Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  40 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 32, No 2, March/April 2021

94

AFRICA

Control

T-PKB

Minus GRT

Plus GRT

HFD + captopril

Groups

Effect of diet:

p

< 0.05

Ratio

CON 1-5

C+GRT 1-5

HFD 1-5

HFD+GRT1-5

Captoril 1-5

HFD

56 kDa

***

0.0

0.5

1.5

1.0

Minus GRT

Plus GRT

HFD + captopril

Groups

Control

HFD

Effect of diet:

p

< 0.05

Ratio

CON 1-5

C+GRT 1-5

HFD 1-5

HFD+GRT1-5

Captoril 1-5

56 kDa

*

*

*

**

0.0

0.5

1.5

1.0

P-PKB

Control

P:T PKB ratio

Minus GRT

Plus GRT

HFD + captopril

HFD

1.5

0.5

1.0

0.0

Groups

Ratio

Fig. 5.

PKB expression in the aortic rings of the HFD versus

control groups (GRT treated and untreated), including

the HFD animals treated with captopril. (A) T-PKB;

***

p

< 0.001, HFD versus control groups (

n

= 5 per

group). According to two-way ANOVA, the HFD had a

significant effect (

p

< 0.05) on T-PKB expression (

n

= 5

per group). (B) P-PKB; **

p

< 0.01, HFD versus control

groups; ***

p

< 0.001, HFD + captopril versus HFD

groups. According to two-way ANOVA, the HFD had a

significant effect (

p

< 0.01) on P-PKB levels (

n

= 5 per

group). (C) P:T PKB ratio; no significant differences

between the groups

A

B

Control

0.5

1.0

1.5

0.0

T-eNOS

CON 1-5

C+GRT 1-5

HFD 1-5

HFD+GRT1-5

Captoril 1-5

140 kDa

Minus GRT

Plus GRT

HFD + captopril

HFD

Groups

Effect of GRT:

p

< 0.001

Ratio

**

***

*

Control

P-eNOS

CON 1-5

C+GRT 1-5

HFD 1-5

HFD+GRT1-5

Captoril 1-5

140 kDa

Minus GRT extract

Plus GRT extract

HFD + captopril

HFD

0

1

2

3

4

5

Groups

Effect of diet:

p

< 0.001

Ratio

Control

P:T eNOS ratio

Minus GRT

Plus GRT

HFD + captopril

HFD

5

4

3

2

1

0

Groups

Effect of diet:

p

< 0.001

Ratio

***

*

Fig. 6.

eNOS expression in the aortic rings of the HFD versus

control groups (GRT treated and untreated), including

the HFD animals treated with captopril. (A) T-eNOS;

**

p

< 0.01, HFD + GRT versus HFD groups. According

to two-way ANOVA, the GRT had a significant effect (

p

< 0.01) on T-eNOS expression (

n

= 5 per group). (B)

P-eNOS; ***

p

< 0.001, HFD versus control groups; *

p

< 0.05, HFD + captopril versus HFD groups. According

to two-way ANOVA, the HFD had a significant effect (

p

< 0.001) on the P-eNOS levels (

n

= 5 per group). (C)

P:T eNOS; ***

p

< 0.001 HFD versus control groups;

HFD + captopril versus HFD groups. According to

two-way ANOVA, the HFD had a significant effect (

p

<

0.001) on P:T eNOS levels (

n

= 5 per group).

A

B

C

C