Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  43 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA • Volume 32, No 2, March/April 2021

AFRICA

97

39. Simonds SE, Pryor JT, Ravussin E, Greenway FL, Dileone R, Allen

AM,

et al.

Leptin mediates the increase in blood pressure associated

with obesity.

Cell

2014;

159

(6): 1404–1416.

40. Bełtowski J. Leptin and the regulation of endothelial function in physi-

ological and pathological conditions.

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol

2012;

39

(2): 168–178.

41. Canda BD, Oguntibeju OO, Marnewick JL. Effects of consumption of

rooibos (

Aspalathus linearis

) and a rooibos-derived commercial supple-

ment on hepatic tissue injury by tert-butyl hydroperoxide in Wistar rats.

Oxid Med Cell Longev

2014;

2014

: 716832.

42. Persson IA-L, Josefsson M, Andersson RGG. Tea flavanols inhibit angi-

otensin-converting enzyme activity and increase nitric oxide production

in human endothelial cells.

J Pharm Pharmacol

2006;

58

(8): 1139–1144.

43. Persson IAL. The pharmacological mechanism of angiotensin-convert-

ing enzyme inhibition by green tea, rooibos and enalaprilat – A study on

enzyme kinetics.

Phyther Res

2012;

26

(4): 517–521.

44. Johnson R, Shabalala S, Louw J, Kappo AP, Muller CJF. Aspalathin

reverts doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity through increased autophagy

and decreased expression of p53/mTOR/p62 signaling.

Molecules

2017;

22

(10): 863–871.

45. Odaka C, Mizuochu T. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor capto-

pril prevents activation-induced apoptosis by interfering with T cell

activation signals.

Clin Exp Immunol

2000;

121

(10009055): 515–522.

46. Sasaki M, Nishida N, Shimada M. A beneficial role of rooibos in

diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Molecules

2018;

23

(4): 839.

47. Wright EM, Loo DDF, Hirayama BA. Biology of human sodium

glucose transporters.

Physiol Rev

2011;

91

(2): 733–794.

48. Bonner C, Kerr-Conte J, Gmyr V, Queniat G, Moerman E, Thévenet J,

et al

. Inhibition of the glucose transporter SGLT2 with dapagliflozin in

pancreatic alpha cells triggers glucagon secretion.

Nat Med

2015;

21

(5):

512–517.

Sex differences in ‘normal’ blood pressure and associated CVD risk

Women have a lower ‘normal’ blood pressure range

compared to men and this is linked to risk for each specific

cardiovascular disease (CVD) type, including heart attack,

heart failure, and stroke, a large study from the Smidt Heart

Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre found.

Currently, established blood pressure guidelines state that

women and men have the same normal healthy range of

blood pressure. But this research shows there are differences

in normal blood pressure between the sexes.

‘Our latest findings suggest that this one-size-fits-all

approach to considering blood pressure may be detrimental

to a woman’s health,’ said Dr Susan Cheng, associate

professor of cardiology and director of the Institute for

Research on Healthy Aging in the Department of Cardiology

at the Smidt Heart Institute and senior author of the study.

‘Based on our research results, we recommend that the

medical community reassess blood pressure guidelines that

do not account for sex differences.’

For years, 120 mmHg has been considered the normal

upper limit for systolic blood pressure in adults. Persistent

elevations above this limit amount to hypertension, which is

well known as the key risk factor for common cardiovascular

diseases, such as heart attack, heart failure, and stroke.

In their newest study, Cheng and her research team

examined blood pressure measurements conducted across

four community-based cohort studies, comprising more than

27 000 participants, 54% of whom were women.

In doing so, the research team identified that while 120

mmHg was the threshold of risk in men, 110 mmHg or lower

was the threshold of risk in women. Systolic blood pressure

levels that were higher than these thresholds were associated

with risk for developing any type of cardiovascular disease,

including heart attack, heart failure and strokes.

Investigators also found that women had a lower blood

pressure threshold than men for risk of each specific

cardiovascular disease type, including heart attack, heart

failure and stroke. ‘We are now pushed to rethink what

we thought was a normal blood pressure that might keep

a woman or a man safe from developing heart disease

or stroke,’ added Cheng, who also serves as director of

cardiovascular population sciences at the Barbra Streisand

Women‘s Heart Centre and is the Erika J Glazer chair in

women’s cardiovascular health and population science.

These findings build on past research led by Cheng

suggesting women’s blood vessels age faster than those of

men. Cheng’s research, published last year, confirmed that

women have different biology and physiology from men

and also explained why women may be more susceptible of

developing certain types of cardiovascular disease and at

different points in life.

With both the 2020 study and in their latest work, Cheng

and her team compared women to women and men to men,

rather than the common model of comparing women to men.

‘If the ideal physiological range of blood pressure truly

is lower for females than males, current approaches to using

sex-agnostic targets for lowering elevated blood pressure

need to be reassessed,’ said Dr Christine Albert, chair of the

Department of Cardiology at the Smidt Heart Institute. ‘This

important work is far reaching and has numerous clinical

implications.’

As a next step, researchers plan to study whether women

should be treated for hypertension when their systolic blood

pressure is higher than 110 mmHg, but still lower than the

systolic measurement of 120 mmHg for men.

Source:

Medical Brief 2021