that the adverse renal effects of insulin

resistance are distinct from that of obesity, associated metabolic

features or the metabolic syndrome

per se

, and that the impact is

at least as strong as that of modifiable conventional risk factors

(BP).

Importantly, in combination with circulating resistin

concentrations, the impact of insulin resistance is markedly

stronger than the combined impact of modifiable conventional

risk factors. Consequently, targeting conventional risk factors

alone, including obesity and associated metabolic abnormalities,

may result in a marked residual impact on the development of

CKD in communities with a high prevalence of obesity. As the

relationships between insulin resistance and eGFR in the present

study cannot be accounted for by obesity or associated metabolic

features, further studies are urgently required to identify the

origins of the insulin resistance beyond obesity in the South

African context.

There is also evidence to support a role for adipocytokines

(obesity-associated inflammatory changes) in the development

and progression of CKD.

18,21,25,26,28,29

Animal-based studies

similarly suggest a distinct action of inflammatory substances in

contributing to these effects.

31,32

However, clinical data are again

unclear as to the relative impact of adipocytokines compared

to that of conventional risk factors on renal function. While

a number of prior studies have demonstrated relationships

between circulating concentrations of adipocytokines and

CKD,

18,21,25,26,28,29

whether these relationships are stronger in the

100

95

90

85

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

* **

(126) (124) (119) (126) (125) (120) (120) (124)

(n =)

Octiles of log resistin

Multivariate adjusted eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m

2

)

**

***

##

$

100

95

90

85

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

* *

(123) (121) (123) (120) (121) (125) (125) (126)

(n =)

Octiles of log HOMA–IR

Multivariate adjusted eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m

2

)

*

***

###

$

#

&

||

105

100

95

90

85

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

* ** **

(106) (122) (138) (106) (101) (159) (120) (132)

(n =)

Octiles of SBP

Multivariate adjusted eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m

2

)

*

*

**

***

Fig. 4.

Multivariate adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) across octiles of the homeostasis model of insulin resist-

ance (HOMA-IR) or plasma resistin concentrations compared to systolic blood pressure in a community sample (

n

=

984).

Adjustments are for age, gender, waist circumference, conventional systolic blood pressure (for HOMA-IR and resistin),

regular tobacco use, regular alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, HbA

1c

and the metabolic syndrome. SBP, systolic blood

pressure. *

p

<

0.05, **

p

<

0.005, ***

p

<

0.0001 vs octile 1,

p

<

0.05,

††

p

<

0.0001 versus octile 2,

p

<

0.05,

‡‡

p

<

0.0001 versus

octile 3,

#

p

<

0.05,

##

p

<

0.005,

###

p

<

0.0001 versus octile 4,

$

p

<

0.05 versus octile 5,

&

p

<

0.05 versus octile 6,

p

<

0.05

versus octile 7.