Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  41 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 27, No 2, March/April 2016

AFRICA

95

Diagnosing cardiac disease during pregnancy:

imaging modalities

Ntobeko AB Ntusi, Petronella Samuels, Sulaiman Moosa, Ana O Mocumbi

Abstract

Pregnant women with known or suspected cardiovascular

disease (CVD) often require cardiovascular imaging during

pregnancy. The accepted maximum limit of ionising radiation

exposure to the foetus during pregnancy is a cumulative dose

of 5 rad. Concerns related to imaging modalities that involve

ionising radiation include teratogenesis, mutagenesis and

childhood malignancy. Importantly, no single imaging study

approaches this cautionary dose of 5 rad (50 mSv or 50 mGy).

Diagnostic imaging procedures that may be used in pregnancy

include chest radiography, fluoroscopy, echocardiography,

invasive angiography, cardiovascular computed tomography,

computed tomographic pulmonary angiography, cardiovascu-

lar magnetic resonance (CMR) and nuclear techniques.

Echocardiography and CMR appear to be completely safe

in pregnancy and are not associated with any adverse foetal

effects, provided there are no general contra-indications to MR

imaging. Concerns related to safety of imaging tests must be

balanced against the importance of accurate diagnosis and

thorough assessment of the pathological condition. Decisions

about imaging in pregnancy are premised on understanding

the physiology of pregnancy, understanding basic concepts of

ionising radiation, the clinical manifestations of existent CVD in

pregnancy and features of new CVD. The cardiologist/physician

must understand the indications for and limitations of, and the

potential harmful effects of each test during pregnancy. Current

evidence suggests that a single cardiovascular radiological study

during pregnancy is safe and should be undertaken at all times

when clinically justified. In this article, the different imaging

modalities are reviewed in terms of how they work, how safe

they are and what their clinical utility in pregnancy is. Further-

more, the safety of contrast agents in pregnancy is also reviewed.

Keywords:

medical imaging, pregnancy, cardiovascular disease,

X-ray, echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular

magnetic resonance, nuclear cardiology

Submitted 3/9/15, accepted 4/3/16

Cardiovasc J Afr

2016;

27

: 95–103

www.cvja.co.za

DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-022

Pregnant women with known cardiovascular disease (CVD)

or a newly diagnosed cardiac condition in pregnancy often

require cardiovascular imaging during the pregnancy to confirm

the diagnosis, to assess disease severity and stratify risk, to

prognosticate, to plan for appropriate management and to assess

response to therapy (Table 1). A variety of cardiovascular imaging

modalities are available for such purposes and include X-ray

[which encompasses chest radiography, cardiovascular computed

tomography (CCT), computed tomographic pulmonary angio-

graphy (CTPA), coronary computed tomographic angio-

graphy (CCTA), fluoroscopy and invasive angiography],

echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)

and nuclear techniques.

Of these, diagnostic X-ray and nuclear procedures emerge as

the greatest source of concern for patients and clinicians alike.

However, most diagnostic radiological procedures do not expose

the pregnant woman to a degree of radiation that would threaten

the well-being of the developing pre-embryo, embryo or foetus.

1

Furthermore, as cardiological imaging focuses mainly on the chest,

there is minimal direct exposure of the lower abdomen, where the

baby may lie within the main X-ray beam; hence radiation doses

to the developing foetus tend to be small.

2

The mechanisms

of action, safety and clinical utility of various cardiovascular

imaging modalities in pregnancy are considered below.

We performed a systematic search of the published literature

on cardiovascular imaging in pregnancy, published in the English

language, through PUBMED (January 1966 to December 2015),

OVID, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and hand

search of reference lists from selected articles. All search engines

were searched using the key words: ‘pregnancy’, ‘cardiovascular

imaging’, ‘echocardiography’, ‘X-ray’, ‘angiography’,

‘fluoroscopy’, ‘computerised tomography’, ‘cardiovascular

magnetic resonance’ and ‘nuclear cardiology’. Articles with

important insights about cardiovascular imaging in pregnancy

are included.

Ionising radiation and pregnancy

Ionising radiation refers to electromagnetic radiation produced

by X-ray equipment, the radioactive isotopes (radionuclides)

used for radiation therapy (Table 2). The accepted cumulative

dose of ionising radiation during pregnancy is 5 rad (which is

also equal to 50 mSv or 50 mGy),

3

and no single diagnostic study

exceeds this maximum. For example, the amount of exposure

to the foetus from a two-view chest X-ray of the mother is only

0.00007 rad.

4

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University

of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town,

South Africa

Ntobeko AB Ntusi, FCP (SA), DPhil,

ntobeko.ntusi@gmail.com

Cape University Body Imaging Centre, Faculty of Health

Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Petronella Samuels, BTech Rad

Military Hospital, Wynberg, Cape Town, South Africa

Sulaiman Moosa, FFRad Diag (SA)

Instituto Nacional de Saúde and Department of Medicine,

University Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique

Ana O Mocumbi, MD, PhD, FESC